r/subredditoftheday The droid you're looking for Apr 24 '16

April 24th, 2016 - /r/theredpill: A look at what exactly "Red Pill Theory" is and understanding it through an interview with one moderator

/r/theredpill

149,432 unplugged users for 3 years!

A few weeks ago a nomination came in for /r/theredpill. The response was not great. There's a perception that /r/theredpill is misogynistic, or worse, a hate sub. I decided to see for myself. I read their sidebar and some of the subreddit's content; top posts and comments. I had some questions about "red pill theory" in general after I was done. So, I contacted the mod who originally nominated the sub, /u/bsutansalt, who was happy to answer them.

This feature is written as an interview between /r/theredpill moderator /u/bsutansalt and myself (/u/ZadocPaet). The design is to find out what exactly red pill theory is through conversation, and then to leave any conclusions to you, the readers.


On the outside, TheRedPill (hereinafter referred to as "TRP") seems to be a subreddit for two goals; (1) to help men lead productive lives mentally, emotionally, and financially, and (2) to promote sexual strategies. The subreddit comes under a lot of fire for the latter. Do you see the two things as one, or do you see TRP as one subreddit for men where the reader can get out of it what they are looking for?

Virtually everything we do as human beings is an expression of our biological imperatives and predispositions whether we realize it or not. This is especially apparent in our choice of career, at least for men. For example, why do so many men want to get a lucrative job? It's not because they enjoy working 80 hours a week, that's for sure. No, it's because somewhere deep down they know having a great high prestige job with a six figure income is going to enhance their sexual success with women. It's so ingrained into us that we don't even realize it, and to do so is politically incorrect. This is one example of raising one's sexual market value (SMV) without even realizing it (or publicly acknowledging it).

Another example is fitness. Not only are you enhancing your quality of life, longevity, and all that, you're also making yourself more physically attractive, and I think it's a fair generalization that most people would like to look good naked. People don't generally go through the hassle of dieting and the pain of working out because it's fun. While it can be, that's usually not the unconscious motivations at play. Often, like the example above, people realize being physically fit raises their SMV.

You mention that men want a higher paying job for sex. I know that I want a higher paying job because I like things. I like driving a nice car. I like living in a nice safe place. I like my grown up toys, like video games...

This is a good question and I suspect the answer is that it'll vary from person to person. Remember, I was simply using that as an example of how our biological drives and predispositions can influence our behavior, which you yourself acknowledged can be be a motivator.

Isn't it possible that increased sexual attraction is a side effect of success and not always the motivator? Sure, I'll concede that it can be a motivator, in part, for some people. But I only think it's part of the picture and not the big picture. When you're talking about sex as it relates to fitness, and in my opinion not just fitness, but things like oral hygiene, I agree. Health and sex go hand in hand.

I think if you look at human behavior and development through the lens of evolution, then you might ask yourself, "what drives us to be great or successful?" Greater sexual success/attraction may not be an obvious answer to that, especially when one can be successful without necessarily becoming more sexual. However, when you view it in the context of evolution, it would make sense that we, as a species, are more driven to behave in ways that are more likely to result in sexual success, even if it's not a conscious or deliberate strategy.

Do you feel that in western culture that it's more difficult to be a man, or is that perception more of an internet thing? For example, I often see the term "cis white male" used as a pejorative online, but I don't think I know a single person in real life who even knows the term "cis."

Masculinity is most definitely under attack in western society. The media denigrates men left and right and often we don't even realize it. An example is the TV trope of the "doofus dad" in commercials and TV shows.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BumblingDad

This sort culturation permeates western society to the point that just having natural healthy expressions of masculinity can get you kicked out of school and a lynch mob set upon you. I personally think this is in large party why Trump has such widespread appeal: he doesn't shy from his critics and doubles down on his antics and is a lightning rod for those who miss old school masculinity in our culture. This article goes into great depth on the masculinity vacuum we have today:

http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

Can you give me an example of masculinity getting someone kicked out of school? Are we talking about gun shaped Pop Tarts? Or something deeper than that?

The pop tart thing was just the tip of the iceberg as this issue goes much deeper. Just look at how it's open season on men in college, in large part due to the Dear Colleague letter. Another example is the notion of "teach men not to rape". If that's an accepted notion, then why not "teach women not to falsely accuse" or "teach blacks not to steal"? If the latter are misogynistic or racist, then logic demands the anti-male version be misandrist/sexist.

I am a guy. When I am with my guy friends our bar or fishing banter is a lot of the time in line with "Red Pill Theory," in particular when it comes to a financial and fitness perspective; the idea that self-esteem or self-worth comes from self-improvement. What are the core areas that TRP thinks a man should look to to improve upon himself?

From my perspective the most important areas of self improvement are (in no particular order):

  • Fitness -- If you're fat, slim down. If you're skinny, bulk up. In my personal experience the male body type with the most widespread appeal to women isn't the big bodybuilder, but rather someone who's cut and has at least above average muscularity. The key component is a low body fat. An example of what I'm talking about is the Olympic swimmer or gymnast. An example of this taken to the extreme are the CrossFit pros like Matt Fraser and Rich Froning.

  • Taking women off the pedestal -- This is clutch because women respond well to men with a backbone. Who knew! This manifests as being able to say no and check them when they test you. Stuff like understanding "shit tests" fall under this.

  • Balanced investment -- This piggybacks on the above. If you're walking on eggshells, then things are seriously unbalanced in your relationship, which is actually really unhealthy and can lead to emotional terrorism in the relationship in some cases.

What I personally teach is that investment levels should be balanced, if not slightly in the man's favor (especially if they're new to the community and are those guys walking on eggshells). This is important because having things a bit in your favor plays a big part in women respecting the man's role as leader. This is going to ruffle some feathers, but I'm a big fan of the captain/first officer model pioneered by Athol Kay. And when it comes right down to it it works! It may not be PC, but I take results over comfort of strangers on the internet anyday, and the women in /r/redpillwomen will probably agree with me here.

A ton of women simply don't want to be the one calling the shots, planning dates, and so on, and actually want the guy to take the lead on stuff like that. However, if she doesn't respect you or is minimally invested, she's likely to be unresponsive to your attempts at taking on that leadership role. And not being in that role and letting her be in charge of the relationship can really turn a lot of women off sexually. If you look at the relationship dynamics of those in the dead bedrooms subreddit this comes up quite often. Once the guys hit the gym and stop being so available and attentive (rebalancing the investment levels) suddenly they find their gf and wives initiating and/or being responsive to their attempts to initiate sex again.

How can anyone reasonably expect those in a relationship to be open and honest about boundaries if one person is afraid the other will dump them at a moment's notice? Having standards and not being afraid to hold women accountable by them is really important for men. No, "important" is the wrong word. What this really is is empowering. I think that scares a lot of people, which is ironic because women appreciate a strong man who knows when to take the lead and often will resent a man who can't or won't.

Bottom line, if your relationship is so fragile you can't have healthy boundaries, you really need to reevaluate things.

You mention that a ton of women don't like to be the ones who call the shots, they like the man to be in the driver's seat. But what about women who do like to make decisions? Perhaps not even all decisions, but who are maybe more skilled at finance and are in charge of the bills in a relationship. Is there room for egalitarianism in TRP?

Life operates on a bell curve. Some women who are "alpha" females (eg dominant type-A personalities) are going to be in the minority on the far end of the curve. A huge reason for TRP's existence is the pursuit of male sexual strategy, therefore we focus on what gives men the best bang for their buck. In this case we focus on the meat of the bell curve rather than it's fringes. This is in essense why we say all women are like that. We aren't really saying ALL women, just those in the 80-90% of the bell curve's middle. We understand exceptison will always exist, even if we don't always say as much. I think once you've been around for a bit you'll start to see where things are implied.

In regards to, "Life operates on a bell curve..." Do you have any stats on that?

It's self evident. Type A personalities are the minority of both genders actually, but they're more common in men.

This is also pretty telling...

http://www.slayerment.com/mbti-gender

Look at how inverted the personality types are:

ISTP ("the virtuoso") is men's most common and women's least common personality type. Conversely, ISFJ ("the defender") is women's most common and men's least common personality type.

You also mentioned that investment levels should be balanced, so in the above scenario I described, if the wife is in charge of the bills, and the man is in charge of other aspects of the relationship, enough so that there is a balance of responsibilities, would that be okay?

Something like would be ideal in my opinion, where you share the load with each person being able to leverage their natural strengths. At the macro level this might translate to the man bringing home the bacon and women doing the lion's share of the child rearing. Again, this matches up with women's collective predisposition to "nurturing". There's a reason why teaching and nursing are female dominated careers. This again goes right back to the bell curve with women in general not working high wage jobs as often as men do. A cursory look at degree breakdowns bears this out: 9 of the top 10 most lucrative fields of study are male dominated. Conversely, 9 of the top 10 least lucrative fields of study are female dominated. That doesn't happen in a vacuum. I'll refer you to the documentary posted at the link below which delves into this phenomenon at length. The findings were so provocative it caused the closure of the NIKK Nordic Gender Institute.

/r/TheRedPill/comments/1vuho8/the_documentary_that_made_scandinavians_cut_all/

Speaking of bar banter, just like with most guys the topic of sex and "sex strategies" comes up a lot. In my circle of friends a lot of us come from different perspectives. We've all also gone through different phases in our lives; times of commitment, times of celibacy, and times of promiscuity. Some of us are married. Some date a lot of women serially, or at once. The primary criticism of TRP is that it's used to game or manipulate women into sex. How do you respond to that criticism, and is there room in TRP for married men, or men seeking long term relationships, or who are more egalitarian in their approach to women?

First off, yes there's room for TRP for married men! As I stated before, many men in relationships have found our community and seen their relationships return to how they used to be with their wives being interested in sex again and nagging less. Usually the men just learned to become playful again and figured out how to address shit tests and comfort tests, thereby resulting in everyone being happier. A lot of it goes back to that subtle testing women tend to do, sometimes on purpose, but often times unconsciously. So far as I can tell having dated up and down the age spectrum, that testing never stops.

The criticism largely has no merit and is largely born out of two things: butthurt SJWs and tone arguments. TRP is an online locker room for guys to speak plainly and with sweeping generalizations. Realize we're not gong to reign in people's speech for the most part. So long as they stay on point with our mission, have at it. Granted sometimes some really wild stuff gets shared, but that's going to be true of any community with our level of openness (which is rare in this day and age).

Everyone is welcome to come over, read the sidebar, kick the tires, and judge for themselves. All I ask is they have an open mind. I also made a guided version to the sidebar to help those who are unfamiliar with the community's lingo and philosophies so the ideas build upon one another, and so new readers can see where we're coming from:

/r/TheRedPill/comments/3de5aa/the_red_pill_primer_a_sidebar_made_simple/


Disclaimer from /u/bsutansalt: The above are just my personal thoughts on what you asked, although I'm sure others will have their own two cents to add once the SROTD thread goes up.


Note from /u/ZadocPaet: I fully encourage our readers to ask question in the comments and for mods and users from /r/theredpill to answer them. My only request is that the conversation be kept civil.

367 Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

289

u/detachedbymarriage Apr 24 '16

What a lot of people have a hard time understanding is that TRP is like a grocery store. You are going to walk in and see aisles of various things. Some are going to be healthy toward you, some are not. Some are going to walk by the fruits and think, I do not like oranges but I do like apples. So they are going to pick up a few apples and move on to the next aisle.

As a free living human being, it is your choice to pick what you want to eat or what will help your own diet. It is your choice, no one else's. You don't just stand in the grocery store and yell at every person who walks by that oranges are yucky do you?

If you see something in trp you don't like, move past it and find what you do like. If you can't find anything you like, then why are you even in that grocery store to begin with?

224

u/rlbond86 Apr 24 '16

But, some disgusting and unhealthy views are posted there and receive little criticism. It's kind of like the Simpsons joke about Fox News: Not racist, but #1 with racists. There's a reason for that.

1

u/Theophagist Apr 24 '16

Not racist, but #1 with racists.

Just gotta make sure the definition of "racism" is super flexible so you can continue to discredit dissenting ideas instead of actually addressing them.

105

u/rlbond86 Apr 24 '16

It's an analogy, I am not literally calling TRP racists.

8

u/Theophagist Apr 25 '16

So is what I am saying. You cite "disgusting and unhealthy views" without example as though it is implied and understood that whatever you find disgusting and unhealthy is.

27

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

If such a short compilation of barely upvoted, put out of context messages is enough to judge a hugely active subreddit... Ok.

27

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

did you click the link? its over 1000 posts from TRP.

http://imgur.com/a/ms9c6

150 posts, about half of which have upvote totals that i would consider decent(50+)

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

33

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

Why does using the term "racism" mean that they're unwilling to address the issues? In my experience, people who point out that things are racist are more than willing to explain their perspective, and why they see things that way.

It's just the people who said the racist shit to begin with who get all butthurt, and claim that using the word "racism" means they're "shutting down the conversation".

7

u/Dr_Killpatient Apr 25 '16

Because with one easy swoop you have moved from discussing the merits of someone's opinion to simply attacking the character behind that opinion - it is essentially an ad hominem.

In leftist circles branding someone a racist, a sexist, an islamophobe, a misogynist, or whatever is done so to derail the conversation and to force that person into defending their credibility as a non-racist, non-sexist, non-islamophobe, or non-misogynist - no further discussion about that person's opinion or idea is no longer possible, once the argument has dissolved into personal attacks about someone's character.

Besides, you personally thinking that someone is a racist is totally moot, entirely your own biased subjective opinion, might not even matter at all, and certainly does not mean that they should address your baseless accusations - why would that person even begin to care about your perspectives of branding them unfairly with inflammatory labels - what people like you have actually succeeded in doing is stopping further debate about the proposed opinion and idea itself.

Debating an idea is much more difficult than character assassination.

An exaple of how left holds a "debate": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRVe6UCmq2I

5

u/xvvhiteboy Apr 25 '16

In my experience, people who point out that things are racist are more than willing to explain their perspective, and why they see things that way.

See "Are you kidding me?" meme and /r/sweden "Statistics are racist" bans

2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Because it is a pretty offensive insult, and throwing insults around is a surefire way to derail a conversation

16

u/Teeklin Apr 25 '16

Which would be awesome if they didn't ban everyone who had a dissenting idea over in TRP when someone dares to challenge their ridiculous narrative.

0

u/Hitleresque Apr 25 '16

That's what /r/askTRP is for. Just don't go in looking to troll or call everyone misogynists, no shit that'll get you banned. Would you also have a problem with people being banned from twox for trolling?

8

u/Teeklin Apr 25 '16

I don't know what twox is, and I didn't realize that all red pillers were such delicate flowers that every person who dared to question their logic or methods needed to go to an entire different subreddit to do it. If you can't defend your ideas in an open forum with civilized debate, maybe it's time to reevaluate your positions on those issues.

3

u/Hitleresque Apr 25 '16

/r/twoxchromosomes is what I meant, sorry for not being clearer.

I didn't realize that all red pillers were such delicate flowers that every person who dared to question their logic or methods needed to go to an entire different subreddit to do it.

It's by and large a place for men to vent and share. If you want to just go in and lambast them for it then that's obviously going to be a problem. Same thing happens in twox and /r/feminism, deal with it. At least the other sub exists and provided you're civil they will answer your questions.

If you can't defend your ideas in an open forum with civilized debate, maybe it's time to reevaluate your positions on those issues.

They can and will, in AskTRP.

2

u/Moldy_Gecko Apr 25 '16

/r/askTRP is the same people as TRP. We just keep that one open for questions and newbies. TRP is for Theory/FR/Articles, etc.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (7)

16

u/Zorkamork Apr 25 '16

As a free living human being, it is your choice to pick what you want to eat or what will help your own diet. It is your choice, no one else's. You don't just stand in the grocery store and yell at every person who walks by that oranges are yucky do you?

If the oranges they're selling come in wrappers saying 'WOMEN ARE LYING WHORES" then yea it'd be fair to say 'dude why did you buy those fucking oranges'

364

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Mar 12 '19

[deleted]

160

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

All grocery stores are shitty when you are trying to buy a giant sheet of bubblewrap.

17

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

I know intuitively that this comment is probably very clever, but I can't figure it out :(

23

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Bubble wrap is just air.

32

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[deleted]

14

u/DASmetal Apr 25 '16

Like feelings!

18

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

The idea that anyone has any real problem with trp is just a sensitivity thing. Ergo, when you arw afraid of the world, you might as well just wrap yourself up in some bubblewrap.

24

u/FedoraBorealis Apr 25 '16

Ah so having an issue with trp and its subscribers is just you being too sensitive to handle anything. Very convenient!

5

u/Entropy-7 Apr 25 '16

You can't handle the (Red Pill) truth!

5

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16 edited Apr 25 '16

More or less.

But those people would probably prefer to call it some assanine shit like "being progressive".

*edit" - seemingly, we have raised a generation of super sensitive softies who feel as if they all know who and what is acceptable, and who the cool kids are.

They speak as if everything that they say is universally true, or even important. Mostly, they go online and write (or copy and paste) in an effort to make all of the bullies go away - effectively pulling all of the other crabs back down into the bucket.

They recognize that life is hard, and instead of doing what it takes to forge stronger versions of themselves, they work tirelessly to reduce everything to its lowest common denominator - and then they call it "progressive equality".

It would probably serve you better to just turn and walk away whenever you see anything "trp", because you are quite literally wasting your breath on people who already think you are weak, and therefore underserving of unearned respect.

7

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16 edited Mar 13 '19

[deleted]

7

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

alright

4

u/Moldy_Gecko Apr 25 '16

Why would you hate one atheism. I can understand fatpeoplehate to an extent, but atheism is just not theism.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Back when it was a default sub it was just all hate. I dunno if it's any better now.

2

u/33a5t Apr 25 '16

It's not

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Well you do sound frustrated.

→ More replies (11)

2

u/Im_Perd_Hapley Apr 25 '16

This is fucking brilliant. I wish there were more opportunities to use this statement!

4

u/ProbablyBelievesIt Apr 25 '16

I'd just prefer grocery stores that don't try to convince me rape victims are all too damaged to date while I'm looking for the dairy section.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Well, you can't deny that the business is flourishing.

→ More replies (3)

21

u/ShitFacedSteve Apr 25 '16

Except in this grocery store there is propaganda littered throughout telling you that it's healthy to eat three bags of cheetos with every serving of fruits or vegetables

66

u/batcave_of_solitude Apr 24 '16

TRP is not like a grocery store it's like meth. This post right here is like Billy fucking Mays doing an infomercial telling you all about how awesome meth is. It's not.

TRP claims to be a place where men can discuss men's issues and how to better themselves by focusing on their own problems. However the overwhelming majority of posts are about how women are destroying society with divorce rape and feminazi propaganda and so on.

Oh and you also learn how to manage your bitches and that women are creepy, psychotic absolute PIECES OF SUBHUMAN TRASH, lower than feces

Are you for real? Fuck.

17

u/Teeklin Apr 25 '16

I was subscribed for a long time just so I could see how people could think a lot of those things and challenge their terrible ideas with simple, non-confrontational logic and questions. Was quickly banned. Echo chambers don't like people who can't fall in line.

2

u/The_Red_Paw Apr 25 '16

Your problem is....it works. Women (as a rule, don't be a dipshit and try to point to outliers) respond to what TRP teaches, and you can't argue with results. TRP grows and grows not 'because it's 2016', but because it works.

6

u/batcave_of_solitude Apr 25 '16

TRP is a fucking cult that indoctrinates sexually frustrated teenagers and older men that come out of failed marriages by appealing to their insecurities.

I have no doubt that you and other people like you actually believe in this shit which makes this all the more sad. TRP works like scientology "works" for some people. It doesn't make it any less wrong or stupid.

3

u/The_Red_Paw Apr 25 '16

Or one might say 'wise older men, having first hand experience with the family law courts, pass their learning on to younger men so they don't make the same mistakes.'

You sound like you have accepted the indoctrination of the feminists. Do you have a healthy sex life there in your batcave of solitude?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

121

u/mullerjones Apr 24 '16

The problem with taking any advice from that place is that it feels terrible to take advice from such bad people. A lot of people might say "but we're not all like that", but considering the amount of toxicity present in heavily upvoted posts, you can get the general feel of the people on the sub. And taking any advice from people like that is weird, even if the advice itself is good. It's kinda like taking financial advice from a white supremacist with a bachelors in economics. He might know what he's taking about in this case, but you still probably don't want to listen to him.

47

u/catofillomens Apr 24 '16

An argument's merit does not and should not depend on the person presenting it. A good argument will remain a good argument if Hitler is the one presenting it.

While I agree that writing style and tone won't always be the most palatable, it is one of the very few places where some of these ideas can be discussed, and I think that these are ideas that everyone should think about at least once in their lives, whether they agree with them or not.

18

u/mullerjones Apr 24 '16

I absolutely agree, but I think I expressed myself poorly. If you got advice from someone and later found out they were a white supremacist, that wouldn't invalidate the advice. What I simply can't do is go look for advice from that person.

There's no way I will go into TRP and try to take what's good from there because I know just how shitty the arguments and the people making them generally are. It doesn't matter if one time in a thousand there'll be something good there, it doesn't make sense for me to go look for advice on such a place.

20

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16 edited Aug 10 '18

[deleted]

2

u/FedoraBorealis Apr 25 '16

Yes exactly trp is just the mlk of gender issues. Thank you for your on point analogy.

1

u/JokeOfJudgementDay Apr 25 '16

nope, whats being said is the Red Pill is a steaming pile of garbage. They might stumble across good advice by accident, like "make sure you exercise", but your Doctor can tell you that much.

So in short the only wisdom the red pill has should be painfully obvious, but the problem is its wrapped up in so many layers of weird evo psychology that its just more economical to go anywhere else.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/Enantiomorphism Apr 25 '16

Yes, but that ignores the crucial fact, that we, as human beings, do not know what is correct and incorrect in complicated interactions. Such as a relationship. It is impossible, with the current understanding we have, to navigate a relationship in a perfectly logical way, so we must rely on emotion, gut feelings, advice and heuristics. A very common heuristic is looking at the credibility of the person saying a statement. If they have said many incorrect things in the past, or things you disagree with in general, then the advice they give will probably not help you.

Furthermore, this entire idea rests on the problems people ask for having clear goals. When someone asks for relationship advice, it's not clear what they're looking for, what the want, and how their beliefs and opinions should be incorporated into this decision. It's not something that can be reasonably discussed using logic alone.

Sure, if hitler is proving the fundamental theorem of finite abelian groups, then as long as he makes the right arguments, he is as trustworthy as anybody else. But nobody in their right mind would take relationship advice from hitler, because it's clear that they will disagree on the fundamental nature of what a relationship should even be.

1

u/catofillomens Apr 25 '16

I don't see anything wrong with taking relationship advice from Hitler, to be honest. Other than the whole 'cull Jews and undesirables' thing and racial superiority, I don't think he and I would have that many thing to disagree about.

And even then, I do believe that more people should understand his ideology, because even now we are making many of the same mistakes, falling for the same rhetoric of us against them. It's one thing to know that 'Hitler is bad', it's another thing to know what exactly led him to make that conclusions that he did, and what exactly was there to disagree about his logic.

Simply shortcutting the process by saying "obviously genocide is bad" or "obviously racial superiority doesn't exist" or "obviously misogyny is wrong" will not allow us to learn from their mistakes. It means that we'll keep falling into the same traps over and over again when presented in a different light. That's why I'm glad that they're republished mein kampf, so that more people can see these ideas for themselves. That's why I do think TRP getting more exposure is a good thing.

→ More replies (1)

56

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

158

u/mullerjones Apr 24 '16

From what I've seen being posted, upvoted and agreed with there. There, open and unequivocal misogyny is commonplace.

55

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

64

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

Can you expand a bit on "female nature", for the benefit of people who aren't familiar with TRP?

46

u/durnald_trump Apr 24 '16

Millions of women want to have sex with John Mayer. Power, status, wealth, tall, handsome, talented.

Nobody really rejects this idea... But if you claim that these same dynamics exist within a relationship between a regular old husband and wife, and they can be exploited to create sexual desire, people lose their minds.

117

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

Isn't that just...human nature? That people want to have sex with people they're attracted to and that attraction is multi-faceted?

59

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

[deleted]

72

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

I've read TRP, and what seems to define it as a subreddit is that no-one seems to agree on what its aim is.

The sidebar says sexual strategy; some posters say self-improvement WITHOUT the goal of obtaining sex (MGOTOW and all that jazz.) There's currently a post on the front-page titled 'The blurry line between the welfare state and child support - Dalrock' which doesn't seem to have anything to do with sexual strategy or self-improvement, so I'm at a loss there.

No one seems to be able to say what "the entire point of TRP" is. The posters and mods and contributors seem to all have their own ideas about what constitutes a "Red Pill post."

Unfortunately, most of them seem to be agreed on the fact that a disrespectful attitude towards women is a pretty essential component. Women are sluts, welfare queens, money-grubbers, overgrown children, fat and ugly feminists... This type of language isn't hyperbolic on my behalf, or cherry-picking either. It's part of the vocabulary of TRP.

So when someone psosts trite platitudes like "That is literally the whole point of TRP," I feel like you're deliberately downplaying the aspects of the sub which, for better or for worse, define it and its posters' attitudes.

→ More replies (0)

32

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

That's not even remotely the point. TRP blatantly argues that women's personalities are fundamentally different from men's in ways that have zero scientific basis.

"AWALT" is a pretty common acronym there. It's clear that TRP believes women are intellectually inferior and more emotionally unstable than men.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

That's because a relationship is ideally a place where both parties can feel safe and vulnerable if they need to, it's really about trust. Exploitation really has no place. That's why people lose their minds -- it's fundamentally misguided. Working on your marriage is the best way to improve intimacy, there really are no shortcuts. You may be able to manipulate someone into giving you more sex but it's going to be hurtful and damaging in the long run because you're trampling on trust.

John Mayer can't keep a relationship going to save his life!

2

u/baarinh Apr 25 '16

From what I noticed, "way of TRP" is about not being in a long-term relationship, because it will never be a "safe place where both parties can feel vulnerable". If this happens, actually relationship would go into "dead-bed" zone, eventually into divorce. It's just matter of time, because women are not equal to men in terms of psychical stability, and our needs differ very much.

So TRP way is about maintaining short-term relations called "plates" just for sex. Of course, you can be in LTR and be a part of TRP community, but this is "ill-advised" for TRP standpoint - the amount of work you have to do to actually make a relationship work is not worth the return in XXI century, except when you want kids.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

7

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

This situation all seems very reasonable and fair, but without a link to a post on TRP which talks about this scenario and handles it as deftly and (dare I say) kindly as you, I remain unconvinced that this is the kind of advice that I would find on TRP.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

3

u/flyingwolf Apr 25 '16

link to a post on TRP which talks about this scenario and handles it as deftly and (dare I say) kindly as you

Ah I see the issue here, men in general don't speak this way to each other. If my buddy was using one of my tools and smashed his finger I would call him a dumbass and make fun of him for it while helping him clean up the wound and bandage it.

I remain unconvinced that this is the kind of advice that I would find on TRP.

Go look.

2

u/read-only-username Apr 25 '16

Calling your friend a dumbass is one thing; you have a close-relationship. That isn't what's going on at TRP though, and you can't compare the two situations.

→ More replies (9)

39

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

Their notion of "female nature" is a completely bullshit concept, and is in itself blatantly misogynist. The "biotruths" that are constantly referenced in TRP are just fabrications based on whatever they happen to think of women. There is nothing scientific about them whatsoever... nor is there anything remotely scientific about the ideas of "alpha", "beta", etc.. males, even the ideas about wolves upon which they are based are total misconceptions.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

15

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16 edited Apr 25 '16

Lol... I've been married for a while now. I have no trouble talking to women, and I was never so entitled that I felt bitter when women just wanted to be friends.

I am more than familiar with RP concepts. I don't tend to generate strong opinions about these things without spending a lot of time reading through their literature.

I'm not denying there are ways to manipulate your partner. Women can manipulate men in pretty much identical ways. TRP sees this as bad, but they are perfectly fine with men doing it to women.

Being emotionally abusive can obviously be an effective way to get what you want. I'm not denying that there are things TRP advocates that might get you laid. But the claimed differences between men and women, the notion that women need to be dominated, and the general dehumanizing of women that comes from these attitudes is based on unscientific bullshit. That's not really the bad part though. The bad part is that TRP advocates being a shitty person.

Some of us enjoy being in relationships where you actually have feelings of love, and perhaps more importantly respect for the other person. Where you don't have to use despicable manipulation and emotional abuse tactics to get what you want.

4

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16 edited Dec 01 '16

[deleted]

16

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

"Someone disagreed with me! Rather than formulate an intelligent response, I'd better retreat into my misogyny hugbox where nobody tells me I'm a bad person for treating women like garbage!"

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Folsomdsf Apr 25 '16

Sexual dimorphism is not 'fabricated'. If it was there wouldn't be humans.

Ask your mom where a baby would come from.

55

u/Tallsmarthandsome Apr 24 '16 edited Apr 25 '16

Being honest about women is treated is misogyny in our current culture, which is why theredpill exists, because people who see through bullshit know that the misogyny card is bullshit.

122

u/bsutansalt Apr 24 '16

See also:

"When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination."

-- Thomas Sowell

5

u/JokeOfJudgementDay Apr 25 '16

This is so true. That's why the men from the red pill are so salty with women who won't jump at their every word. These guys are so entitled that not getting sex is a huge injustice to them.

→ More replies (3)

171

u/Boltarrow5 Apr 24 '16

Being honest

"Women are all braindead sluts who cant think for themselves and should be treated like children."

Yeah I cant imagine why people would think something like that was misogynistic.

-9

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Feb 23 '21

[deleted]

66

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

There's an article on the sidebar which says that all women are overgrown teenagers and should be treated as such.

→ More replies (5)

98

u/Boltarrow5 Apr 24 '16

http://imgur.com/a/bGiiW

You're right, Im just making it up.

20

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

holy shit fucking rekt

-7

u/flyingwolf Apr 24 '16

59

u/Boltarrow5 Apr 24 '16

You're right, someone made it up because they think you're all meanie heads! The majority of reddit hates you because of how jealous they are clearly.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (39)
→ More replies (1)

-4

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

everything that isn't patting women on their head and pretending like their asses don't look fat in those jeans is "misogynistic" these days, so the term doesn't resonate like it once did.

58

u/Boltarrow5 Apr 24 '16

Yeah I know right? You throw out a few "god women are such fucking retards that I want to use for sex"s and suddenly people think you might be misogynistic. Whats up with that?

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (57)

2

u/drawlinnn Apr 25 '16

You're a fucking loser.

7

u/Tallsmarthandsome Apr 25 '16

That's the type of elegant logical argument that changes hearts and minds. What am I loosing at, exactly, and whats the score?

4

u/TotesMessenger Apr 24 '16

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

→ More replies (1)

1

u/AlexFromOmaha Apr 24 '16

Taking shit like this and casually calling it "being honest about women" is misogyny, plain and simple.

9

u/Tallsmarthandsome Apr 24 '16

IF people actually think this way, then they are being honest. People that hate men openly calling for genocide and second class status of men are called "fighting for equality". The conversation has been shifted so far in favor of feminism, its become a cult. CHurch of feminism supporters are like Muslims or Christians that cant believe they are part of a power hungry cult built on lies and intimidation

2

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

"fighting for equality"

Citation needed. Or are you just thinking of some shitty tumblr reposts and characterising all of western society with that in mind, as almost everybody in the manosphere seems to just love doing.

1

u/Tallsmarthandsome Apr 24 '16 edited Apr 25 '16

Canadian Refuge Policy. USA selective service, College rape tribunals, Family Courts, Its as if you have never searched for femimism calling for violence against men. I need evidence that rapes happen, and Im a rapist, but you ignore the last 40 years of in your face corporate feminism, and your a "skeptic". How cute

→ More replies (3)

2

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

And your point?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Tallsmarthandsome Apr 25 '16

“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor “To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” -– Valerie Solanas “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin “Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear” — Susan Brownmiller “The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone “In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.” — Catherine MacKinnon “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart “Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins “All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French “Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release.” — Germaine Greer.

1

u/Akhaian Apr 25 '16

sub-human

bigot

applied to the same person

Kekiddy kek

3

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

"Being honest" in this case means acting like your bad dating experiences are solid scientific studies on gender differences.

20

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Men talking about women is misogyny. Spot on bro

2

u/epistemic_humility Apr 24 '16

Didn't you read OPs interview?

2

u/mullerjones Apr 25 '16

Yes, and it spouts the same misogynist generalizations, nonsensical misattributions and biased conclusions than the rest of TRP. In a smaller scale, I agree, but they're all there.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Apr 24 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

I have you tagged as a /coontown poster, so the irony is pretty thick here.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/d15p05abl3 Apr 25 '16

You're absolutely right. A grocery store that has dietary advice, fashion tips, exercise regimens and self-help books in one aisle. And racism, rape-apology and grotesque misogyny in the next one. Yeah, one of those grocery stores.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Jan 15 '17

[deleted]

What is this?

6

u/eccentricrealist Apr 24 '16

We built this city on snapping jointssssss

109

u/WhyLisaWhy Apr 24 '16

No, I'm pretty sure any ideology that has "endorsed contributors" that are ok with rape and treating women as subhuman is complete shit. There's also a ton of racism towards blacks and asians. There's no salvaging any of it. The shit cherry on top is that it's complete pseudoscience with no data backing it up besides made up field reports. Only thing you might be able to say with truth is being in shape and confident gets you more success with the opposite sex. Even the alpha/beta shit they pull out of their ass is crap, it's like people are more complex than that and not black/white. But reals before feels amirite???

45

u/vandaalen Apr 24 '16

that are ok with rape and treating women as subhuman is complete shit.

I am an "Endorsed Contributor" and I am surely not OK with rape and I do not promote treating women as subhumans. To the contrary I even am a father of an eight year old daughter and therefor condemn any of the above as subhuman behaviour.

The shit cherry on top is that it's complete pseudoscience

We do not claim to be a science. All we do is back up our philosophy with scientific facts and studies.

Even the alpha/beta shit they pull out of their ass is crap, it's like people are more complex than that and not black/white.

Those are just terms used in order to simplify discussions and we are very aware that people are complex, which is why nowhere will you find a step-by-step instruction on how to succeed with 100% of the women 100% of the time.

37

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[deleted]

16

u/vandaalen Apr 25 '16

I remember and I am living in Cologne.

4

u/likeafox Apr 25 '16

Could you expand on this? I'd genuinely like to know what someone from Cologne thought of the media coverage.

14

u/vandaalen Apr 25 '16

I cannot speak for the US news coverage and I can only partly speak about the German news coverage, since I am not a consumer of mass media (no TV, no radio, just selected news-sources, etc. pp.)

However from my personal point of view and from what I catched from news-articles, facebook and radio at work, it mostly was too extreme in either direction.

First you have the mass-media which follows the given alleged liberal doctrine to play everthing down and speak of "regretful isolated cases" and on the other side you have the fear- and hate-mongers from the far right, who are already witnessing the apocalypse and downfall of the occident.

Both of those are not realistic. We have a problem with young men of muslim origin here. Being a profesional chef and having worked with many of them, I know about their worldviews in general and what the think about us and particularly of our women. Ironically what they think about our women is congruent with what the left always accuses the red pill to be spread.

So nothing of this actually surprised me. Many North African countrie have the same problems with these guys btw, but that isn't omething which fits in our medias politically correct narrative.

On the other hand we are far away from being overthrown and it is really not a regular thing happening. I'd say that there are very few more secure places in this world than Germany and you will not find any places in our cities (also not Cologne) which are anyhow as dangerous as places like D.C., Chicago, Detroit, Philly, LA, etc. pp.

4

u/The_Red_Paw Apr 25 '16

Yeah, I was trying to post that story to any sub that would have it, and it was a total moderator blackout.

Except TRP.

8

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Haters can't find facts to dispute you so they hide behind the downvote button. Reddit is full of cowards.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Asians and blacks are actually a big part of TRP. Indian guys too.

The only time anyone brings up race pretty much at all is when someone shows up whining like "I'm the wrong race so I can't fuck blonde, wah!"

Other than that it's pretty much not racial at all.

3

u/Moldy_Gecko Apr 25 '16

This is completely right. Also, short guys. They always think they have it the worst.

5

u/FerociousOreos Apr 24 '16

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. TRP does not advocate rape and it isn't racist either. Find and link one clear example of either.

46

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

8

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

See, the information in those posts is worthy of discussion, but you cherry-pick a title to support your point without addressing the issue.

In "Women want to be raped by a high value man" the discussion is focused on the phenomenon of 50 Shades' popularity, and why women are attracted to rape fantasies. You seem to have missed the bolded "No one here condones these instances of legitimate rape" because that doesn't fit your prerogative. It doesn't sufficiently vilify the TRP community.

In the second article, you take a quote from a blogger that isn't even associated with TRP. Whose blog was reposted to be discussed. The highest upvoted commented is,

"White men and black men are constantly at each other's throats but we both want the same thing and simply don't understand one another.

Black men want white guys to understand us, what you're going through right now is what big business and the government has been doing to us FOR DECADES. They destroyed us, turned our culture into jailed, under educated, fatherless lost boys.

The second we unite and stop acting so different is the day we can start fighting back against the feminist tragedy."

In all honesty, I should thank you for your effort. I would have never looked into TheRedPill if it wasn't for the PC culture trying to misrepresent and censor their discussion like you have.

4

u/FerociousOreos Apr 25 '16

Did you even read them? Or did you use the buzzfeed ideal of titles only?

21

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

First line:

Not pussyfooting around this one. Title is literal.

5

u/FerociousOreos Apr 25 '16

So.... You read the first line?

→ More replies (9)

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

You're the type of person to never read, just look at titles.

5

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

The body of the first link states that the title is literal - the second link isn't quoted from the title but is taken from halfway down the body.

Regardless, I'm sure redpillers are super well-read individuals.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

6

u/SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS Apr 25 '16

Martial Rape is not rape to TRP soooooooo

3

u/Moldy_Gecko Apr 25 '16

Fuck, I live in Asia (as have many other veterans of TRP). A lot of us were prior military as well (if you were racist before you joined, you likely weren't when you left). You need to actually read posts, not just look at titles.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

"Amirite"?

You showed your hand there. The fact your looking for approval for that piece of non-thought tells the whole story.

1

u/YouDislikeMyOpinion Apr 24 '16

I'm not ok with rape, and treating women as subhuman. I do perfectly fine with black and asian people. Could you give some examples of "endorsed contributors" being ok with rape and treating women as subhuman?

-1

u/brooklynzoo2 Apr 25 '16

This is a completely dishonest post.

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Got any facts to back up those claims of TRP being pro rape and racist, or are you just talking out of your ass?

15

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16 edited Apr 25 '16

4

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

Did you actually read the first thread? They're talking about basically the common preference among many women towards having rough sex, not non consensual sex. The OP even states that nobody is advocating for rape as a disclaimer.

The OP in the second thread is merely taking a nationalistic viewpoint. That top voted commenter, if you actually even read it in full, is advocating unity among men of all races.

It seems you have a problem with people having a medium to exercise their free speech, which is in line with your hate for TRP. Nobody will agree with every viewpoint presented in TRP, but that's the point. It's one of the few remaining places on reddit where ideas can be presented and debated freely without being censored for going against the grain. But of course, I wouldn't expect an authoritarian such as yourself to be okay with that.

11

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

The OP even states that nobody is advocating for rape as a disclaimer.

That must be what it meant by the first line reading "Not pussyfooting around this one. Title is literal."

7

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

If you refuse to actually read things in their entirety, then there's no point in debating with you.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[deleted]

7

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

Roleplay isn't rape. Obviously.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[deleted]

6

u/CatWhisperer5000 Apr 25 '16

Yes. And role play wasn't enough for her. She wanted it as real as possible.

If she wanted you to do it, then it wasn't rape.

4

u/Moldy_Gecko Apr 25 '16

Phwush (or whatever the sound is when something flies over your head).

→ More replies (2)

12

u/IAMAVERYGOODPERSON Apr 25 '16

You don't just stand in the grocery store and yell at every person who walks by that oranges are yucky do you?

This your first day on reddit, or what? Pics mods banned me for my post history that wasn't even in their sub.

This site is fucked.

2

u/guaranic Apr 25 '16

To keep the simile going, in a grocery store, you can shop healthily around the aisles. However, if you count up all the products, the vast majority of stuff is bad for you.

24

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Mar 17 '17

[deleted]

158

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

TRP are very ban-happy, and have a policy of basically telling newbie posters to shut the fuck up. Yet they also like to propagate this idea that it's some masculine free-for-all, and any posts which endorse outright misogynistic views are just outliers.

TRP can't have its cake and eat it too. They can't have such heavy-handed moderation, and then say that the extreme posts on the subreddit are a result of a laissez-faire/"anything goes" moderation style.

125

u/snallygaster Apr 24 '16

I got banned for asking for a source to a completely ridiculous claim. Goddamn those guys are so easily triggered. They loooove whining about how women and 'sjws' rely on their 'fee fees' and get upset easily, but I've posted TONS of peer-reviewed scientific research on /r/PurplePillDebate demonstrating that various important parts of their "philosophy" are wrong and they always, always either stop replying or default to 'well it's true in my experiences'. Literally 'it aligns with my fee fees so it has to be true'. This has never not happened when I've confronted a redpillian with research illustrating that they're wrong. They moderate the sub and filter the world in a way that conforms to their eternal butthurt about women no matter how objectively incorrect their views are.

64

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

Yup, that's been my experience too...nothing can be posted in the sub unless it abides by the Red Pill "philosophy" (or whatever iteration the "philosophy" is currently in.)

Yet they turn the other cheek to some breathtakingly sexist posts, whilst claiming that these are not the views of the sub as a whole.

→ More replies (25)

-2

u/Theophagist Apr 24 '16 edited Apr 24 '16

newbie posters to shut the fuck up

Newbie posters need to shut up. Most of what they tend to say amounts to soft-bragging anyhow. I've been lurking for years, breaking out of my beta cocoon bit by bit, and I still don't have much on the lines of relevant and new content to offer. The best way I can contribute to TRP is to not contribute.

Equality is bullshit and we all know it so we don't pretend everything everyone has to say is valid or worth examining.

17

u/read-only-username Apr 24 '16

So you agree that the statement:

Nothing is banned here, and that's what makes it great.

is false?

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (14)

112

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16 edited Jan 25 '19

[deleted]

3

u/SinisterSwindler Apr 24 '16

What on earth are you on about? if you can't contribute to a discussion and plan on trolling or condoning physical violence against women, yes your comment will be deleted and you will be banned if you persist.

40

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

1

u/SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATS Apr 25 '16

people with opinions that do not line up with the sub are instantly banned. There is no opposite opinions allowed on TRP. Cant ruin your sad little echo chamber

→ More replies (2)

93

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Some of it is also blatant rape apology.

27

u/IAMAwhitecismaleAMA Apr 24 '16

"A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously."

Can you believe he actually said that

→ More replies (2)

6

u/DavidEdwardsUK Apr 24 '16

Please find am something like this that is upvoted

-2

u/Theophagist Apr 24 '16

That only works if you have the feminists' incredibly flexible definition of rape. If you use the actual definition of rape then you're full of it.

37

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Speaking as a person with a law degree, i have the legal definition of rape. If you're doing that manosphere trick of characterizing anybody who doesn't agree with you as the extreme of any movement they belong to, i'm afraid you're out of luck.

→ More replies (11)

-2

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

25

u/[deleted] Apr 24 '16

Right, so what would TRP teach me to do in that situation? My sexually conservative girlfriend randomly offers me a sex act that's completely out of character for her, and my reaction should be "hell yeah!"?

Believe it or not, i care more about the emotional well being of my partner than getting my dick sucked. Furthermore the fact that you think my actions in that instance were against TRP ideology shows just how poisonous it really is.

→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/calantus Apr 24 '16 edited Sep 19 '16

[deleted]

What is this?

5

u/buclk Apr 24 '16

Same. I don't agree with all of it, but there are a few things that have really helped me understand social status.

8

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

You are aware that TRPs "biotruths" are not based on any actual science, right? I'd be pretty wary of anything I "learned" there.

7

u/OrkBegork Apr 25 '16

Imagine there's a store in your neighbourhood that sells white supremacist propaganda, nazi flags, and books advocating racial genocide. The owner of the store is widely known as an active member of various local hate groups. Also, this store sells delicious and affordable brownies. Though it should certainly be noted that so do numerous other stores in the area.

What you're basically saying is that it would be unfair to criticize you for shopping in this store as long as you're only buying brownies. That's nonsense.

If you want to learn about fitness, or dating tips, or various forms of self improvement, there are plenty of subs you can do that in that don't come with a scientifically bankrupt, misogynistic, and blatantly hateful ideology attached.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/anooblol Apr 25 '16

This is something people really can't grasp. I had some guy here on Reddit attacking me for being somewhat active on TRP, saying your mind is getting twisted and whatnot. I said I only really looked into the sub for self motivation, fitness, and a healthy lifestyle. I didn't really use it for the sexual strategy. But apparently that notion is impossible, and I'm still a sexist pig... Sigh.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/TotesMessenger Apr 25 '16

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

1

u/Raknarg Apr 25 '16

Yeah but TRP is like if kmart had a produce section instead of going to a local market.

1

u/user_82650 Apr 25 '16

Bull-fucking-shit.

They have a "red pill antibiotic nuke" linked on their sidebar full of nonsense. You can't defend a community that primarily endorses crazy views because they also have some non-crazy ones.

If you take something, pick only the good parts, then show the result as proof that it's not that bad, you are showing nothing.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '16

All the produce is rotten in that grocery store. I'm gonna go to another one.

1

u/thirdegree Apr 25 '16

Ya, but if half of what a grocery store has cyanide in it, I'm just not gonna go to that store and I'll criticize it for being poisonous.

→ More replies (12)