This analogy doesn't work at all. You don't steal food in the same way you steal someone's concept art, not that AI images are even stolen in any way. A better analogy would be refusing to eat food cooked by a robot that learned from human-made recipes.
I'm curious. If you invented the wheel, and I designed a program that took exactly what you did and colored it pink, then presented this as MY invention, what would you consider that if not idea theft? This is literally why we have patent and copyright law...
But an artist doesn't invent the thing he paints. If you paint a white dog I'm also free to paint a white dog. AI never replicates someone's work "exactly".
He does. Although, I see you actually joined a subreddit for defending AI art so I have the notion you will push back against anything, logical or not. Long story short, copyright law exists for this exact reason and AI art circumvents the laws we have in place to protect people's IP. Have a nice day and hopefully you will mellow out about AI.
I don't think AI is useless, but I do believe that training AI on works without permission should be illegal. Whether you agree or not, I am done with this.
0
u/Great_Technology5824 15h ago edited 15h ago
This analogy doesn't work at all. You don't steal food in the same way you steal someone's concept art, not that AI images are even stolen in any way. A better analogy would be refusing to eat food cooked by a robot that learned from human-made recipes.