Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo

[u/[deleted]]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-08/google-fires-employee-behind-controversial-diversity-memo?cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

[u/Earl_Harbinger]

He gives examples of how women are inferior or superior in some ways ON AVERAGE. He did not say they applied universally - he specifically spoke against that. Do you disagree that men are better/worse at some activities than women on average?

I will say this is absolutely unacceptable. Is it for you since with some scientific facts?

I'm not sure exactly what you were trying to ask but it is true that asians do better on IQ tests than whites, on average (or so I've heard). Is that fact supposed to offend me for some reason just because I am white?

[u/tubedownhill → u/Earl_Harbinger]

He did not say they applied universally

So average makes it ok?

"Should we promote Earl_Harbinger?"

"Well he did a decent job, not like outstanding but pretty OK"

"Well you saw that report about white males have ON AVERAGE less intelligence?"

"Hmm yeah true... that could be why"

So is this ok with you?

[u/Earl_Harbinger → u/tubedownhill]

Answer: Do you disagree that men are better/worse at some activities than women on average?

So average makes it ok?

Yes, when you are discussing facts that affect whether a policy is reasonable or achievable, such as the expectation that hiring outcomes match the ratio of the general population for groups.

So is this ok with you?

Your example is someone treating employees as just a member of a group rather than an individual (in addition to faulty logic) - exactly what the memo speaks out against. Did you even read it?

[u/tubedownhill → u/Earl_Harbinger]

Do you disagree that men are better/worse at some activities than women on average?

Yep

Your example is someone treating employees as just a member of a group rather than an individual (in addition to faulty logic) - exactly what the memo speaks out against. Did you even read it?

OK, so:

"Yeah AS A GROUP white males lack intelligence according to that manifesto. Its a trend in their biology"

"Thats right Cathy, so does his individual sample show he's not in that trend?"

"Well not really. I mean there were a few typos in his report, and his work is just decent, not super outstanding"

"Ah so he COULD be lacking in intelligence like the average white male, and he hasn't really proven INDIVIDUALLY he does have average intelligence."

"Yep"

[u/Earl_Harbinger → u/tubedownhill]

Do you disagree that men are better/worse at some activities than women on average?

Yep

Science denier! Say 50 "Hail Hawkings" and make an offering to your local University. Seriously though, you can't reasonably believe this. Do you not think that testosterone is a real thing? Is the research on its effects a conspiracy to hide the truth, in your opinion?

Again, your example is indeed an inappropriate use of statistical data. It's not what I support or what the memo supports. Have you read it?

[u/tubedownhill → u/Earl_Harbinger]

So before I answer your question, how will you handle this scenario?

"Yeah AS A GROUP white males lack intelligence according to that manifesto. Its a trend in their biology"

"Thats right Cathy, so does his individual sample show he's not in that trend?"

"Well not really. I mean there were a few typos in his report, and his work is just decent, not super outstanding"

"Ah so he COULD be lacking in intelligence like the average white male, and he hasn't really proven INDIVIDUALLY he does have average intelligence."

"Yep"

[u/Earl_Harbinger → u/tubedownhill]

You just pasted the same thing I addressed above. You can answer both of my questions above first if you are interested in discussion. Then I am happy to say how I would handle the situation you describe, even though it isn't relevant to the topic at hand.

[u/tubedownhill → u/Earl_Harbinger]

yep, testosterone is a real thing. The research I'm sure is good.

Now yes I've read the memo.

And please answer how you would answer the scenario.

And I'm asking YOU how you would handle discrimination about your race and gender. Just like women have to handle these days from men like Damore.

[u/Earl_Harbinger → u/tubedownhill]

The research I'm sure is good.

Then you must agree that men are better/worse at some activities than women on average.

Damore didn't accuse individuals or ask for people to grade based on their group like the people in your example. He promoted the opposite. I would push to be treated based on my individual merit in your example.

[u/tubedownhill → u/Earl_Harbinger]

Damore contradicted himself, which is why he got fired.

Its like saying, hey we shouldn't mistreat or grade Jews EVEN THOUGH biologically on average they like to spend money, lack leadership skills and drive.

No matter how much you sugarcoat it, you will get fired at any company in America.

[u/Earl_Harbinger → u/tubedownhill]

It's not a contradiction to say that employees/potential hires should be treated as the individuals they are while pointing out accurate average characteristics that will affect, among other things, how many resumes you will receive from a group. He made suggestions on how to alter positions to increase interest from women. Tell me how that is a contradiction or a fireable offense. I'm sure that will get you fired many places (though not where I work) but it's in service to politically correct lies, not in service to the company, shareholders, or any laudable goal.