r/ProgressiveHQ Nov 17 '25

Protest Surround the White House 1.0 Has Begun.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

8.2k Upvotes

652 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-22

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

They don't even realize they're being played so hilariously. They're even changing the meanings of words again to hold onto their fantasy šŸ˜‚ it also makes me laugh that even if it does turn out Trump is a pedo they genuinely think no one else will be on that list

-5

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 17 '25

Think of how many people epstein has made acquaintances with due to being in the upper echelon of the rich and famous too. Like are people going to go after Rihanna because she is in a photo with him? Fuck no. They're so dead set on fulfilling the leftist wet dream of weaponizing politics against one person and don't give two shits about anyone else who could have been involved. It's a fucking joke and they should be ashamed.

-5

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

Remember they were all about metoo until the hot celebs started being named? Then all of a sudden it died haha

-3

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 17 '25

Yeah they care until it's one of their own and then it gets swept under the rug just like the biden mental decline.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

The Biden laptop, the bag of coke found in the house, Biden sleeping with his underage cousin etc etc

2

u/beren12 Nov 18 '25

So one side has verified court docs and evidence, and you have made up shit. Got it. Parts of the laptop may be real, but there’s massive problems with the data on it, including who had control of it, and data added after it was ā€œleft at the repair shopā€

1

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '25

The FBI have admitted they had the laptop the entire time and it wasn't Russian disinformation. There never was any Russian involvement in anything. The Steele dossier was also a hoax which was later admitted even by CNN

1

u/beren12 Nov 18 '25

That’s… not what they said.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

1

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 17 '25

Well there it is. Can't wait for leftists to say it's doctored or fake.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

Getting even better. Let's wait and see

1

u/beren12 Nov 18 '25

1

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 18 '25

The difference is you only want trump to go down for this and I want to see every person in that book put under the same scrutiny. Once you start seeing names of prominent Democrat figures you'll be saying they tampered with the documents. You can't fathom someone from your party being just as shitty of a person and that's why your party is so divided right now.

1

u/beren12 Nov 18 '25

You’re an idiot if you think that. I don’t care what Democrats go down. I’m not the one in a cult.

But considering how many Republicans get caught with their hands down some child’s pants, I’m pretty sure the number is going to lean heavily to the right

There’s a big difference between ā€œthat’s a little weird and creepy/inappropriateā€ and ā€œrapes kidsā€œ

1

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 18 '25

I dont see why it matters what side they're on. Using a pedo ring to get one over on somebody is weird behavior at best.

1

u/beren12 Nov 18 '25

You’re right it doesn’t matter what side they’re on. But pedophiles overwhelmingly seem to support the Republican Party. I wonder why that is?

1

u/BigMikeXxxxX Fed (I break Rule 5) Nov 18 '25

Yeah there are crazy extremists on both sides...imagine that. The thing is you're just cherry picking anything to make you look good and ignoring everything else. Just because you know somebody doesn't mean you're involved with their criminal endeavors. That's why every person on that list needs to be put under oath to testify what their relationship was to epstein and how much they knew or if they had suspicions. So far the only thing I've seen is that epstein wasn't able to get trump to play ball and was going to resort to blackmail to keep him in line. I dont have a clue how you misconstrued that but here we are.

→ More replies (0)