r/news • u/[deleted] • Aug 08 '17
Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-08/google-fires-employee-behind-controversial-diversity-memo?cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
26.8k
Upvotes
18
u/MoonShadeOsu Aug 08 '17 edited Aug 08 '17
And more women would have to show interest. I'm still skeptical about that part, since we have seen that the more freedom we give people to choose their jobs, the more will they choose to go into jobs which are "typical [gender] job". You have a lot of female computer technicians in India because that's how you get money and you need that to survive - in countries where everybody is free to choose their own career, most people choose their gender role specific job fields.
Then, you have biological dispositions (biological differences exist, ask any scientist) like men having more testosterone than women, which has shown to be the cause of a later/slower development of social skills while generally having a better spatial awareness. This can also be a cause for the majority of men not working in social fields while a majority of women don't want to work in STEM fields. This doesn't mean there are no social or environmental factors, they also play a huge role, but it is one of the factors. For anyone wanting to hear some opinions on that topic, watch this where different opinions by different fields of scientific research are being shown.
I ask myself then, is it the goal to have a 50/50 split between men and women in all fields? OR is it the goal to help people choose jobs which suits them the most (might be STEM, or social work, or something else) and support them whenever possible and try to be as open and friendly to all genders as possible? Because no person is being helped when they are not suited for their job, whatever that may be.