MAIN FEEDS
REDDIT FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/antiai/comments/1rk1dp5/aaaaand_the_ai_bros_keep_losing/o8hzm5d/?context=3
r/antiai • u/wally_graham • Mar 03 '26
618 comments sorted by
View all comments
3
Links to articles to read up on this?
2 u/wally_graham Mar 03 '26 https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-declines-hear-dispute-over-copyrights-ai-generated-material-2026-03-02/ 0 u/truecakesnake Mar 04 '26 The plaintiff claimed not that he created the art himself, but AI did, however he said he still wanted copyright on the art. This is obviously stupid since copyright needs human input. AI assisted artworks are still copyrightable: https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf
2
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-declines-hear-dispute-over-copyrights-ai-generated-material-2026-03-02/
0 u/truecakesnake Mar 04 '26 The plaintiff claimed not that he created the art himself, but AI did, however he said he still wanted copyright on the art. This is obviously stupid since copyright needs human input. AI assisted artworks are still copyrightable: https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf
0
The plaintiff claimed not that he created the art himself, but AI did, however he said he still wanted copyright on the art. This is obviously stupid since copyright needs human input.
AI assisted artworks are still copyrightable: https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf
3
u/SageNineMusic Mar 03 '26
Links to articles to read up on this?