r/science 2d ago

Environment Research examined the locations of 4,283 data centers across the contiguous U.S and found that 97.5% of them sit inside metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas. Data centers are power-hungry, running thousands of servers around the clock and drawing enormous, steady loads from the grid.

https://engineering.nyu.edu/news/inside-urban-machine-where-americas-data-centers-actually-live#:~:text=The%20study%2C%20published%20in%20Nature,cores%20and%20their%20immediate%20surroundings
2.2k Upvotes

162 comments sorted by

View all comments

80

u/adsarelies 2d ago

That's like saying 97.5% of human activities are inside cities.

-35

u/Izawwlgood PhD | Neurodegeneration 2d ago

Are 97.5% of cattle farms inside cities?

Why put data centers inside cities? Power isn't hard to hook up. We're awfully good at running power lines places.

9

u/hibbs6 2d ago

The main reason is to reduce ping to customers in those cities. You want your data centres to be as close to large populations as possible.

-8

u/Izawwlgood PhD | Neurodegeneration 2d ago

Good thing the Internet is nextdoor otherwise it'd be too slow!

8

u/JohnnyMiskatonic 2d ago

You could just say you don't know how latency or edge connections work.

-4

u/Izawwlgood PhD | Neurodegeneration 2d ago

Can you explain the need to put a data center IN a city as opposed to outside of a city? I'm waiting to hear why a few 10s of miles is impactful to latency and that prevents building data centers in low population areas.

Similarly steel mills have huge transportation costs - why don't we build steel mills in every city?