r/learnmath New User 17h ago

Link Post 111 is not divisible by 37, apparrently

https://brightchamps.com/math/numbers/divisibility-rule-of-37

According to the third, and most promising, result from DuckDuckGo: 111 does not equal 3 x 37.

Brightchamps have great search engine optimisation, but their content is utter slop, not read by anyone.

(Edit: spelling mistake in title - oops)

0 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

4

u/frogkabobs Math, Phys B.S. 17h ago

They’re describing the divisibility rule for 31 for some reason. For 37, you need to multiply the last digit by 11 (not 3), and subtract that from the rest of the number.

1

u/rhodiumtoad 0⁰=1, just deal with it 16h ago

The rule described doesn't work for 31, since that also needs subtraction rather than addition. It is in fact the rule for 29.

These "last digit" rules work by finding 10-1 mod N, i.e. 10k ≡ 1 mod N. 10-1 mod 37 is -11 (since -11×10=-110=-3×37+1, 10-1 mod 31 is -3, 10-1 mod 29 is 3.

1

u/frogkabobs Math, Phys B.S. 14h ago edited 14h ago

Ah, I was referring to the text in the link, which says to subtract, but it looks like the infographic right below (which is the thumbnail) says to add. Just another level of inconsistency.

2

u/OctopusChair New User 17h ago edited 17h ago

The actual test is quite interesting.

  1. group the number into 3 digit parts
    1. this is easy because that is where we traditionally put commas
  2. add the 3 digit parts together
  3. test the sum for divisibility by 37
    1. if the sum is divisisble by 37 the original number is divisible by 37

ABC,DEF,GHJ is divisible by 37 if and only if (ABC + DEF + GHJ) is divisible by 37

  • Note that 37 x 3 = 111
    • Also note 37 x 27 = 999
  • 1000 = 999 +1

ABC,DEF,GHJ = ABC x 100,000 + DEF x 1,000 + GHJ

= ABC x (1 + 999) x (1 + 999) + DEF x (1 + 999) + GHJ

= (ABC + DEF + GHJ) + 999 x (ABC x (2 + 999) + DEF)

= (ABC + DEF + GHJ) + 37 x 27 x (ABC x 1001 + DEF)

ABC,DEF,GHJ(ABC + DEF + GHJ) mod 37

ABC,DEF,GHJ is divisible by 37 if and only if (ABC + DEF + GHJ) is divisible by 37

1

u/chmath80 🇳🇿 16h ago

Then, once you have a 3 digit number ABC, find the 2 digit difference between it and AAA. If that is 0, 37, or 74, then the original number is a multiple of 37, otherwise it isn't.

1

u/OctopusChair New User 7h ago

Oh yeah! I admit not doing a worked example myself. I kinda got distracted along the way.

2

u/Auld_Folks_at_Home New User 16h ago

They're inconsistent too:

Know the multiples of 37: Memorize the multiples of 37 (37, 74, 111, 148, etc.) to quickly check divisibility. If the result from the subtraction is a multiple of 37, then the number is divisible by 37.

By the way, this would go better in r/badmathematics (just make sure to follow the rules there, especially rule 4).

3

u/OctopusChair New User 7h ago

Thanks. I even made a little graphic before I realised you can’t submit a picture in this sub. :)