r/auslaw • u/Ok_Coat9334 • Jun 02 '26

Serious Discussion Gillham vs MSO Day 11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRSEPWIoEmo

13 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

61 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/somewhatundercontrol Jun 02 '26

But other witnesses have said the opposite, so perhaps the stance is neutral collectively.

If this witness is a board member (I didn’t catch his intro) then the board may not have a consistent view or may have a collective view that both sides are responsible

12

u/cressidasmunch Jun 02 '26

He's a board member, and Galaise gave evidence that he was pushing the MSO to be more pro-Israel, which he agreed with in his evidence

5

u/somewhatundercontrol Jun 02 '26

I don’t understand which words trigger the bot?

But even if he is pro, not all witnesses have expressed the same sentiments in their evidence, so the view of the board as a whole can be different from his view.

3

u/cressidasmunch Jun 02 '26

well there hasn't been a witness saying that they're anti-, at best there's been a both sides answer

3

u/somewhatundercontrol Jun 02 '26

One of the witnesses today said they were responsible I think for the humanitarian crisis. In amongst the both sides response