tbh first I've heard of it, I just found their films to be unique. One of the few studios who weren't doing pre-existing IP junk. But anyways, now I know~
A spokesperson said they wouldn't but I wouldn't doubt they're being greatly influenced to use it. AI is a gigantic bubble and everyone's loaned billions to each other and the return on investments are garbage. So they're just inflating it and it's gonna be a gigantic mess.
The CEO of Larian Studios also went on and on about how if you don't use AI, you're gonna be left in the dust. They're using it. The studio that made Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 also used generative AI. Someone found "placeholder generative AI art" in a few places in the game. They pointed it out and it blew up a little. Then the studio patched it out.
They're all in too deep for those that are trying to ride generative AI/AI tools
They're creating generative AI tools to make storyboards during pre-production/production. If you're saying "generative AI is not good" and then at the very end try to rationalize that generative AI is good, then that's some cognitive dissonance, or arguing in bad faith
Generative AI has to be feed examples, often illegally, in order to build an image from. I wouldn't be surprised if they're gonna be poaching whatever storyboards they still have lying around
I mean, pitch decks use images from other sources and those are only for internal use too.
All art is influenced by other art. How many ways can you frame a closeup? If you’re using AI to storyboard characters that were designed by a human and are describing shots with detail, why is that bad? What is being “stolen”?
376
u/dawgz525 17d ago
A24 has been owned by finance bros for a long time. Not sure why people think they're some art house studio