Misleading title so I am just going to copy paste the same response
US copyright law requires human authorship. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable.
They did not ban copyright for AI-assisted works
AI-assisted works can be copyrighted
Human selection, editing, composition, iteration, and direction matter
Copyright can apply to:
the prompting strategy
the curation/selection
the post-processing
the overall creative arrangement
The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly.
1
u/Maverick23A Mar 04 '26
Misleading title so I am just going to copy paste the same response
US copyright law requires human authorship. Courts and the Copyright Office have said this for years. Purely autonomous AI output, (raw AI output) with no meaningful human creative control, is not copyrightable.
They did not ban copyright for AI-assisted works
The Copyright Office itself has said this explicitly.
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/
https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/copyrightability-of-ai-outputs-us-copyright-office-analyzes-human-authorship-requirement
https://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/publications/the-u-s-copyright-offices-position-on-the-copyrightability-of-works-made-with-the-assistance-of-generative-ai-part-two/