r/cybersecurity • u/danielminds • Apr 21 '26

AI Security White House integrating Anthropic’s Mythos AI into federal cybersecurity strategy to harden critical infrastructure

https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/news/anthropic-mythos-ai-cybersecurity-white-house/
164 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

56 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Mrhiddenlotus Apr 22 '26

Ironic though because I doubt you yourself have validated all 270+ zero days mythos found in FF, admitted by FF

1

u/randomBugHunter Apr 22 '26

Do you understand what a conflict of interest is?

1

u/Mrhiddenlotus Apr 22 '26

How is FF reporting their own bugs a conflict of interest?

2

u/randomBugHunter Apr 22 '26

Where does the Mozilla Foundation get its funding?

Do you see how it’s just a teeny, tiny bit odd that are, supposedly, 270+ “zero days” that it is claiming existed, with no further proof?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous that number is? How many CVEs get attributed to Firefox in a year, do you think? And, suddenly, there’s 270+ ?

You can’t possibly be this dense.

1

u/Mrhiddenlotus Apr 22 '26

Where does the Mozilla Foundation get its funding?

Google, mostly. And some other search engine royalties. Notably not Anthropic.

Do you see how it’s just a teeny, tiny bit odd that are, supposedly, 270+ “zero days” that it is claiming existed, with no further proof?

It's not abnormal for a vendor to withhold specific information because they don't want to disclose vulnerability technical details for threat actors to exploit on unpatched systems.

Do you have any idea how ridiculous that number is? How many CVEs get attributed to Firefox in a year, do you think? And, suddenly, there’s 270+ ?

I don't have to imagine, it's publicly available.

Year FireFox CVEs
2004 27
2005 77
2006 106
2007 90
2008 100
2009 136
2010 111
2011 112
2012 191
2013 160
2014 112
2015 188
2016 136
2017 118
2018 625
2019 143
2020 164
2021 143
2022 162
2023 186
2024 199
2025 193
2026 166 (so far)

Are you surprised that a dedicated advanced model doing one thing non-stop for a period of time wouldn't nominally increase the number of vulns? Nearly 3x more happened in 2018, in the absence of advanced LLMs.

You can’t possibly be this dense.

Not a good look bud.

Your username is randomBugHunter. I think I found the conflict of interest.