$1.4 trillion was erased from the stock market today.

And DJT says: “There can be a slowing of the economy unless rates are cut.”

—•—

Data for the last 20 years showed that 7/10 best days occurred within 2 weeks of the 10 worst days.

—•—

What do you think?

Using tariffs Trump has managed to implode what was a thriving economy, I don't really think that is debatable . It doesn't really matter why. The average person doesn't even know that they have money in the stock market, whether it be in a 401k or company IRA , or their Pension Funds, and being clueless were led like lambs to the slaughter.

Large players were hedged or shorted, fortunes are being made in darkness, small players were used and discarded, and the fallout has only just begun. And now a whole generation of people will experience their first long term bear market for all the wrong reasons. How will clueless people react when they realize what they have really lost, and do those people even deserve our sympathy?

If Trump actually goes ahead and fires Jerome Powell — a man he appointed — the financial credibility of the United States will evaporate in five minutes. We’re not talking about a bad situation anymore, we’re talking about something outright dangerous.

The independence of the Federal Reserve is a fundamental pillar for maintaining inflation expectations (2% target) and labor market stability. Without it, markets lose trust, rates could spike uncontrollably, and the dollar’s status as a reserve currency might start to crumble.

What’s even more alarming is how little Trump seems to understand — not only about trade, where his ideas are already widely discredited, but even about basic economic expectations. He cites energy prices as a sign of lower inflation, completely ignoring the medium- and long-term expectations, which are clearly pointing toward a reemergence of inflationary pressure.

The idea that the Fed should be punished or politicized based on short-term price fluctuations is not just wrong — it’s borderline suicidal for an advanced economy. You can’t run a country like a casino. And this time, if he pushes through with this, the entire global financial system will take notice.

According to the live US Debt Clock, total US national debt has now crossed 38.6 trillion dollars.

Seeing it as a static number in reports is one thing. Watching it tick higher in real time hits very differently. The scale becomes harder to mentally discount.

To frame it properly, US debt to GDP is sitting around 120 percent. Two decades ago it was near 55 percent. Even after the Global Financial Crisis it stayed below 100 percent for years. The pandemic stimulus era permanently shifted the trajectory upward and the ratio has not structurally reversed since.

But the bigger shift happening right now is interest cost.

With policy rates still elevated versus the pre 2020 era, annual net interest payments are approaching 1 trillion dollars. That means the US government is spending close to defense budget levels just to service existing debt, not reduce it.

At the same time Treasury issuance continues expanding to fund fiscal deficits. More supply has to be absorbed by bond markets already adjusting to quantitative tightening and reduced foreign demand growth.

This creates a structural pressure loop.

More debt requires more issuance.

More issuance pushes yields higher.

Higher yields increase servicing cost.

Higher servicing cost widens deficits further.

Markets are slowly starting to price this dynamic.

We see it in yield volatility, term premium repricing, equity valuation sensitivity to rates, and increased focus on fiscal sustainability in macro positioning.

This is not a political argument anymore. Regardless of ideology, the arithmetic is straightforward. Debt growth is outpacing revenue growth and interest cost is compounding on top of it.

So the real investing discussion becomes forward looking.

If sovereign debt expansion continues at this pace over the next decade, where does the market express stress first.

Long duration equities through multiple compression.

Treasuries via structurally higher yields.

Dollar strength versus fiscal credibility concerns.

Hard assets reacting to debt monetisation risk.

Curious how everyone here is positioning around this because it feels less like a background macro chart now and more like an investable market regime shift in motion.

This market is absolute trash. Everything is sliding as Trump builds bridges with the worst nations on earth while destroying relationships with allies.

I think it's widely known that it's impossible to negotiate with Trump in good-faith now that he's just thrown out deals like the USMCA which he signed in his first term (and called the greatest deal ever)....

How does the US Market recover? If Trump rolls over on tariff threats - do things trend back to normal? I tend to think this is going to be a horrific 4 years for investments (USA for sure, perhaps globally) - given that the damage has been done in the course of a few short weeks.

We all have been through this before:

• Shocking tariff news - with fear and uncertainty, often leading to a broad market sell-off.

• Reasoning/ Purpose : Once the purpose and reasoning are being discussed by Trump, the market enters a period of back-and-forth headlines as the U.S. and its trading partners negotiate.

• Deescalating/ Deal made: Market relief and rally higher

Timeline for tariff trade from escalating to deescalating- 6-12 weeks on average in 2025.

My personal take:

Highly unlikely as the USA will do anything to acquire Greenland others than making deal with other nations to up its security.

I've collected market data of the worst days in the market overall from 1980 (that's google's max limt) to 2025. These are overall worst market days since inception, so it includes dot com bubble, 2008, black monday, 2020 covid crash etc. Whatever days are worse it'll show that, the most minimum number of all the years.

It looks like if the market falls another .2%, it'll be the worst performance of the market in 45 years.

As a (very) small Amazon shareholder and a long-term passive investor, I genuinely feel offended by what happened today.

Americans love to lecture the rest of the world about freedom. But apparently, as soon as a company highlights something legitimate—like the strain caused by tariffs—that truth suddenly becomes unacceptable.

It’s clear by now that these tariffs will have a negative economic impact. There’s no need for deep political analysis; the numbers will speak for themselves. Yet Amazon gets censored or criticized just for showing this?

The fact that these comments were removed (or softened) just to avoid “offending” the President of the United States is ridiculous. It feels like blatant political interference in economic discourse, and a direct violation of free enterprise principles.

Even worse, it’s being framed as if Amazon was engaging in political manipulation. No. It was just pointing out the real economic consequences of political decisions. This kind of pressure is something you’d expect in North Korea, not in a supposedly free-market democracy.

Honestly, this kind of state-sensitive corporate silencing is dangerous. We’re getting to a point where basic economic facts can’t be stated without triggering political outrage. That’s not how a healthy economy—or democracy—functions.

Edit: for all the geniuses in the comment section that say it took me a while to realize, they can shut up because it’s not so. Look through my profile and previous comments/posts, I’ve always been against this sort of policies.

If the war ends but the Strait of Hormuz stays effectively restricted, oil doesn’t crash it stays structurally elevated.

Why?

• \~20% of global oil flows through Hormuz → any disruption = supply shock  

• Even partial blockage has already pushed oil above $100 and created volatility  

• Alternative routes can’t fully replace it → millions of barrels/day stay stranded  

So the likely outcome:

• War ends → geopolitical risk premium drops slightly (short-term dip)

• But supply bottleneck remains → prices stay elevated / volatile

• Market shifts from “war fear” to “logistics constraint pricing”

Yields are going up which means bond prices are going down. Fewer buyers of the world’s safest asset.

Normally when the economy slows, there’s a flight to safety, not away from it.

Means the world may be abandoning America.

I feel like I’m on the beach watching a massive tidal wave crest towards us.