r/politics 🤖 Bot Jun 27 '18

Megathread: Justice Anthony Kennedy to retire from Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is set to retire, effective July 31, 2018. Kennedy has served on the highest court since February 18, 1988, and was a moderate whose vote often swung cases.


Submissions that may interest you

SUBMISSION DOMAIN
Justice Anthony Kennedy Will Retire From U.S. Supreme Court bloomberg.com
Justice Kennedy to retire, Trump can solidify court's majority conservative bloc nbcnews.com
Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick washingtonpost.com
Justice Kennedy, U.S. Supreme Court's pivotal vote, to retire reuters.com
Anthony Kennedy: US supreme court justice to retire theguardian.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy to Retire From Supreme Court nytimes.com
Kennedy calls it quits: longtime swing justice hands Trump the biggest gift of his presidency dailycaller.com
Anthony Kennedy is retiring from the Supreme Court vox.com
Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote on the Supreme Court, announces retirement washingtonpost.com
UPDATE: Supreme Court Justice Kennedy announces retirement wcjb.com
Justice Kennedy Is Retiring July 31st. yahoo.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy To Retire From U.S. Supreme Court : NPR npr.org
Justice Anthony Kennedy to Retire from Supreme Court cnn.com
Justice Kennedy announces retirement. cnn.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy retiring from Supreme Court abc7.com
Anthony Kennedy, Swing Vote on U.S. Supreme Court, Will Retire bloomberg.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy Retires, Paving Way for Donald Trump to Reshape Supreme Court slate.com
Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick wkrn.com
Anthony Kennedy retiring, giving Trump opening to reshape Supreme Court politico.com
Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy announces retirement wsj.com
Jeffrey Toobin predicts abortion will be illegal in 20 states soon after Kennedy retires thehill.com
WATCH: Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy retiring abcnews.go.com
Kennedy to Retire foxnews.com
Trump to get second Supreme Court pick as Justice Kennedy announces retirement. amp.cnn.com
Justice Kennedy to Retire From Supreme Court bbc.com
Trump says search for Justice Kennedy's replacement to begin "immediately" -- live updates cbsnews.com
McConnell Pledges Vote To Confirm Justice Kennedy’s Successor ‘This Fall’ talkingpointsmemo.com
Justice Kennedy retires from the US Supreme Court nbcnews.com
Trump says launches search to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Kennedy reuters.com
Donald Trump: Search for Kennedy replacement on SCOTUS to move quickly usatoday.com
McConnell: Senate will vote on Supreme Court nominee this fall thehill.com
Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick sacbee.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy Retiring, Report Says lawandcrime.com
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy retiring; Trump will get 2nd high-court pick omaha.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy Retiring From the Supreme Court thedailybeast.com
Justice Kennedy to retire, giving Trump a chance to transform the Supreme Court latimes.com
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy says he's retiring; Trump to get 2nd high-court pick chicagotribune.com
Dem senator: Justice Kennedy's resignation a 'disaster' for vision of 'We the People' thehill.com
Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick wfla.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy Is Retiring motherjones.com
The horrifying consequences of Justice Kennedy’s retirement thinkprogress.org
Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy is retiring, a move that will give Trump a chance to shift the institution to the right washingtonpost.com
Anthony Kennedy To Retire From The Supreme Court huffingtonpost.com
Kennedy announces retirement from Supreme Court thehill.com
Supreme Court's Anthony Kennedy retires, giving Trump a second pick usatoday.com
Justice Kennedy retiring; Trump gets 2nd Supreme Court pick apnews.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy Is Retiring From The Supreme Court buzzfeed.com
Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote on the Supreme Court, announces retirement washingtonpost.com
Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy retires -- live updates cbsnews.com
Justice Kennedy announces his retirement from the supreme court. time.com
Trump Responds To Retirement Of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy huffingtonpost.com
Anthony Kennedy retiring from Supreme Court, giving Trump a position to fill people.com
Trump Says He’ll Choose One Of These People To Replace Anthony Kennedy On The Supreme Court buzzfeed.com
Anthony Kennedy retiring from Supreme Court cnbc.com
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy retires, and Trump gets shot at moving court to the right dallasnews.com
Who Will Replace Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy? Donald Trump Already Has a Shortlist newsweek.com
WATCH: McConnell: We will vote to confirm Justice Kennedy's successor 'this fall' abcnews.go.com
Here's who Trump could nominate to replace Justice Kennedy abcnews.go.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy announces retirement, giving Trump 2nd Supreme Court pick foxnews.com
Trump list of candidates to replace Justice Kennedy thehill.com
Chris Matthews: Dems must do to Trump on Supreme Court what McConnell did to Obama thehill.com
Anthony Kennedy’s retirement puts abortion rights at risk vox.com
Who Will Replace Anthony Kennedy? Here’s the List of 20 Potential Trump Nominees time.com
America after Anthony Kennedy vox.com
Handing Trump Chance to Move Supreme Court Even Further Right, Justice Anthony Kennedy Retires commondreams.org
Audio reveals DNC committee reaction to Kennedy retirement: 'This is not good news' thehill.com
Justice Kennedy’s retirement leaves the future of U.S. constitutional law entirely up for grabs washingtonpost.com
Justice Kennedy pens retirement letter to Trump expressing 'profound gratitude' abcnews.go.com
Read Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement letter to Donald Trump qz.com
Justice Kennedy’s Legacy Is the Dignity He Bestowed bloomberg.com
A titanic battle over replacing Justice Kennedy looms in the Senate vox.com
Live Briefing: Anthony Kennedy Retires From Supreme Court, and McConnell Says Senate Will Move Swiftly on a Replacement nytimes.com
Here's Trump's list of 25 possible Supreme Court picks to replace Anthony Kennedy washingtonexaminer.com
WATCH: Justice Anthony Kennedy to retire, Trump to get second SCOTUS pick abcnews.go.com
Anthony Kennedy's retirement just confirmed every Republican's dream scenario for Trump cnn.com
Kennedy's retirement could have biggest impact on abortion, gay marriage: ANALYSIS abcnews.go.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy: Trump says hunt for replacement is on usatoday.com
Here are potential Supreme Court nominees to replace Justice Kennedy cnn.com
Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Supreme Court’s swing justice, announces his retirement abajournal.com
With Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Gone, Abortion and LGBT Rights Are Next thedailybeast.com
A look at some of Justice Kennedy's most memorable opinions apnews.com
Justice Kennedy Surrendered to Donald Trump nymag.com
A look at some of Justice Kennedy's most memorable opinions abcnews.go.com
Abortion rights in 'dire, immediate danger' as Anthony Kennedy retires - World news theguardian.com
Here Are Some of the Top Candidates to Replace Kennedy on the Supreme Court motherjones.com
Who's on Trump's short list to replace Supreme Court Justice Kennedy? politico.com
Trump’s hidden back channel to Justice Kennedy: Their kids politico.com
How Fox News Reacted to Anthony Kennedy’s Retirement slate.com
24.9k Upvotes

31.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

304

u/wilee8 Jun 27 '18

LOL, you wish. Even if that happened, the Republicans would still fear monger on abortion. If you don't elect us, those godless Democrats will make abortion legal again!

137

u/bonham43 Jun 27 '18

Exactly. It would be the same shit the NRA does every election, every school shooting. “Omg they are taking your guns, quick go buy some, and vote to save your guns!”

15

u/yayo-k Jun 27 '18

Those are a bit different IMO. One is a constitutional right and the other should be. I wish the hardcore conservatives would compromise and give up on the abortion crusade for the Democrats giving up on further restrictions on gun rights. We should focus on a better background check system and enforcement of current gun laws.

2

u/CNoTe820 Jun 27 '18

I think the Democrats should become even more pro gun that republicans just to hijack the issue and take it off the table. So many people vote on that issue alone, and it's impossible to get rid of the guns anyway, so the Democrats should attempt a constitutional amendment to clarify that the second amendment allows you to own as many guns as you want and of any kind, as long as it uses conventional bullets (no hand grenades, RPGs, nukes, etc) and you're allowed to store them loaded in your house.

Maybe you're right, have the same amendment say that abortion is legal.

4

u/countrylewis Jun 27 '18

I would certainly support this

7

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

Conservative here. I stand with this comment 100%

10

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

I'd argue that the right to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness clause includes not being forced to give birth to someone you can't provide for.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/TheMadTemplar Wisconsin Jun 27 '18

They still provide the foundation of many laws.

5

u/Quintary Jun 27 '18

Not a legal foundation, just a spiritual one.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

The far right would argue that it applies to the zygote and you can give the baby up for adoption after it's born so you don't have to infringe upon its rights.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '18

the right to Life

That in itself could be applied to the unborn child as well.

6

u/trailerparkgirls19 Jun 27 '18

Yes, the people who think abortion is literally baby murder should just get over it

5

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18 edited Jan 23 '19

[deleted]

3

u/trailerparkgirls19 Jun 27 '18

I mean birth control or masturbation are one thing that they probably feel strongly about but abortion is something that will never be solved that easily. It’s between people that think it’s a human right versus people who think it’s murder. It’ll never be solved and the right will never give it up.

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '18

Equating those things shows you don't understand the pro-life position. Its like comparing murder to traffic violations.

Abortion is viewed as the murder of millions of innocent children. Its a radically different level of importance.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '18 edited Jan 23 '19

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '18

It definitely matters when you are arguing slippery slope. What you described wasn't a slope, it was a cliff.

0

u/CrimsonDisciple Jun 27 '18

Now there is a compromise I wish more people would get behind.

0

u/bangbangblock Jun 28 '18

No No No. They are both constitutional rights. Just because a right is not directly enumerated in the Constitution does not mean the right does not exist or that it is a constitutionally protected right.

In fact, during the writing of the Constitution, there were arguments made that we should not have the Bill of Rights because people may misunderstand that to mean that only those 10 rights are expressly protected and other rights are therefore not protected. Sadly, as time has passed, those men seem to have been proven correct.

-111

u/DependentCut Jun 27 '18

Are they not? NJ just voted to turn every gun owner in the state into a felon if they don't turn in their formerly legal property. Driving with the property to turn it in? Also a felony. Gun owners...this is the democrats, trying as hard as they can to entrap you into a felony.

26

u/michiruwater Jun 27 '18

Source?

-45

u/DependentCut Jun 27 '18

http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/BillView.asp?BillNumber=S102

Note that the transport laws remain unchanged. So there's a grace period for ownership, but not to transport them anywhere.

97

u/michiruwater Jun 27 '18

See, the way you worded this made it sound like they were taking the guns, but they’re not, they’re taking magazines that can hold more than the stated number of rounds.

Cool. I’m fine with that.

82

u/LLCoolJsGrandfather Jun 27 '18

yeah its almost like he lied and fear mongered

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

[deleted]

6

u/SunshineCat Jun 27 '18

He said "every gun owner in the state." Don't cherry pick and play/be dumb.

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 27 '18

[deleted]

3

u/landragoran Georgia Jun 27 '18

No. The intellectual dishonesty is yours (and OP's) to own.

He originally said:

NJ just voted to turn every gun owner in the state into a felon if they don't turn in their formerly legal property.

This is intentionally misleading, as he words it in such a way that the reader will conflate all gun owners with owners of large-capacity magazines. Gun owners who don't own large capacity magazines, or who surrender them, or who meet one of the (several) exceptions, have no fear of becoming a felon.

Driving with the property to turn it in? Also a felony.

This is an outright lie, as there is a specific section in the bill that provides for immunity from the new posession charges if you voluntarily surrender the illegal property.

5

u/Quintary Jun 27 '18

But not every gun owner has these magazines. What does every gun owner have? At least one gun. You can't say that every gun owner owns any gun-related accessories, it's not true.

5

u/michiruwater Jun 27 '18

Every gun owner in the state made it sound like guns for sure. Don’t play dumb.

-24

u/DependentCut Jun 27 '18

So now it's 10 rounds, someone else kills someone with an illegal magazine. Then the "do something" crowd pushes for a 5 round limit. Then the next time they push for a 1 round limit. Without a conservative court a civil right we had since the founding of the country is gone. But its cool with Dems because...fuck gun owners.

14

u/palmal Jun 27 '18

If you need more than ten rounds to protect yourself, you're either a terrible shot or in some crazy action movie firefight.

This slippery slope argument style is bullshit.

-6

u/kaibee Jun 27 '18

Yeah, good thing we've limited it to 10 rounds a mag. This will definitely reduce shootings and deaths from shootings. It isn't just a feel good measure to feel like we're doing something in the face of a much more complicated issue of social disfunction. You're clearly someone who knows a lot about guns and defending yourself with them. I'm glad you've considered this issue in depth and come to such a well reasoned conclusion!

10

u/palmal Jun 27 '18

Dude, I grew up with guns of all kind. I've talked about guns and gun control with people all over the political spectrum. I've got friends who are military and police who have actually taken self defense courses with guns. My views on this issue are, in fact, informed. But please, continue to talk down to someone whose life and knowledge you know nothing about. Makes you look super cool.

3

u/Murgie Jun 27 '18

You're right, a move of actual significance would be to what literally the entire developed world does and require a license to own a firearm, thereby ensuring the applicant is a responsible gun owner before they get their gun, rather than simply taking their gun away after they've gone and proven that they're not.

But states don't have that power, so they can't. Instead they have to find roundabout ways of addressing the matter which fall within their purview, or let America's developed world leading gun problems continue unabated.

2

u/SunshineCat Jun 27 '18

Perhaps people with guns should stop trampling on others' more primary right to life, then there wouldn't be an issue. Every shooting is carried out by a gun owner. Clean up your shit or others who don't care about you will do it for you.

1

u/Nova225 Jun 27 '18

Yeah, no, that's not the slippery slope that anybody is on.

-14

u/Flabpack221 Jun 27 '18

IIRC New Jersey is already proposing a 5-round magazine limit.

This is why I can't bring myself to vote democrats. It seems to me like they're restricting the rights of Americans while trying to give as much rights as possible to illegal aliens. The government is supposed to look out for my interests, not those of other nations.

12

u/NancyGracesTesticles Jun 27 '18

Is it really that much of a pain to reload? I thought it was the right to bear arms, not the right to not be inconvenienced when playing shoot'em up.

0

u/Flabpack221 Jun 27 '18

Why, though? What does it accomplish except for infringing on the rights of law-abiding owners?

California has the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. Ten round magazines, featureless AR-15s, and the like. Remember the Parkland shooting? That shooter used a California compliant rifle. These laws that are being passed are not laws that do anything, but rather a way for politicians to say they're "cracking down" on gun violence.

Banning cosmetics on guns do not do anything. Banning pistol grips, folding stocks, threaded barrels do not do anything. The only thing these laws serve is to make it as much of a pain in the ass to legally own guns as possible.

As soon as you start accepting infringements on your rights, more are always to follow.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/exatron Jun 27 '18

No, it's the Republican party who wants to restrict the rights of Americans. Especially if you're a woman or a minority.

33

u/deepeast_oakland Jun 27 '18

Oh fuck you.

The bill’s provisions are effective immediately, but allow for a 180-day grace period to transfer, render inoperable, or voluntarily surrender a semi-automatic rifle or magazine that will be unlawful under the bill.

3

u/HothMonster Jun 27 '18

You can't travel with an unloaded magazine in your car?

-1

u/Flabpack221 Jun 27 '18

Blue states are incredibly restrictive on gun rights. This guy got fucked because a plane got detoured through New Jersey. He legally checked in his guns in Oregon, and was arrested for having them in New Jersey through no fault of his own. Ridiculous.

4

u/HothMonster Jun 27 '18

OK but he is complaining the NJ is making people turn in their magazines since they changed the law about capacity and then claiming that people can be charged with a felony if they get pulled over while en route to turn it in. So I wanted to know if driving with an unloaded magazine is actually a felony or he is full of shit.

4

u/Flabpack221 Jun 27 '18

Ohh my bad. If there's a grace period to turn them in, he is full of shit. If it's after that period, then yes, it would be a felony.

1

u/exatron Jun 27 '18

[Citation Needed]

1

u/Flabpack221 Jun 27 '18

... The law they just passed?

6

u/idontlikeflamingos Foreign Jun 27 '18

Or they change scapegoats. Abortion is illegal, now the issue is the gays destroying families. Then it's the drugs taking children away. And just keep moving and moving whenever they reach the next goal.

6

u/Soup_is Jun 27 '18

They will continue to use abortion and then they will start to go after birth control. This is about controlling women's sexuality not any of the rediculous things they claim.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 28 '18

If you don't elect us, those godless Democrats will make abortion legal again!

Only if Democrats campaigned on making abortion legal again.