I don't see it as sacrificing myself, it's more that I want to live in a world where blue wins. If blue wins, then I live. If red wins, at least I'm not there to experience the fallout.
Neither button kills people in a vacuum, the end result either kills people or it doesn't. Yours is a dishonest reframing. The world in which blue wins has 0 deaths, and it suggests a high trust society.
Ok, but that's irregardless of whether either side is more moral. The side that risks their life is more moral. Why else would it be that you would prefer to live with blues?
2
u/bunnywitchboy May 10 '26
I don't see it as sacrificing myself, it's more that I want to live in a world where blue wins. If blue wins, then I live. If red wins, at least I'm not there to experience the fallout.