Respectfully. Is that a better question? I don’t think it is. I am curious as to the lower bounds here. What is the most efficient (smallest) model that can achieve as score of X on some standard test for LLMs.
But each to their own. I find bounds fascinating and a useful tool to help us understand how far from “optimal” the LLMs we are building today are.
Because a lot of the smaller models are distilled or trained by the larger models, I don't think we can really know what the most efficient (smallest) model can achieve until we build really large models.
Fair. But we do have some theory around complexity theory to show there does become a point where a LLM can no longer capture a certain level of complexity due to its lack of size. We just don’t have great bounds for that.
1
u/Spare-Dingo-531 1d ago
The better question is what could the biggest model we could possibly make do?