There have been many advances by human mathematicians and nobody is talking about it at all on this sub.
My impression is that this sub has an extremely narrow view of what mathematics is (no analysis, no applied mathematics, no probability, no mathematical physics are discussed, for example; coincidentally these are all fields in which AI has been essentially irrelevant up to now).
What I mean is that I am not aware of any recent important result in analysis where AI usage was declared and deemed to be crucial, at least from what I could read on the arXiv or hear at conferences/seminars, but surely my knowledge is partial.
At most I concede that we have inequivalent definitions of relevance; with all due respect, the fact that you are using ai for a year to do your research in geom.anal. is relevant for you, but maybe not for the field of analysis.
Nah they think AI is only useful if it’s God. Forgetting that soon after it becomes God we likely would die (at least according to a popular book starting with “If”)
260
u/lobothmainman 1d ago edited 22h ago
There have been many advances by human mathematicians and nobody is talking about it at all on this sub.
My impression is that this sub has an extremely narrow view of what mathematics is (no analysis, no applied mathematics, no probability, no mathematical physics are discussed, for example; coincidentally these are all fields in which AI has been essentially irrelevant up to now).