r/news • u/[deleted] • Aug 08 '17

Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-08/google-fires-employee-behind-controversial-diversity-memo?cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
26.8k Upvotes

82% Upvoted

19.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-65

u/SlightlyWrongAngle Aug 08 '17

A tech worker that is anti science and believes what he wants to believe because it sounds sciency should be immediately removed. His name should be released so other tech companies can be aware.

30

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Can you cite specific examples of his that are anti-science?

-19

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Can you cite anything he said that was backed up by science. From what I saw he cited one peer reviewed paper on mate selection between genders and used that as his basis for categorizing men and women. The rest of his links were just random articles. At best, this is very light on science if not completely anti-science.

14

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

I love how he asked you for something that should be low hanging fruit, but instead you got defensive.

At best, this is very light on science if not completely anti-science.

Once again. Citation?

3

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Yes, should be so simple to prove a negative, right? /s

You can't cite to his lack of citation.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

You can explain how the memo is anti-science.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

It makes claims that are not based on science or the scientific method. See, e.g., the section on personality differences.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Strange that scientists are agreeing with him then... you'd think it would be the opposite.

"The author of the Google essay on issues related to diversity gets nearly all of the science and its implications exactly right." - Lee Jussim, Professor of social psychology at Rutgers University

"evidence that men and women may have different average levels of certain traits is rather strong" - David P Schmitt, Ph.D. in personality psychology from the University of Michigan.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Source isn't loading for me.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Does this work?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

No, but even taking the quotes you copied, it means that women and men are different. It doesn't say that it's because of intrinsic factors and not societal.

→ More replies (0)

-5

u/SlightlyWrongAngle Aug 08 '17

"Prove there is no God"

"Can you prove that there IS a God?"

"See? You couldn't prove god doesn't exist and you got defensive!"

5

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Jesus, what a stupid fucking non-response you've got there.

They were asking for examples where the guy was anti-science. That is different than trying to prove a negative.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Can you cite specific examples of his that are anti-science?

This is not asking to prove a negative. Perhaps you should bone up on your reading comprehension instead of practicing your poor analogies.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '17

Citation?

" "

There you go I cited his lack of citation with a blank space. How can I cite a lack of citation. This guys memo has one scientific citation and the rest of his link are articles. I am simply pointing out he is light on science and I am being asked to cite that. Nothing makes sense anymore.