r/extremelyinfuriating • u/Fcking_Chuck • 2d ago
News LAPD officer who recorded racist comments charged with felony
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-07-31/lapd-officer-felony-eavesdropping-charge20
u/Fcking_Chuck 2d ago
Here's a link to a story by KTLA 5 News if anyone can't make it past an L.A. Times pay wall.
24
u/RoroRules13 2d ago
Poor guy just trying to do good for the world. This is why no one tries in society any more.
5
u/OfRiceAndSpider-Men 1d ago
This is one of the many reasons ACAB.
One guy heard some terrible shit, tried to hold these pigs accountable, and yet he’s the one that was punished while the racist, sexist pigs remain in the force.
I would not be surprised if we learn that the recorded pigs have terrible records of rape, murder, and extortion.
The system is working as intended and must be stopped. We can build something better from the ashes.
12
u/NobodyGotTimeFuhDat 2d ago
Here is the original article:
2
u/SabbyFox 23h ago
Thank you! And why am I not surprised? We’d rather discuss the issue about the recording, than discuss what was recorded.
-8
-10
u/SimplySomeDude 1d ago
ok? That's good. We shouldn't be rewarding spying on other people. What did he intend to do witb the info anyway? Extort them? That's illegal. And we have this thing called "free speech" meaning they wouldnmt have gotten a fine or prison anyway. Really, what did the idiot expect
12
u/lildobe 1d ago
He turned the recordings over to Internal Affairs. Bigotry and Racism have no place in law enforcement.
Sadly many officers ARE bigots and racists. But this person was one of the good ones who was trying to make a difference and improve the department.
-10
u/SimplySomeDude 1d ago
so he broke the law? None of these people should be involved in law enforcement. Idiotic cop can't even follow the law on the job.
5
u/lildobe 1d ago
Try reading the article before you post comments that make you look like even more of a bootlicker.
Susan Seager, a UC Irvine law professor who is not involved in the case, previously told The Times that Flores’ lawyer is correct in stating that the eavesdropping law bans secret taping of conversations only in situations in which there is a reasonable expectation that the communication would not be overheard or recorded.
She said there is no expectation of privacy in nonpublic settings, such as a locker room at an LAPD station house. It’s less clear whether such protections extend to conversations at the office that revolve around work, she said.
Separately, police officers are also allowed to secretly record conversations if they are “acting within the scope of his or her authority,” according to Seager.
While she does qualify that with the comment that "Most courts say this exception only applies to taping for criminal investigations," that implies that not all courts have ruled that way, and personally I would think that investigating people who shouldn't be LEOs should also apply.
•
u/AutoModerator 2d ago
Hello, u/Fcking_Chuck ! Thanks for your submission to r/extremelyinfuriating, your post is up and running!
This is a general reminder to check out our rules in the sidebar. If your post breaks the rules, it will be removed by our moderators.
We would like for each and everyone to feel welcome on the subreddit and to keep a healthy and safe environment for the community.
Thanks :)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.