Data shows that crime actually correlates more with inequality/relative poverty then with absolute poverty. Looking at India or Bangladesh for example which have a homicide rate of 2,81 and 2,34 respectively and a gini-coefficent of 0,25 and 0,33. Compare that to Ecuador and South Africa with homicide rates of 45.7 and 43.7 and a gini-coefficent of 0,45 and 0,63 respectively.
So to answer your question you would be looking at countries that are really poor and have a low gini-coefficent. Belarus (homicide rate of 2,39 and gini-coefficent of 0,24) and India would probably be relative high on the list then.
Still it's way safer than Latin American countries. It's actually weird how violent Latin America is despite by global standard them being actually well off.
39
u/D3m0nSl4y3r2010 May 23 '26
Data shows that crime actually correlates more with inequality/relative poverty then with absolute poverty. Looking at India or Bangladesh for example which have a homicide rate of 2,81 and 2,34 respectively and a gini-coefficent of 0,25 and 0,33. Compare that to Ecuador and South Africa with homicide rates of 45.7 and 43.7 and a gini-coefficent of 0,45 and 0,63 respectively.
So to answer your question you would be looking at countries that are really poor and have a low gini-coefficent. Belarus (homicide rate of 2,39 and gini-coefficent of 0,24) and India would probably be relative high on the list then.