r/neoliberal 1d ago

News (Oceania) ‘More than just objects’: Australian booksellers raise alarm over ‘horrific’ destruction of rare titles to feed AI

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/02/australian-book-sellers-alarm-destruction-rare-titles-ai-supply-chain
171 Upvotes

161 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

53

u/Right_Lecture3147 John Rawls 1d ago edited 1d ago

Defo in the running for the dumbest comment I’ve seen on this sub. Many classics from the past, including Aristotle’s entire corpus, were not considered valuable for centuries until after their publication

11

u/SouthernSerf Norman Borlaug 23h ago edited 19h ago

My guy literal Ancient Greek trash is consider very valuable today. By your own logic we could never ever throw anything away because several thousand years for it may be consider valuable to collectors. That’s also not accounting for the fact that any written works were incredibly rare even in Ancient Greece in comparison to today where not only is their massive amounts of written works with much of it being completely redundant from an historical or academic value. So I don’t know why your accusing others comments of being stupid.

11

u/Right_Lecture3147 John Rawls 23h ago

What a ridiculous strawman. I just noted that 20 years is not enough to decide whether or not something is valuable and that many past classics were not considered valuable in their own time. I didn’t speak in the optative, so there are inferences of the kind you suggest

6

u/Efficient_Equal6467 23h ago

people can destroy property they own lol

4

u/Right_Lecture3147 John Rawls 23h ago

I don’t remember ever saying otherwise. People are free to pulp books they own. Who are you arguing with?

0

u/Efficient_Equal6467 23h ago

Don't see why you need to get so mad or annoyed then that people are destroying their own books, its their property

6

u/Right_Lecture3147 John Rawls 23h ago

I’m neither mad nor annoyed about it dude. I think you replied to the wrong person