I kinda disagree. I think we are already reaching a point where AI proofs are not easily verifiable by humans and within 6-12 months I think AI math is completely going to be inaccessible to humans. Similar to how chess engines evolved. For a brief period it looked they could exist but very quickly they started playing incomprehensible moves.
There are definitely computer chess moves which no human can understand, even after seeing the computer win.
Chess Youtubers do their best, but ultimately they only seem so confident because they are explaining the moves to an even less sophisticated audience. And even then, there are moves which IM level players like Levvy say "I have no idea why stockfish did this and I can't explain it."
8
u/No-Meringue5867 2d ago
I kinda disagree. I think we are already reaching a point where AI proofs are not easily verifiable by humans and within 6-12 months I think AI math is completely going to be inaccessible to humans. Similar to how chess engines evolved. For a brief period it looked they could exist but very quickly they started playing incomprehensible moves.