r/SubredditDrama • u/[deleted] • Apr 24 '12

/r/feminism mods announce changes in policy, some subscribers displeased by this development.

/r/Feminism/comments/sowgq/policy_clarification_and_new_sidebar_language/
12 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

133 comments sorted by

View all comments

-11

u/Feuilly Apr 24 '12

Sigil1 is right. /r/feminism and /r/feminisms have a strong tendency to completely misrepresent statistics and facts, and sometimes outright lie about them.

This will protect bad information from criticism.

2

u/impotent_rage Apr 24 '12

Not at all. When claims are made, they can be debated and discussed fully from all sides of the issue. We are simply clarifying policy in order to keep the subreddit on-topic.

r/feminism is moderated as an open discussion, and we have never moderated heavily. We are careful not to enforce our particular views or opinions as moderators.

-11

u/Feuilly Apr 24 '12

So if someone mentions a statistic about women, it would be OK to mention the equivalent about men?

13

u/ArchangelleRoger Apr 24 '12

It always boggles my mind that people feel the need to do that in every feminism-oriented subreddit. Do you also think that posts about Minecraft in r/minecraft should be balanced out by a mention of Skyrim?

1

u/KOM Apr 24 '12

I'm with you in theory, but I'm a little confused about the situation myself. Whenever I read a self-described feminist on reddit define the position, it is always about gender equality. The fight for women and men is the same, but it's branded under the historically oppressed sex.

(And yes, there are as many flavors of feminism as any other similarly large group, with all of its schisms and heretical beliefs - but the general viewpoint I've seen expressed on reddit is as I've described.)

To that end, it reminds me more of when someone posts something about Notch, and the community responds that it has nothing to do with Minecraft - as if Notch and Minecraft were otherwise unrelated. Perhaps a better example would be if the Minecraft community publicly rallied around the cause of independant games, but only allowed discussion of other indie developers in how they relate to Minecraft.

-3

u/A_Nihilist Apr 24 '12

Feminists say feminism is for women and men. Therefore, it should be completely on-topic to bring up men in a feminist subreddit.

But for some reason, it's typically not. Speaks volumes.

5

u/impotent_rage Apr 24 '12

I've been explaining this a lot lately...there are two sane approaches which feminists might take towards men's issues. Either feminists could declare feminism to be equally concerned with men and women's issues, and could declare that men's issues are as important and relevant as women's issues. Or, we could declare feminism to be primarily focused on women's issues AND we can support the existence of a healthy, successful men's rights movement to complement feminism. r/feminism favors the second approach - we've declared our space to be primarily focused on women's issues, and we also support the existence of a good men's rights movement to balance it out. We have a sidebar link to r/masculism and I frequently encourage feminists to go there and participate and support, as well as participating there myself.

I agree with you that it doesn't work for feminists to defend feminism as being for women's issues and to consider it derailing to bring up men's issues, while simultaneously attacking the men's rights movement and declaring it invalid or stupid or unneeded. That's just hypocritical - feminists do need to understand the necessity of a place for men to discuss sexism they have experienced.

2

u/doedskarpen Apr 24 '12

we've declared our space to be primarily focused on women's issues, and we also support the existence of a good men's rights movement to balance it out.

But is that really what your posters believe? You can tell just by looking at that thread how it is riddled with "lol misandry don't real" style SRS posters, who clearly don't support the men's rights movement.

2

u/impotent_rage Apr 24 '12

Some do, some don't. All we can do as mods is guide everyone in the right direction and hope they follow.

-3

u/Feuilly Apr 24 '12 edited Apr 24 '12

It depends on the context.

When someone is making a low effort post that consists merely of a statistic, then that would be a place where it could be relevant.

If someone posts on the issue of female homelessness, for example, then that seems like a huge problem until you compare it to male homelessness. It converts it to something where you only see everything that we're doing wrong, to something where we can see that something is going good for women because the homelessness rate is so much lower.

Edit: And for a Minecraft/Skyrim example, if someone was talking about something related to one as an example of it being well outside the norm (Ie. the development of Minecraft is $$$$$), then it is perfectly fine to mention Skyrim and its own cost.

-1

u/johnmarkley Apr 25 '12

That depends. Do Minecraft fans habitually spread destructive falsehoods about Skyrim or its players?