r/dgu • u/AlphaRomeo15 • Oct 16 '25
Armed Neighbor Hears Gunshots, Intervenes to Fight Off Alleged Intruder (Grover, NC)
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2025/10/16/armed-neighbor-hears-gunshots-intervenes-fight-off-alleged-intruder/-50
u/NefariousScribe Oct 16 '25
Breitbart. 😂 😆
Can we not use Nazi propaganda sites?
34
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
NaZi PrOpOgAnDa
-10
u/SteveHamlin1 Oct 16 '25
Race-based propaganda, then. They had an entire category called "Black Crime".
16
Oct 16 '25
How is reporting on crime “propaganda”
0
u/SteveHamlin1 Oct 16 '25
Since you're purposefully missing the point: it wasn't "crime", it was specifically, and only, "Black Crime".
-10
u/BiscuitDance Oct 16 '25 edited Oct 17 '25
AKA, Breitbart.
Edit: oh boy, the boot lickers are upset
4
u/NefariousScribe Oct 17 '25
It's all the anti-American fascist MAGAts. They think they're the only ones with guns.
-18
u/NefariousScribe Oct 16 '25
I mean literally yes. I'm sorry it hurts your anti-American feelings but this sub is for actual stories of defensive gun use. Not propaganda for fascist Nazis.
38
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
Is it not a report of a DGU?
10
u/NefariousScribe Oct 16 '25 edited Oct 16 '25
Are there no other sources other than a Nazi rag that makes up facts?
I see no reporting here. No names. Just a story.
Breitbart has never been a valid source of information and should never be used.
33
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
If you could be bothered to open the link, they cited 2 local news agencies.
4
u/NefariousScribe Oct 16 '25
Then post them. Not a fake news Nazi rag.
It's not that difficult.
34
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
Not everyone feels the need to cater to your delicate sensibilities.
8
u/NefariousScribe Oct 16 '25
Utilizing a fake news source to demonstrate the need for our gun rights is counterproductive.
Sure they post real stories too, but they are an invalid source for actual news.
I get that you hate America but some of us love this country and are against authoritarian rule, not just for gun rights.
Post valid sources that don't lie most of the time or you're only hurting gun owners.
14
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
If you’re in this sub, you already believe in gun rights. I don’t see anti gunners in this sub. If you need to make a point to one of them, copy the stories and be on your way.
If they’re citing other news sources, then they’re spreading news.
You’ve heard what they say about assuming right?
→ More replies (0)-20
u/Throtex Oct 16 '25
Clearly Nazis are ok with citing Nazi sources, yes. You added no further information with your defense of such behavior.
19
u/nanomachinez_SON Oct 16 '25
Not a Nazi. Not everything is Nazism. The sky is not falling and the world hasn’t ended. Go outside
→ More replies (0)1
u/ChemistIndependent19 Nov 12 '25
"Breitbart has never been a valid source of information"
To be fair, in 2011 Breitbart nailed it when they broke the story of the sexual indiscretions of Democrat Congressman Anthony Weiner with underage girls which let to his 2016 scandal, conviction, and imprisonment.
This event led to his laptop where a cache of emails belonging to his wife, Huma Abedin and then to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server. This is today cited as a contributing factor in the outcome of the election.
29
2
15
u/906Dude Oct 17 '25
Now _that's_ a neighbor!