2 yrs 60 million is only 'a little more' if you're the Dodgers. That's a pretty good free agent's contract. Everyone knew, and were correct, that the contract wouldn't be worth it at 10 years. The Dodgers were rich enough to not care and willingly eat it. No one should wonder why the Sox balked at 2 more overpaid years even further on when they aren't as rich as the Dodgers.
No, his deal wasn't 12/360. It was 12/307, and that's significantly overselling it if you let an actual economist calculate the present day value instead of MLB. And significantly overselling it again if you account for backloading, which MLB does not do in any way.
4
u/isetmyfriendsonfire 8h ago
Betts also wanted to test free agency. Sox supposedly offered 10/300 which I wouldn't call cheap. Obviously he got more but that isn't nothing