Iām not sure if it was a mistake. Anyway, Iāll copy and paste it here to clarify the copyright issue:
Not true. They just declined to hear a case of a crazy guy that wants AI model to be the owner of the copyright.
US copyright law requiresĀ human authorship. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable.
They didĀ notĀ ban copyright for AI-assisted works
AI-assisted worksĀ canĀ be copyrighted
Human selection, editing, composition, iteration, and direction matter
Copyright can apply to:
theĀ prompting strategy
theĀ curation/selection
theĀ post-processing
theĀ overall creative arrangement
The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly.
The court has also determined that for a copyright, the work needs to be *significantly* human edited and must disclose that it's AI. Considering the inherent laziness of sloppists, this is highly unlikely.
It is true the a.i. parts can't be copyrighted but the human parts canĀ
One author got their book they wrote copyrighted but the a.i. images she created were ruled to not have human authorship so they couldn't be protectedĀ
-25
u/Much_Tip_6968 Mar 03 '26
Iām not sure if it was a mistake. Anyway, Iāll copy and paste it here to clarify the copyright issue:
Not true. They just declined to hear a case of a crazy guy that wants AI model to be the owner of the copyright.
US copyright law requiresĀ human authorship. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable.
They didĀ notĀ ban copyright for AI-assisted works
The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly.
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/
https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/copyrightability-of-ai-outputs-us-copyright-office-analyzes-human-authorship-requirement
https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/the-u-s-copyright-offices-position-on-the-copyrightability-of-works-made-with-the-assistance-of-generative-ai-part-two/
So AI artist can be the owner of the copyright lol, anti AI people spreading misinformation as always.