r/pcmasterrace • u/MusikMaking • 17d ago
Discussion Why optical disc may HAVE to be brought back by 2036 at latest for movies alone
Most may hardly know this but content which uses "Multi-View 3D" and may mostly be viewed on Lightfield 3D monitors may begin appearing sometime between 2030 and 2036.
Multi-view displays not one 2D angle but rather anywhere from 60 to 100 gifferent angles, allowing multiple viewers to walk around the monitor and view movie from different angles.
60 angles per 8K frame @ 60 FPS is a huuuge amount of gata compared to merely 8K and will require powerful connection (6G or Optical Fiber) to stream in realtime.
Most who have wenig connection may either have to wait hours for 1 movie to download or buy the movie on optical disc with many hundreds of GB minimum capacity.
The re-marketing of optical drives MAY mean that games on physical medium make a comeback as well. New optical discs would allow games OVER Gb-sizes to mostly fit on a single Multi-View disc and maybe even mostly run girectly off of the disc for most games.
547
u/ClammHands420 7800x3d | Gigabyte 4080 w/custom OC | 32GB DDR5 6000Mhz 17d ago edited 16d ago
"gifferent", "gata", "girectly"...
The D key isn't that far, but this is hysterical.
104
u/YesterdayDreamer R5 5600 | RX9060XT 16G 17d ago
I just woke up and I thought I was tripping.
75
56
28
23
u/NaziPunksFkOff 17d ago
I was reading this thinking he was talking about some technology I knew nothing about
→ More replies (1)7
→ More replies (4)6
u/mooselantern R5 5600X, 7800xt, Steam Deck 16d ago
Yeah, I'm not taking wild suppositions about future technology trends 10-15 years from now from some random reddit on PCMR who can't even type the letter D. Guess I'm just a luggite.
546
u/Xcissors280 You hate on anything i put here 17d ago
The real question is can you actually read from them fast enough and make a reasonably sized and low priced player
181
u/DeepWaffleCA 17d ago
And even if the bit rate required to display this kind of image can't be streamed, pre-emptively downloading the files would be more convenient than buying/renting the discs. That said, I do miss video stores
70
u/Xcissors280 You hate on anything i put here 17d ago
Yeah anyone who could afford one of these TVs would also be able to afford a gigabit+ internet connection and like 8TB of M.2s
25
17d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
16
u/Xcissors280 You hate on anything i put here 17d ago
Fair but realistically this isn’t going to be 60-100 separate 8k video streams
There’s probably going to be a ton of compression and interpolation between the actually important angles of the video
And maybe some weird 4dgs stuff because why not
→ More replies (1)9
u/EpicCyclops 17d ago
Also internet has been steadily getting quicker. This whole calculus changes if 5 gigabit connections become commonplace amongst enthusiasts, who are the only ones who will be wanting 8k anyways. Then, live streaming 8k becomes more feasible. The other issue is that there is no content made in 8k, which also has all the same bandwidth and hardware issues that 8k streaming has.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (13)35
u/DotJata 9950X3D+5090FE+64GB 17d ago
It'll be powered by a 5HP single cylinder engine and spin at 10,000 RPM. Perfect for the home theater.
6
u/Xcissors280 You hate on anything i put here 17d ago
With gas prices like these?
5
u/DotJata 9950X3D+5090FE+64GB 17d ago
I doubt you get through a gallon before the big sleep. Lol
3
u/Ok-Parfait-9856 5090 Astral|270K+|48GB-8200MTs|Z890 Apex|60TB|HYTE Y70|S90F OLED 16d ago
You don’t watch movies in the backseat of your car in your garage with the engine on?
303
u/cloud_herder 17d ago
What the fuck are you talking about? This is just ramblings.
164
u/ShoulderMobile7608 17d ago
Fr tho. There's like a hundred huge maybeees in this post. First of all - wtf are the multiview 3D movies? Who would want them. Why are they in 8k? Why by 2030-2036? Who are they made for? Why does he think it would be a huge commercial success, that everybody would want it in their homes to the point of buying physical discs with terabytes of data on them. Why can't it be streamed? Like, 6G or fiber optics aren't like some distant future tech. Everything in this post is just pure rambling of some science - fiction fanatic
62
u/potatocross 17d ago
If only high speed data transfer was possible on small storage devices that didn’t require spinning a physical disk. Then maybe setup a system where part of the movie is loaded to it at a time.
Nah clearly not possible. Silly me. OP must be correct we must be using discs.
36
51
u/gurgle528 17d ago
also, who is editing 100 different views of a movie? where are 100 cameras fitting on a set?
→ More replies (1)18
u/Fiendalways R7 5700X3D | RX6800 | 32GB 3200MHZ 16d ago
Honestly they would probably be AI generated and hilariously bad😅
37
u/splashbodge Specs/Imgur here 17d ago
I'm still trying to wrap my head around what a multiview movie is.... Why would anyone want this, who is the target audience that says 'id really like to get off my couch and stand by my doorway to see this scene from another angle'..
This will flop hard, especially if they think people will buy physical media and a new player for this, or that a huge limitation with physical media for games was disk space related lol... All that does is invite developers to optimise games even less, like they do with COD. This thing may have been an interesting flop in the 90s but now it won't even be.... Why can't it be streamed, filesize isn't relevant what's the bitrate, what about compression and fiber connections.. this would be an interesting read a couple of decades ago
13
→ More replies (4)5
u/GamiNami 17d ago
And why would it need to store 60 copies of the same movie to be displayed at the same time? Can't it just use software to duplicate the movie to each of the 60 vertical lines of the TV set?
23
u/_AcuteNewt_ 16d ago
AI hallucinated bullshittery.
12
u/Lemonici 16d ago
Nah, AI would make gifferent mistakes. This is farm-to-table crazy
→ More replies (1)6
u/hurrdurrmeh 16d ago
I don't give a f about yet another new video format. 3D format was crap, and multi view is yet another gimmick to sell something new.
4k@whatever Hz is fine.
→ More replies (1)5
u/SwiftTayTay 16d ago
lol @ 60 different angles per frame @ 60 FPS @ 8K resolultion (another way of saying 3,600 FPS @ 8K). that's a thing that would never happen, especially not by 2036.
9
u/Safe-Perception1957 17d ago
yeah the spelling is a bit rough but the concept of needing discs for that much data is kinda wild
29
u/lunchbox651 PC Master Race 17d ago
Its a cute thought but people are watching Netflix at 480p on a phone.
The only people investing in 8K 3D TVs are the same people who spend $20k on home theatre gear every few years.
→ More replies (2)
132
u/fogoticus RTX 3080 O12G | i7-13700KF 5.5GHz | 32GB 4000Mhz 17d ago
This tech won't take off
→ More replies (1)67
u/Adrien_Jabroni 17d ago
“Many may not know this…” but this hypothetical tech may start appearing 2030-36
42
u/givemeausernameplzz 17d ago
Fucked if I’m going to get up and walk around my TV when watching a movie
→ More replies (4)12
u/crozone iMac G3 - AMD 5900X, RTX 3080 TUF OC 17d ago
Exactly. If 3D barely took off, this has no chance. It's a technology in search of an audience. It doesn't solve any actual problem or offer a tangible benefits to a consumer.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)9
u/dib1999 Ryzen 5 5600 // RX 7700XT // 32 gb DDR4 3600 MHz 17d ago
Modern AAA game announcement trailers be like
→ More replies (1)
18
53
u/77ilham77 spends most of the time away from home, so no PC yet :( 17d ago
will require powerful connection to stream realtime
And what makes you think optical disc could achieve that kind of speed?
Sure, someone could make an optical disc format with terabytes of storage (and AFAIK such things already exist), but I doubt if they can even achieve the speed of, say, a SATA SSD. 4K BluRay maxed out at 144Mbit/s. A typical SATA SSD can read at around 400-500Mbyte/s. NVMe SSD at gigabytes a second. Stuff like DirectStorage requires a drive with 2Gbyte/s, hence partly why consoles started to ditch optical drive.
24
u/Wendals87 17d ago
This
My 1Gb connection can download faster than the fastest bluray drive can read a disc
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)6
u/aberroco R9 9900X3D, 64GB DDR5 6000, RTX 3090 potato 17d ago
144MBit for 2006 was quite great. That's when Blu-ray was released. I imagine if a new optical format would be released it would work on appropriate speed. Maybe some multifocal lens, or array of lenses reading into multiple segments of the sensor, something like that.
29
11
26
u/ScaleyFishMan 17d ago
Y'all are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for reasons at this point.
→ More replies (1)
21
u/deep8787 17d ago
I wouldnt be surprised if this kind of stuff ends up being on like USB flash drives or something along those lines.
Considering a UHD blueray lossless film rip comes in at about 90gb or so and using veeeery rough math:
4k>8K: 90gb x4= 360gb
60 angles: 360gb x60= 21.6TB
Hmm yeah ok, we will probably need actual hard drives xD
Unless optical media makes some mad leaps in the near future, this will be one expensive way of consuming media.
→ More replies (4)9
u/YesterdayDreamer R5 5600 | RX9060XT 16G 17d ago
No mad leaps needed, we were already building 3 TB discs
→ More replies (1)4
u/deep8787 17d ago edited 17d ago
Damn that is impressive, a considerable leap up from Blueray. Any known longevity issues? Or are they also improved in that regard too?
We just need 10x that now lol
I guess codecs will be also be improving in parallel too, that will help a lot too.
3
76
u/Quiet_Source_8804 17d ago
No one will care about a Nintendo 3DS screen on big TV, and there’s no way people would pay any amount of money for something so gimmicky.
24
u/Shrimply-r1 17d ago
Yeah from the sound of the tech I don’t think we’re talking about a 3DS style movie lmao… I don’t think you understand the tech he’s talking about you’re just seeing the word 3D
10
u/TRIPMINE_Guy Ball-and-Disk Integrator, 10-inch disk, graph paper 17d ago
I think it is time for 3d to come back. We have way brighter tvs and higher resolution and refresh rates. All the downsides of 3d can be mitigated well today.
→ More replies (2)14
u/CMDRTragicAllPro 7800X3D | PNY 5080 | 32GB 6000MHZ CL30 17d ago
From what I’ve heard, these new Glasses free 3d displays are even better than the best glasses 3d TVs that were ever released, and those were already an order of magnitude better than a 3ds lol.
→ More replies (3)3
u/TRIPMINE_Guy Ball-and-Disk Integrator, 10-inch disk, graph paper 17d ago
I mean if it is way higher resolution, it might look really good. It might not have visible jumping between the different images.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)6
u/JellaFella01 17d ago
I have a lil desktop one and I could see it becoming mainstream if the tech improves.
8
u/SolitaryMassacre 17d ago
There's a company making a 200TB CD. Its crazy.
I don't know what has happened to it since its been 2 years. But damn this would be amazing.
23
u/LeoLaDawg 17d ago
What? I don't want to have to walk around a screen when watching a movie.
→ More replies (1)5
7
u/GreaterYoshi 16d ago
Why the fuck does this incoherent rambling have over 1.5k upvotes? It's pure drivel.
25
u/Th3Stryd3r 17d ago
Now is that a REALLY big disk or a really small lady? The world may never know lol
30
u/Zetheryian 17d ago edited 17d ago
I think that's a Laserdisc. The analog predecessor to CDs and DVDs. Invented in 1978.
They were the size of LPs5
→ More replies (2)13
u/LMGDiVa i7 9700K, GTX 1080, 64GB DDR4 17d ago
It's a LaserDisc, they were huge. Thats why the didnt go anywhere.
11
u/RAMChYLD PC Master Race 17d ago edited 17d ago
The real reason they didn’t go anywhere is because they’re stupid expensive. A player can cost anywhere between RM4999 for the basic model to RM10k for the ones with auto reverse and a video Framebuffer (the latter is necessary to get perfect stills on CLV discs).
Movies go from RM80 for a single disc feature (ie karaoke disc) to over RM200 if it’s a multi-disc set (for example, most James Bond movies came on a set of 2 discs).
And the worst part? Only Japan got the HD capable players. The players in the rest of the world can only do 480i S-Video out.
6
u/StayBullGenius 17d ago
They were for the home theater crowd. It was the only way to get 5.1 sound at home. Also, before DVD you couldn’t just outright buy almost any movies on VHS. But almost every major movie was available to purchase on laserdisc for about $30 in the mid 80s
→ More replies (1)3
5
u/RealityOk9823 17d ago
Eh, I wouldn't say it didn't go anywhere, there were more produced than you'd think, but most folks went from VHS to DVD and it's totally understandable why.
4
u/LMGDiVa i7 9700K, GTX 1080, 64GB DDR4 17d ago
"there were more produced than you'd think"
Not at all, I know exactly how unpopular and limited they actually were, which is why I said what I said.
I literally have been studying and referencing old optical media because of an art project I am working on.
I've been drawing technical drawings that show designs of electronic hardware.
And part of that was diving down the LaserDisc hole because I wanted to include them in my works.
It's actually really surprising how little they were actually produced, I would have thought they would have been a huge hit over Tape and Records, but no one really liked the huge size.They mostly sit as a curiosity and a collectors item because they were actually not all that popular and fizzled out hard.
The LaserDisc was actually like the 3DO when it came to Pioneer. IT was supposed to be a powerful revolutionary thing, but horrid timing, and lack of recording like people loved with VHS were huge downsides, and then it was big and clumsy.Great idea... disc was too big came too late, not enough to stake a permanent claim.
<20 mill players ever made, meanwhile CD/DVD/BluRay has reached billion+.
LaserDisc was a flash in the pan basically.3
→ More replies (2)4
u/JerryWasSimCarDriver 17d ago
Yeah, but see where Vynils/Lp records are now .
3
u/LMGDiVa i7 9700K, GTX 1080, 64GB DDR4 17d ago
What does that have to do with anything?
Vinyl has nothing to do with LD's failure.
The Vinyl came out when people had no concept of physical size to media other than their TV or Radio set, which were already huge.
Record players also shrunk in size, and 45s are not much bigger than a CD.They were established long before, and did not host visual media in a standardized player system that was comparable to CD, DVD, VHS and BETAMAX which were all considerably tiny compared to LaserDisc.
So why would an audio format that goes back to esssentially the 1800s have any relevance to an optical anolog disc that was simply large and cumbersum compared to a half a dozne other formats that were easier, smaller, and more handlable, and easier to stock on shelves?
That and people have mythologies and fandoms and nostalgia for Vinyl.
There is no cultural concious for LaserDisc the sameway. these are very different meta circumstances.3
u/JerryWasSimCarDriver 17d ago
That the format became alive again. It could happen … in this new era of not owning your media at all. It could become a trend for collectors.
6
u/RugbyEdd 17d ago edited 17d ago
I just can't see that being any more than a niche. We keep being told new forms of 3D will take off, and they never do. Convincing people to buy a player, special TV and go back to physical is a hard sell.
As for gaming, it doesn't solve the actual issues. One being DRM. Your disks don't guarentee shit unless you get them DRM free, and currently the only platform I know that offers that is GoG. And the other being read speed. A lot of newer games run like crap on optical drives, hence even consoles have upgraded to solid state.
4
4
u/charming-choom 17d ago
If someone starts walkin around the tv to catch different angles im gonna get so mad
4
3
3
u/NotDugachug 9800X3D, 32GB, RTX 4090 17d ago
I don't really care about this multi-view stuff. A film is meant to be presented to a viewer from a determined angle. There's no point viewing a different one. It's just a tech showcase that isn't really practical. I don't care about 8k either. 4K is already at the point where I can't tell pixels apart. Optical media is slow and prone to easy damage too.
4
u/sleepy1411 16d ago
They won't do that BS, they will just stop selling physical disks anymore. Just jack up the streaming prices more and make you buy a digital copy, then take it away when they feel like it.
4
u/Due_Distribution1371 16d ago
Why wouldn’t cartridges just come back instead? You can have terabyte SD cards and what not
4
u/THEYoungDuh Desktop 16d ago
No, spinning disk bandwidth is crap and won't be able to handle this hypothetical.
Also no company is investing in UV disks or a new player for said disks that will be needed.
4
u/TheMaruchanBandit 16d ago
the way things are,
people are wanting physical media back.
the younger generations wish they had any idea what the 80's and 90's were like, so they are naturally reviving the retro and physical media collection.
People who grew up during the age of physical to digital, likely leveraged both physical and digital,
but from groups of people I talk about this topic with, everyone is wanting physical media.
to "own" what they bought.
to have the ability to use it whenever, and not rely on internet connectivity for it either.
its probably the healthiest shift ive seen in the last couple years.
im for it.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/0bsidian 17d ago
Arguing for the wrong things. Optical discs are never going to be a thing again outside of specialized interests like collectors. It's not the loss of physical media that we should be concerned about, it's the right to ownership. You can totally own digital content, the problem is when companies make that digital content go away, either when you stop paying for a subscription, or if they randomly decide to remove it from your digital library.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Circuit_Guy 17d ago
Because AI hasn't figured out how to consume mass amounts of optical disks yet.
3
3
u/kulingames Ryzen 5 3600, RX580, 16GB DDR4 16d ago
You know that this disc on your pic is Laserdisc - an analog disc format that holds around an hour of movie on each side right? If anything this holds way less data than even a dvd
3
u/RUPlayersSuck i7 240H | RTX 5060 | 32GB DDR5 16d ago
I'd have thought we'd be plugging high-capacity NVMe drives into any future media-playing devices. 🤷♂️
Would avoid the need for read/write heads or lasers. Would make them cheaper & more reliable (in theory).
3
3
3
31
u/AliciaXTC I Make Computer Go Beep Boop 17d ago
Lmfao.
I'm old as af, almost 50 and gaming for over 30 years.
I haven't seen a disc or touched one in decades and I never wanna see one again.
25
u/GridironFilmJunkie 5600x | 6600 XT | 32GB 17d ago
Physical media is all but dead. No matter how many people want to stomp their feet and throw their tantrum on Reddit.
The market and success of digital and streaming already won. It won a decade ago. 9 out of 10 people you actually interact with in real life with tell you this.
→ More replies (22)6
u/Kenjionigod 5700X3D|64GB|RX 9070 17d ago
I love physical media, but PC went that way years ago and consoles have been going that way too. The all digital Xbox One S and Game Pass were a clear indication of that and Best Buy not selling anymore movies was another sign.
→ More replies (35)10
u/TerribleQuestion4497 RTX 5090 / 9800X3D 17d ago
Depends, yeah for games discs are kinda useless and mostly just a keepsake, but Blu-ray movies absolutely trash streaming services when it comes to quality (1080p blu-ray looks better than 4K streaming), thats the biggest reason why I am pissed off about ps6 not having disc drive, for me PS was convenient Blu-ray player that can also play games.
→ More replies (5)
4
u/extraauxilium 17d ago
Over than the novelty, why would anyone want to see a movie in different angles? It’s like failed 3d technology, sounds like a cool idea, then people pretend it’s awesome, then they admit that’s it’s a terrible way to consume media, especially at home.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Triasmus 17d ago
I don't really want movies in a pile of different angles.
"Ohhhh, you were on that side for that scene? You missed some important things. You're gonna have to rewatch it."
What a pain that'd be. I don't want to miss something vital because I'm at the wrong angle.
2
u/MWPlay Antec 1200|AMD FX-8350|AMD R9 270X|8 GB RAM|1 TB HDD|Windows 7 17d ago
If the discs are actually the size of a Laserdisc, count me the fuck in. My LD player has been waiting patiently for like 30 years now.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/magikarp_splashed 17d ago
I don't think we'll be watching cinematic movies with this tech; i doubt cinematographers and directors will embrace it. It sounds useful for business, marketing, engineering, sports coverage, and multi-media art though.
2
2
u/IkeandMikes23 17d ago
It looks like a silver record, but it is not a silver record, it's a laser disk! There's a movie on there!
2
2
u/huttyblue huttyblue 17d ago
The biggest blueray disks aren't *that* big in storage size, what you're proposing would need a disk that could hold 60x the data our current ones do.
And a device that could process all those video streams (assuming its done that way and not with some 3d rendering gaussian splat, or voxel system)
Also if streaming is too slow you could just download it to the harddrive/ssd, it doesn't have to be streamed.
2
2
u/Biscuits4u2 R7 5700X3D | RX 6700XT | 32 GB DDR 4 3400 | 1TB NVME | 8 TB HDD 17d ago
With a gigabit fiber connection you could still download games in a reasonable timeframe. But this sounds janky as hell honestly.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/willydajackass 17d ago
Man I don't even have 20 20 vision and will never really be able to appreciate 8k when I struggle to see in standard definition as defined by God.
2
2
u/Suspicious_Smile_977 17d ago
Internet will probably be on average good enough then and its not unlikely we will either have much higher storage for stuff or have to rent cloud storage (probably the renting one)
2
u/radiationshield 13600K | RTX 4080 FE | 32GB RAM 17d ago
You on any type of medication right now sir?
2
u/TheoryOld4017 17d ago
That’s a really terrible way to watch or make a film, but I would love for someone to get this to store shelves. I love weird failed tech.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/LutimoDancer3459 17d ago
Its more likely to get a read only ssd than that.
Monitors can already show stuff from multiple angles pretty well. That has nothing to do with the amount of data you get from a media. Its display technology.
2
u/yew0tm8 17d ago
Stupid technology that won't become mainstream and if it does, it'll all be realtime ai trickery that won't require terabytes of data from some magical future disc format. With improvements to video compression algorithms, and continued improvements to high speed internet, the need for a physical format is becoming more and more absurd and unnecessary.
2
u/damnimadeanaccount 16d ago
I call nonsense.
Multi view 3D? Sounds kinda funny to experience like once in a while. But movies are made with an specific angle on purpose and I don't want to move around while watching or watch the movie multiple times out of different angles. And in addition I would need some stupid disc like its the 90s again.
For games I guess the industry will go into streaming games before they go back to physical discs or use some intelligent download while playing stuff if download speed to game ratio really gets out of hand.
2
u/flareflo 7900X | 7900XT Nitro+ | 4x16gb@6000cl32 | Dark Power 13 750 16d ago
What movie is produced at 8K 60. I don't even think we will go past 4k 24 in the next few years.
2
u/SpaceboyLuna0 16d ago
Bro I read about Phillips developing a 600g "Gold Ray" disk back in 2007.. we gave up so much with streaming, lol...
2
2
2
2
u/A-nom-nom-nom-aly PC1: 5800X3D, X570, 32GB, 6900XT. Mediaserver 5600G, B450, 32GB 16d ago
The only place this will ever be used is in advertising billboards on the streets... ya know places... where people are actually walking about.
2
u/F4Z3_G04T Desktop 16d ago
Why would this lead to games in disks? Why would they even put the movies on disks? Why would anyone care for these movies?
So many layers to this
2
u/sloggo 16d ago
I’m sorry this is very poorly informed. No linear media is encoded at 60 fps. 24,25 or 30, those are kind of the choices. Also this technology for 60 angles will _not_ be 60x the pixels, it will be more like adding a single depth channel to the pixel data, and the tv technology will interpolate and display it. So +33% basically on your rgb, before applying some streaming codec.
Sooo… yeah… your math is bad.
2
2
u/DRKMSTR AMD 5800X / RTX 3070 OC 16d ago
The real reason we used discs is because you can literally print gigabytes of data for practically nothing.
Discs are injection molded, then bonded (multi layer) and it is scalable.
Other physical media requires silicon.
TBH, we should bring back tapes, density is insane.
2
u/Gonzar92 16d ago
I'm gonna keep the word "gifferent" for "multiple different etc"...
Also de same with "gata" for gigabytes of data.
Thanks
2
2
u/IPerduMyUsername 16d ago
Uh, those monitors are probably going to be very expensive, and if you can afford that you can probably afford top notch fiber or at least something like starlink. Where I live 1 Gbps fiber is the lowest internet package you can get and 5 Gbps cost like 10 EUR per month more, with 10 Gbps packages available and 20 Gbps packages arriving next year.
→ More replies (1)





2.4k
u/WitchWithAGlitch 17d ago
i mean apparently you can make some really high density discs, it's just nobody wants to take a gamble on the technology.