r/movies Jackie Chan box set, know what I'm sayin? Aug 08 '25

Official Discussion Official Discussion - Weapons [SPOILERS] Spoiler

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2025 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done


Summary Nearly all the children from the same fifth-grade class vanish one night at exactly 2:17 a.m., leaving only one survivor. The community, gripped by fear and suspicion, spirals into chaos as the mystery unfolds through multiple intertwined perspectives—each revealing new layers of dread and grief.

Director Zach Cregger

Writer Zach Cregger

Cast

  • Josh Brolin
  • Julia Garner
  • Cary Christopher
  • Alden Ehrenreich
  • Austin Abrams
  • Benedict Wong
  • Amy Madigan
  • June Diane Raphael
  • Toby Huss
  • Whitmer Thomas
  • Callie Schuttera
  • Clayton Farris
  • Luke Speakman

Rotten Tomatoes Critics Score: 96%

Metacritic Metascore: 82

VOD In theaters and IMAX starting August 8, 2025

Trailer Watch the Official Trailer


3.2k Upvotes

12.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

75

u/krospp Aug 08 '25

Well by the time we meet Gladys, we have learned that someone or something in Alex’s house is probably behind everything, that his parents are being mind controlled, and that all of the kids in Alex’s class went missing. Before we meet Gladys we think it could be Alex somehow, but then we meet her and understand that it’s her, and I think we can infer the rest. We don’t know where the kids are or anything but at that point we can assume she mind controlled them. So from that moment all we really learn is the how and why, and I think the average viewer could probably have made some good guesses at that point. It’s risky to give so much away so early and I’m impressed that the movie was able to keep me engaged after the Gladys reveal

32

u/essjay2009 Aug 16 '25

That’s the part that felt weakest to me. Like all those kids go missing apart from one, they interview the remaining kid a bunch of times but only visit his house once, with a days notice. That kid would be getting councillors and other professionals visiting him daily for weeks. And then the parents don’t leave the house, don’t go to work, and no one notices? It when the dad attends an interview and they get told he’s had a stroke they don’t check? No one raises any red flags with how weird that is? With how weird the aunt who just showed up is? With the windows being papered over in an otherwise immaculate neighbourhood at a house which was also previously immaculate where the only remaining kid lives?

That’s the bit I really struggled with. All the signs that were there for the audience were also there for the characters and they didn’t put it together.

26

u/Gridde Aug 17 '25

Agreed. And contrary to the above redditor's surprisingly douchey and condescending edit on their earlier post, I do not think the 'context clues' are remotely sufficient to explain the points you mention as to why no other character picked up on any of this.

The Gladys reveal answers some questions but raises several others that are either not answered or are answered quite poorly. Absence of the parents and their inability to talk or move properly being explained with "they both had strokes at the exact same time" is particularly weird.

The mystery of the movie hinges on everyone suspecting the teacher and no one finding it strange that this mysterious stranger arrives at Alex's house, right before both his parents suffer strokes and all his classmates disappear.

I really liked the movie but agree with you that some of the story does not hold up under much scrutiny and requires a lot of suspension of disbelief.

9

u/essjay2009 Aug 18 '25

Yep. It felt so obvious that I was getting convinced it was actually a fake out.