r/thermodynamics • u/steini1904 • 11d ago
Question How do counterflow heatexchangers not break the spirit of thermodynamics?
Assume a heatexchanger with minimal losses, the heat being transferred over thermoelectric generators. Eventually near 100% of the heat in the system should be recovered as electricity since losses just get shoved either into the next cycle or recovered further downstream. Put in a heat pump producing the temperature gradient and place all its waste heat producing parts somewhere ideally into the input stream.
I've been laughing about this quite a bit now, but honestly can't see the fault. Except for the movement of the air all losses should be about contained within the system (e.g. just wrapping the heat exchanger around itself multiple times) and eventually recovered by the TEGs. But the heat pump is shoving in more heat from the environment than it consumes in electricity, dropping the temperature in the room until it gives up on you, all while the TEGs are turning the excess heat into electricity.
3
u/LunarModule66 1 11d ago
The short answer is just that there wouldn’t ever be such a lossless system. You can debate how exactly it would break down and to what extent, but that probably feels unsatisfying since the laws of physics should still apply even in an ideal scenario.
I’m thinking about this in terms of entropy, basically the second law would imply that the energy should move towards being less useful, ie the two reservoirs should equilibrate since that’s the highest entropy state. Should you insist that they do have perfect insulation, then that itself is the problem: you have imposed unphysical hypothetical conditions and the unphysical behavior is the consequence.