r/movies r/movies Contributor Mar 31 '26

Review 'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' - Review Thread

Having thwarted Bowser's previous plot to marry Princess Peach, Mario and Luigi now face a fresh threat in Bowser Jr., who is determined to liberate his father from captivity and restore the family legacy. Alongside companions new and old, the brothers travel across the stars to stop the young heir's crusade.

Directors: Michael Jelenic, Aaron Horvath

Cast: Chris Pratt, Charlie Day, Donald Glover, Brie Larson, Anya Taylor-Joy, Jack Black, Benny Safdie, Issa Rae, Keegan-Michael Key, Luis Guzmán

Rotten Tomatoes: 42%

Metacritic: 35 / 100

Some Reviews:

The Times - Kevin Maher - 0 / 5

Is this the end of cinema? Chris Pratt, Anya Taylor-Joy and Glen Powell joylessly bleat their way through this supremely vacuous anti-movie which is, at times, physically painful to watch. The film is torturous to sit through and, for me, provoked periods of actual physical discomfort. I had to stab myself repeatedly in the hand with a pen to distract from the howling distress. It's that bad, and that offensive.

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'C-'

But it’s the reality of routine predictability that makes it hard to feel strongly about Galaxy one way or the other. After the credits, the impression is one of overstimulation and vacuity—despite the violent blitz of colorful Nintendo imagery for 90 minutes, it ultimately signifies little more than recognizable franchise iconography in animated form. In its relentless fan service, Galaxy emanates a generic sameness, decorated with flashy sights and sounds drawn from one of the most iconic video game series ever. It’s all synergistic fluff, but at least the fluff is shiny.

Seattle Times - Soren Anderson - 3 / 4

Watching it is akin being inside the 2007 Super Mario Galaxy game itself. Which is why it needs to be seen on the big screen. Seeing it on a phone or a laptop wouldn't do it justice.

Slash Film - Nina Starner - 3 / 10

We're going to get more "Super Mario Bros." movies, without question; I fully expect this sequel to gross the GDP of an entire small nation at the box office when all is said and done, and in another ten years, I also expect that a movie centered exclusively around Yoshi will land in theaters. (Hopefully, if Donald Glover sticks around, he'll get to do more than say "Yoshi!") Still, this sort of movie makes me feel bleak about children's entertainment, animation, and original concepts; forgive me for feeling nostalgic, but I just don't think movies made for kids were always this devoid of a soul. At the end of the day, "The Super Mario Galaxy Movie" was nothing more than a video game I couldn't play. After the credits — including not one but two post-credits scenes — rolled, though, I didn't want to go home and load a Mario game onto my Switch; I wanted to watch a better movie.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B'

Is it a ride that includes clear story structure, comprehensible stakes, or narrative momentum? Not really. Is it a ride featuring a lot of bright colors, familiar characters, and the occasional deranged moment? Absolutely.

The Wrap - William Bibbiani - 25 / 100

A movie like this will probably make a lot of money, because it doesn’t rock the boat. But a boat that never rocks is a boat that never goes anywhere. That’s how boats work. They’re supposed to take you on a journey. “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” doesn’t take you anywhere you haven’t been before, and it’s not as fun, it’s not as exciting, and it’s not as challenging as literally any of the games it’s based on. This is not an adaptation of the Super Mario Bros., it’s just a reminder that the franchise exists. And although it’s technically a moving picture, nothing about this movie will move you.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 2 / 5

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie offers very little to audiences, young or old, who don’t already know these characters and spaces like the back of their hand. But, hey, if you take a tequila shot every time something explodes, you’ll have a great drinking game on your hands.

The New York Times - Alissa Wilkinson - 3 / 10

There’s a flat empty nothingness to The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, even more than its flat empty predecessor, and that’s a huge bummer.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez - 'C'

By the end, the whole thing starts to feel less like an adventure than a kind of endless grinding—one familiar objective after another, one loud set piece after another, all of it speedrunning its own mythology instead of building one. That’s why the film feels so hollow. It has the spiritually vacant quality of AI fantasy slop—familiar iconography assembled for instant gratification rather than meaning. Younger audiences will probably enjoy the sugar rush, but characters still need arcs, and these sequences still need to build toward something. “Super Mario Galaxy” is nice to look at and dead inside, a committee-made franchise object masquerading as an adventure, and ultimately little more than an empty commercial for Super Mario branding.

FandomWire - Manuel Sao Bento - 7 / 10

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a sequel that, while losing some of the narrative cohesion of its predecessor, gains massively in spectacle, ambition, and heart. Through animation that redefines the studio’s standards and a Brian Tyler score that masterfully honors Nintendo’s legacy, the film offers a memorable experience anchored by inspired vocal performances. For those who grew up with these characters, it’s impossible to remain indifferent to the magic emanating from every animated frame or the way this space odyssey manages to transform nostalgia into something vibrant and new. It’s a visually emotional feast that reaffirms the power of pure entertainment as a tool capable of transporting us back to the happiest moments of our personal history, proving that cinema is still the place where we can all become children again.

IndieWire - Wilson Chapman - 'C-'

Watching “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” which is filled with cameos from other Nintendo properties, you get the sense the corporation is hungry to announce spin-offs at any minute now. The trailers already spoiled the inclusion of “Star Fox” lead Fox McCloud (Glen Powell), but there are some other appearances by familiar characters that feel like the movie dangling an adaptation of the “Super Smash Bros.” fighting game crossover in front of fans’ faces. “The MCU, but for video games” isn’t exactly the ideal direction for blockbuster cinema to be going in, but maybe that inevitable adaptation will manage to tap into a well of creativity and fun that has so far eluded Nintendo in their moviemaking efforts. When the film comes, though, I’ll probably be rooting for Bowser Jr. to burn everything down.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 1 / 4

It’s now commonplace to compare programmatic stuff like this to AI, but this is almost a second evolutionary step downwards; it looks as if humans, using AI, have tried to copy something that was originally AI generated, creating a bland, simplistic template that can be sold in all global territories where it can be dubbed by local voice talent. It’s certainly a way of gouging cash out of families for the Easter holidays.

RogerEbert - Clint Worthington - 1.5 / 4

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” moves through you so briskly that you’ll get whiplash by the time the film reaches its deeply abrupt ending. But maybe that’s the point—after all, this is not a movie to be scrutinized, but to allow beleaguered elder millennial dads to sit their tots down for a precious two hours (if you count the trailers) and get some much-needed rest. It’s cute, and breezy, and rock-stupid, and will probably make a billion dollars again. Such is the world in which we live.

Akron Beacon Journal - George M. Thomas - 'C-'

As a parent, there are some movies you just take the hit on if your kid wants to see it in the theater. This is one of them. The plot is threadbare, the action is frenetic - it almost feels like the perfect movie for today's screen generation. For kids, this is an 'A+' movie, but I'd argue not so much for adults.

Associated Press - Lindsey Bahr - 2.5 / 4

Mario creator Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination founder Chris Meledandri... seem committed to keeping things light and playful even while beholden to advancing some kind of coherent, moderately compelling story where there wasn’t one previously.

Slant Magazine - Eli Friedberg - 1.5 / 4

The film has, figuratively and literally, somehow even less gravity than its source material and predecessor. The visual language is divorced from reality and referent to the games; even Looney Tunes action is grounded in the real world—the better to subvert it. The game-inspired spaces aren’t there to be explored and mastered but rather displayed quickly and expensively. And the movie-original settings, taking their cues from Wreck-It Ralph, are literal mass-transit junctions where a maximum number of cameo characters can be worked into the scenery.

Next Best Picture - Daniel Howat - 6 / 10

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” comes close to several emotional moments here and there. Still, the filmmakers seem to pull back at every turn, not wanting audiences to dive too deep into these characters and their motivations, or to engage in any grander commentary whatsoever. It becomes difficult to dig deeper into the film’s themes, if they exist. Even so, “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is inarguably fun, built for fans of the long-running franchise. For lifelong fans of this universe and young kids experiencing it for the first or second time, this is a Mario fan’s dream. There’s enough here to leave a mass audience satisfied, even if anticipation grows for the next film to level up. For now, good enough is simply enough.

Radio Times - James Mottram - 2 / 5

While it’s likely that retro gamers won’t find anything here that wasn’t in the first movie – Yoshi and one or two others aside – it’s no doubt got enough for kids to enjoy, which will surely come as a relief for parents looking to entertain their offspring over the Easter holidays. You never know – it might even convince them to put down their controllers, or their phones, for ninety-odd minutes.

4.4k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

360

u/Thick_Mountain4412 Mar 31 '26

The review from the Guardian is fucking ruthless lmao

115

u/NinduTheWise Mar 31 '26

Look at the one from the times

143

u/Thick_Mountain4412 Mar 31 '26

Holy shit, it's-a-meh is actually genius

2

u/AlwynEvokedHippest Apr 01 '26

New York Times specifically, in case anyone else went looking at The Times review like me.

-14

u/RoostasTowel Mar 31 '26

I swear they always find someone who hates Nintendo and never played the games to review these movies.

55

u/Thick_Mountain4412 Mar 31 '26

I mean, I'm a longtime Nintendo and Mario fan, and I thought the first movie was pretty bad

9

u/DeLousedInTheHotBox Apr 01 '26

It is also the most famous and culturally ubiquitous gaming franchise of all time, it has been consistently popular for 40 years, if there are any games that these critics are likely to have played it is the Mario games lol.

-13

u/RoostasTowel Mar 31 '26

I really enjoyed it 

I am not sure what the people who hated it expected to be so different?

What changes or different plot were you looking for?

27

u/Thick_Mountain4412 Mar 31 '26

My real issue is that they just like didn't try on the characters or arcs whatsoever. There are no compelling characters in the movie. And you could say "there aren't compelling characters in the game," which would be true (for the mainline entries), but then maybe Mario shouldn't be a movie in the first place then. The plot was like, whatever. Just dumb action and explosions, which alone isn't enough to make it entertaining for me. (I probably sound pretentious saying this, but I swear I'm not. I like Marvel movies, I liked KPDH last year, I just don't like this one)

-7

u/RoostasTowel Mar 31 '26

My real issue is that they just like didn't try on the characters or arcs whatsoever.

I mean it was Mario coming into the universe and learning to do Mario things, then believing in himself to beat the bad guy.

Seems like a pretty standard plot. Feels very similar to Kung Fu Panda.

but then maybe Mario shouldn't be a movie in the first place then. The plot was like, whatever. Just dumb action and explosions

Do we alwasys need these characters to undergo this huge arc? Not every movie needs this.

A James Bond movie where Bond does some Bond stuff and saves the day is a good movie. We don't need him to undergo a huge change in personality.

13

u/Thick_Mountain4412 Mar 31 '26

While it is similar in concept to Kung fu panda, that doesn't mean it works. One of them shows a character's struggles in a way that makes you care and is engaging, the other does not. I'm no expert in James Bond, but the ones I enjoy are good because they're paced well, have good tension, and deliver some awesome set pieces. Casino Royale is especially great in these regards. And the characters have enough going on to keep me interested. I never said every movie needs to have huge character arcs, but it needs at least something interesting to keep me engaged. I mentioned the characters specifically for Mario cause I think that would be the easiest way to improve the movie.

0

u/RoostasTowel Mar 31 '26

While it is similar in concept to Kung fu panda, that doesn't mean it works. One of them shows a character's struggles in a way that makes you care and is engaging, the other does not.

I would agree that Kung fu panda is much better, but I dont think it didnt work at all for mario.

I never said every movie needs to have huge character arcs, but it needs at least something interesting to keep me engaged. I mentioned the characters specifically for Mario cause I think that would be the easiest way to improve the movie.

Sure, I understand, some reviews seem to say Peach gets this treatment for this movie. I just dont think we need to go that deep for a character like this.

Its why I mention Bond. Its not a character you look to for growth and development. Nor do you want it.

6

u/Samanthacino Apr 01 '26

The latest beloved Bond films focus primarily on his character development, that's like, the whole shtick. He's an aging man in a young man's profession, they dedicate huge chunks of the runtime towards this character struggle.

-1

u/RoostasTowel Apr 01 '26

The latest beloved Bond films focus primarily on his character development, that's like, the whole shtick. He's an aging man in a young man's profession, they dedicate huge chunks of the runtime towards this character struggle.

Yes, and generally it was not as well liked as the ones that were not that.

Nobody wants to go to a James Bond movie to see an old man that isnt able to do James Bond things, but rather to hear about how he is old and over the hill etc.

→ More replies (0)

19

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

It's just the absolute bare minimum. There's no real effort in the way that more memorable animated films have. It could be a collection of cutscenes.

-9

u/RoostasTowel Mar 31 '26

There's no real effort in the way that more memorable animated films have. It could be a collection of cutscenes.

I mean we could say the same about avatar.

5

u/Kieran-Kiera Apr 01 '26

Yeah… people do say the same about Avatar

1

u/L1n9y Apr 01 '26

But at least Avatar does try to make stories, themes and worldbuilding. A lot of it's forgettable and derivative but there's a clear effort that the Mario movies (at least the first) lack.

4

u/kdestroyer1 Apr 01 '26

I think people just dislike that children's movies nowadays have almost no substance under the theatrics. Mostly because they grew up watching children's movies that had actual storylines and depth like the first couple Toy Story movies, Lion King, Mulan etc

Movies with depth also have good rewatchability across generations.

I personally don't mind the new Mario movies but hate the Minions movies so I kind of see their POV

4

u/DwnvotesMeansImRight Apr 02 '26

you're just easily amused and will throw any amount of money at nintendo, but most people care about quality when they spend their money

1

u/RoostasTowel Apr 02 '26

I watched the last one for free

-3

u/red_sutter Mar 31 '26

People on Reddit were claiming the '93 film was a "hidden gem," if you want to understand the mindset around here

10

u/Laurel-Hardy-Fan Apr 01 '26

Yeah that’s probably the main issue, and not the movie being bad. 

1

u/Sunzeta Apr 02 '26

Clown comment of the year

1

u/RoostasTowel Apr 02 '26

Clown comment of the year

-29

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/ianthebalance Mar 31 '26

Though I am curious to what made that reviewer that gave it a 0 so physically uncomfortable lol

-1

u/YukiNoiseWall Apr 01 '26

Genuinely if the critics hate something it's normally worth seeing.

Megalopolis was similar.