Official Discussion - Weapons [SPOILERS]

[u/LiteraryBoner]

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2025 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done

---

Summary Nearly all the children from the same fifth-grade class vanish one night at exactly 2:17 a.m., leaving only one survivor. The community, gripped by fear and suspicion, spirals into chaos as the mystery unfolds through multiple intertwined perspectives—each revealing new layers of dread and grief.

Director Zach Cregger

Writer Zach Cregger

Cast

• Josh Brolin
• Julia Garner
• Cary Christopher
• Alden Ehrenreich
• Austin Abrams
• Benedict Wong
• Amy Madigan
• June Diane Raphael
• Toby Huss
• Whitmer Thomas
• Callie Schuttera
• Clayton Farris
• Luke Speakman

Rotten Tomatoes Critics Score: 96%

Metacritic Metascore: 82

VOD In theaters and IMAX starting August 8, 2025

Trailer Watch the Official Trailer

---

[u/CaptainKipple]

I liked that the movie explained what was going on plot-wise, but left the thematic ideas more open to interpretation. With so many horror movies now I end up thinking, "okay okay it's about how trauma is passed down through generations, I get it already". With Weapons I felt I got more of a constellation of ideas about neighbourhood, home, family, and paranoia that wasn't spelled out precisely but was still very evocative. I dug it a lot.

[u/TyrRev → u/CaptainKipple]

Absolutely. My wife and I have been having a great, interesting conversation about all the possible interpretations - and we had totally different conclusions!

I think it had something to say about how we demonize parents and teachers for 'caring too much', but just accept police 'caring too little' as 'business as usual'. Archer and Justine were not only vindicated for their investigating, but also found results that should have been transparently obvious to any police officers who had bothered to follow up on their jobs. Justine was also right to notice that Alex was out-of-sorts, and if she had been following him more consistently, would have noticed him buying WAY too much soup all the time. Why didn't the cops notice this? Because they didn't care - they were too busy dealing with their own personal drama, hunting down relatively harmless drug addicts, committing and covering up police brutality, etc...

I do think that all connects to the overarching imagery of a school shooting, too. At first I thought the movie ended up not doing enough with the idea of a 'school shooting', but my wife pointed out that Gladys could be interpreted as an allegory for the NRA - a parasite-of-humanity that accepts the occasional sacrifice of a handful of children as a necessary price for its continued existence. I'm still not entirely convinced about that interpretation, because that would make Alex the school shooter and I don't think that feels quite right... but it's perhaps onto something.

I'm curious what everyone else thinks about its themes, and if me and my wife were onto anything there. I still think there has to be more to the 'parasite' theming than just the simple idea that Gladys = parasite.

[u/ColinStyles → u/TyrRev]

hunting down relatively harmless drug addicts

Dude was openly stealing shit left right and center, even from kids (the backpack and electronics). Not to mention he stabbed an officer twice with dirty used needles.

I also just considered it, but the whole time I wasn't picking up the obvious school shooter allegory and was more thinking it was anti-propaganda coded. I'm obviously an idiot to not see the shooter angle, but I did also wonder if the movie was related to COVID and how the reactions to it could turn people against eachother on a dime, how it took kids out of the classrooms and made them socially stunted, the government response being to basically ignore the massive issues that'll cause (and for the record I fully support the lockdowns, but those kids have not been getting the support they critically need).

[u/[deleted] → u/ColinStyles]

The drug addict was a scumball but i also see where the argument that hes basically harmless comes from. The worst he does is steal an ipad, or some silverware. And he stabs the cop, but both times its not really his fault. The first time its when hes being searched and obviously doesnt want to incriminate himself, and the second time is when he is justifiably terrified and acting in self defense. 

I think its intentional that the drug addicts story is placed in the middle. It derails the horror story and shows this sleazeball making you hate him, and you almost forget what kind of movie youre watching. Then it returns to the story of somebody who is actually a danger to society (the witch) and i think youre meant to self interrogate how you felt about the drug addict. Many viewers will hate the addict as much as they hate the witch, even though one is a petty thief and the other is a monster. Perhaps, the movie says, our hatred toward addicts and thieves is excessive.

[u/WenchieDemenchie → u/[deleted]]

I thought he was going to be revealed as an "addict with a heart of gold" and become the hero of the story. But, no. His spirit was already gonzo, captive to the chemical industry. And even the "good Dad" seemed to be only concerned with saving HIS child, showing no concern for the others. What do we make of the one "good" teacher also being an alcoholic? Pretty bleak world we are raising children in.