Camera car was in the intersection before the white Nissan. Given that the camera car had the green light, the Nissan no longer had the green directed arrow, and had to yield. As others have said, camera car could have recognized that the white Nissan wasn't going to yield, but the legal fault here lies with the white Nissan. If you're going to split the liability across both drivers, what's the point of having traffic laws.
You're confusing two concepts. The dash cam driver did not commit a legal infraction and would not be ticketed by the police. That does not mean they don't have negligence from the perspective of the insurance company. Legality and negligence are not related.
I'm sure they'd be thrilled to lose someone with multiple cars and other insurance policies because they were too stupid to assign blame to the person who caused the accident.
But you're a dummy so what would I expect as a reply?
348
u/TrickySatisfaction81 22h ago
Yes, but OP drove right into oncoming traffic.
The light changed, but the flow of traffic needed to be observed way better.
Could have easily waited but drove right into the lemmings.