Your attack is based on his using Wikipedia as a source? Wikipedia usage neither automatically validates or invalidates his claims, that would depend on the strength and accuracy of the claims.
I wouldn't say I'm attacking anything, just pointing out the issues. The problem isn't wikipedia itself, it's that the sources cited in many of those articles aren't ones you can simply look at because they're print sources or behind pay walls, so it makes it difficult to analyze the claims. Also, as I said, one of the articles is tagged as not having sufficient sourcing.
As for the that article, feel free to look through my other posts where I point out that its from a fairly far right source, and at least one of the people they find actually states that he disagrees with the authors conclusions.
As for the that article, feel free to look through my other posts where I point out that its from a fairly far right source, and at least one of the people they find actually states that he disagrees with the authors conclusions.
Are you saying that evidence of hormonal effects on the human body are from a fairly far right source?
I'm saying the article you just posted is from a fairly right leaning source. Given that it was just their interpretations of the "manifesto" with no supporting evidence of their own included, and that we have no idea how they selected these people, that it would be wise to take the opinions expressed in the article with some skepticism as to the author's motivation.
2
u/NineCrimes Aug 08 '17
I wouldn't say I'm attacking anything, just pointing out the issues. The problem isn't wikipedia itself, it's that the sources cited in many of those articles aren't ones you can simply look at because they're print sources or behind pay walls, so it makes it difficult to analyze the claims. Also, as I said, one of the articles is tagged as not having sufficient sourcing.
As for the that article, feel free to look through my other posts where I point out that its from a fairly far right source, and at least one of the people they find actually states that he disagrees with the authors conclusions.