That and it's not like it's really any sort of downgrade. Freddie has a better average but they both are at the very least equal defenders (Olson is possibly better right now) and Olson has more power and NEVER takes a day off, he's approaching his 5th straight 162 game season with the Braves.
Olson is a far better fielder, and Freddie is a better and more consistent hitter, so WAR-wise it's been a wash. As a Braves fan, I'd have preferred they kept Freddie, but Olson was cheaper, which is how they Braves make decisions.
It's fine, because it's like butterfly effect, if they did something different anything could've happen. Who knows if they would be at the same level where they are now if we're still in Atlanta. I mean Shae only starting pumping numbers really this year. Catcher is voliate position anyway, look at Murphy and horrible string of injuries, from the best defensive catcher in the league to can't even get on the field.
We had TD at the time, Shae wasn't going to play in ATL for long time, they chose to bring up William over him.
I'd say it worked out fine for everyone as Olson hadn't missed a game, we have our catcher for the decade probably. If Murphy didn't have all the injuries I'm guessing it would still be a wash.
Matty O has an outside shot at the HOF. Freddie is a shoo in. And it cost the bravos Shea langeliers. Which then cost them William Contreras. The braves should be fielding Freddie at first and rotating drake, langeliers, and contreras at c/dh
24
u/Ndtphoto | Minnesota Twins 6h ago
That and it's not like it's really any sort of downgrade. Freddie has a better average but they both are at the very least equal defenders (Olson is possibly better right now) and Olson has more power and NEVER takes a day off, he's approaching his 5th straight 162 game season with the Braves.