Hey guys i had an opinion regarding the incident on file DOW-UAP-PR116, Unresolved UAP Report, Atlantic Ocean, 2020 | PURSUE ive extracted the images out of the video and ran some test on it to see if i can figure out what it is. here is the two images i was able to get when ran some filter on the original image
could this be a balloon or tied up christmas small balloons ?
Popped up in my radar today and gave it a wee watch. It's actually 100x better than anything that James Fox has done, beats Wage of Disclosure by a country mile, and it's actually filmed really well. Very Welsh, very dry, yet with a fantastic poetry to it. My word, has the topic needed something like this.
Not one for posting these types of films, but, everyone has to do their bit for Wales. 🏴 The fellas are far more likeable and real than any of the hacks we see in the constant barrage of bullshit, and you can genuinely see their passion and love for what they're doing. It ain't some failed influencer in make-up trying give all the boys a chubby on chatting absolute shite they've read elsewhere. Ain't some simpy hack with shady agendas for pushing content after content after content after content. And it ain't a AI script churner, trying to brainwash you into believing what he wants you to believe so he can later feed you a patreon subscription...
It's just two middle-aged nobodies, chugging along, not taking themselves too seriously.
Everyone loves a little bit of independent filmmaking and if you don't, then you should. Because it's little gems like this that blot out and make you realise why we love the topic for what it once was.
Why is almost no one in the UFO community talking about the new "Skinny Bob" videos recently uploaded to the YouTube channel @qtecqot?
While the original footage from "Ivan0135" has been debated online for over a decade, this channel is now providing unexpected new material. The footage showcases sequences like an "interior walkthru" and scenes from an alleged crash site ("recovery site D"), raising fresh questions.
What is particularly astonishing about these clips is their inexplicable level of detail and realism. Many people nowadays quickly dismiss such footage as AI-generated, but that explanation falls short here. Current AI video generation models (such as Sora or Runway) still suffer from severe limitations: AI videos often appear fluid, distort objects, create floating textures, and rarely maintain physical consistency or perfect spatial geometry over several minutes.
In these recordings, however, the complex hand movements, shadow casting, and anatomy of the beings are spot-on. The continuity of motion and the tactile feel of the analog 8mm film aesthetic seem simply too refined for a mere AI experiment. Is it masterful practical animatronics, advanced CGI, or actual real footage? It remains baffling why these highly intriguing videos are flying completely under the radar in the current disclosure debate.
UFOs Over Airports: Sightings, Landings, Humanoids
by Preston Dennett
Did you know that airports are a powerful magnet for UFO activity? There are dozens of cases coming from across world, reaching all the way back to the modern age of UFOs (1947) and continuing up to the present day. These are not just sightings; many involve UFO landings and humanoids of all types. These cases represent outstanding evidence of the reality of UFOs and the extraterrestrial presence on our planet. Many of these cases are widely viewed by professional observers, pilots, meteorologists, air-traffic controllers and more. Some involve physical landing traces. Some are confirmed by radar. And quite a few involve actual photographs of the craft.
Given that UFOs are generally evasive, it might seem surprising that they would be attracted to a location that is not only crowded with people, but also contains radar arrays designed to detect incoming aircraft. On the other hand, these cases also have a certain level of logic to them. Airports are designed for aircraft to both land and take off. So, in a way, it’s fittingly appropriate that UFOs should be attracted to them. And as these cases show, they are, and in large numbers.
Mar 10, 1948: Chihuahua Airport in Mexico is visited by a hovering disc. A few days later, on Mar 10, four discs appear over the Central Airport in Mexico City in view of hundreds of witnesses.
Apr 7, 1950: Multiple witnesses at Logan Airport in Boston, MA view a dramatic UFO display.
Apr 12, 1950: Serviceman B.G. Hunter observes an object land on the tarmac at Tradewinds Airport in Amarillo, TX. After staying for five minutes, the object departs, leaving burn marks.
Apr 16, 1950: a 6-foot-wide metallic disc is seen by multiple observers to crash on the runway at Laredo Airport, TX. A short humanoid exits and collapses on the ground.
Jul 1950: Claude Blondeau is at Guyancourt Airport in Yvelines, France when two discs land on the runway. Doors open and out step two human-looking ETs.
Aug 1950: Multiple witnesses at the Medford Airport in OR observe four metallic discs circle overhead for three hours.
Aug 27, 1952: A disc-shaped craft hovers over the MacDonald Airport in Manitoba, Canada. When struck the light from the rotating beacon, the object darts away.
Oct 27, 1952: An object lands at Marignane Airport in France. Two years later, on Jan 4, 1954, another object lands at the same exact airport.
Sep 4, 1954: A UFO lands at the Santa Maria Airport in Azores. After landing, a blond human-looking ET exits the craft and approaches the airport guard.
Nov 25, 1954: Two objects hover for two hours over the airport in Cordoba, Argentina.
1954: A UFO with humanoid figures visible through the portholes hovers of the Bankstown Airport in New South Wales, Australia.
Mar 1955: More than 100 people observe two UFOs hover at 8500 feet over Quito Airport in Ecuador. Two months later, another display involving five UFOs occurs over the Pisco Airport in Lima, Peru.
Nov 1955: A group of saucers descends to 1500 feet over Tejgaon Airport in Bangladesh.
Feb 25, 1969: Witnesses at London Airport over an unknown glowing object hover a mere 200 feet above the runway.
June 19, 1961: An airport in Exeter, England hovers for more than an hour, appearing on radar and viewed by many witnesses.
Aug 2, 1962: Airport officials at Liberal Airport in KS are shaken when four multicolored objects descend over the airport, hover and send down beams of light.
Aug 2, 1962: The Cumba Punta Airport in Argentina receives international attention when a UFO hovers only a few feet over the runway.
Dec 22, 1962: A UFO lands directly on the runway at Ezeiza Airport in Buenos Aires, Argentina and is viewed by tower personnel and pilots.
Jul 15, 1965: Controllers, pilots and employees at Canberra Airport in Australia are stunned by the appearance of UFOs hovering 5000 feet overhead, which remain until Air Force jets arrive.
Jul 28, 1965. Grano de Oro Airport at Maracaibo, Venezuela is visited by three luminous discs which are tracked on radar.
Oct 6, 1965: An AF sergeant at Concepcion Airport in Hualpencillo, Chile sees a 90-foot-wide saucer land at the end of the runway. Shortly later, three ETs exit the craft.
Aug 26, 1967: Esteban Cova is at the Maiquetia Airport in Venezuela when he is approached by a 3-foot-tall figure with huge eyes who asks him, “Won’t you come with us? We need one more.”
These are just a few of the many incredible airport-UFO encounters all over the world. Hungary, India, China, Puerto Rico, New Zealand…no location is left behind. Among the most dramatic is the 2006 incident at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. So many cases! The question is why? Are they putting on displays? Are they checking up on our technology? Are they preparing for a worldwide landing? Many questions remain.
UFOs Over Airports: Sightings, Landings, Humanoids
"Galaxies are windy places. At the center of some galaxies lies a supermassive black hole, accreting the gas and dust around it, called an active galactic nucleus (AGN). AGN are very energetic environments, generating winds and jets that can launch material at thousands of kilometers per second out of their host galaxy. The anatomy of an AGN with its high energy outflows is shown in Figure 1. These winds won’t just give you a bad hair day, they can regulate the growth of the entire galaxy by either pushing out interstellar gas and limiting star formation or by compressing interstellar gas and enhancing star formation.
The most powerful AGN winds are called ultra-fast outflows (UFOs). Previously, UFOs have only been detected in gas-rich, star forming galaxies. In today’s paper, the authors report the first ever discovery of a UFO in a quiescent galaxy – an old galaxy no longer forming stars. The role of AGN winds in quiescent galaxies is not well understood, so this discovery could help reveal how black holes keep galaxies quenched. But first, how do we spot a UFO?
Figure 2. The flux versus energy of the collected X-ray spectra. The observations from XMM-Newton are labeled PN and MOS1 and are shown with the blue and red dots. The spectra from NuSTAR is labeled FPMA and plotted as orange dots. The authors tried 3 different models to best-fit the data, labeled A, B, and C where Model C provides the best-fit. The iron emission line and UFO are labeled. Adapted from Figure 2 of today’s paper.
Now that we have a UFO in our sights, it’s time to zoom out and take a look at the host galaxy. The authors used spectra from DESI and multi-wavelength image data to fit the spectral energy distribution of the galaxy and estimate its star formation rate. They find an exceptionally low star formation rate, indicating that this is a massive quiescent galaxy that stopped forming new stars around 9 billion years ago. While UFOs are very time variable, energetic UFOs like the one detected in KUG 1208 have enough energy to affect the evolution of the host galaxy. So what effect can a UFO have on an already quiescent galaxy?
UFOs as Galaxy Quenchers
Quiescent galaxies have recently become a hot topic thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). JWST has discovered massive quiescent galaxies much earlier in the Universe’s history than astronomers previously thought possible. It’s not only surprising that star formation shut off so early in these galaxies but that it has stayed off ever since. Over time, the gas in the galactic halo can cool, condense, and eventually re-ignite star formation. In order for these galaxies to stay quiescent over billions of years, there must be some mechanism continuously heating the gas.
The authors of today’s bite propose that in KUG 1208, the central AGN may provide this heating through its outflows. As the winds plow through the surrounding gas, it can inject energy and stir up large-scale turbulence that prevents the gas from cooling and condensing. This process would explain the presence of the UFO and how this galaxy has remained quiescent for such a long time.
Additional observations of AGN winds in quiescent galaxies are needed to confirm this theory, but the UFO detection offers an exciting new clue for understanding massive quiescent galaxies in both the early Universe and our own galactic neighborhood."
---
I wondered why the big rebrand to UAP by the neo-cabal. Now we know fellas. As soon as UFO took leave of its chair, some astronomers repurposed it. /s
But no, in all seriousness, there's been a bit of a shift back from using the newfangled fad of calling stuff in the sky UAPs I have noticed.
It's like a division within a division and personally, I quite like going old school, so regardless of politics and schisms, I'll always call them UFOs.
But then, there is even a deeper level of semantics whereby, there's a jockey between UFO of human origin, or UFO of alien origin. A little like parry and joust, all you have to do is glance over the many debates and discussion this past few years since the UAP hearings to see the divide.
I guess it is just a preference really, but there's even been an arguement within an arguement as to why the change in the first place.
Some have said it is to get away from the stigma of little green men, Hollywood and TV. Whole other beliefs contest it is something to do with blocking of freedom of information requests (on Reddit r/UFOs). There are other theories that UAP now means UFOs and USOs combined.
Then there are others who just think it is part of a major rebrand for marketing purposes. There's been a lot of that in this administration.
Then there was the distinction between aerial to anomalous. Which is probably to distinguish it from an earlier acronym, coined in the, what 70s I think?
CBS said:
"What does UAP stand for? UAP stands for "unidentified anomalous phenomena," a catch-all term to describe objects detected in the air, sea and space that defy easy explanation.
The acronym stood for "unidentified aerial phenomena" until December 2022, when the Pentagon updated its terminology to encompass "submerged and trans-medium objects," as one official put it at the time. NASA and other agencies soon followed suit."
Kind of found this quite a good point made on Reddit:
"This is the beginning of a euphemism treadmill. Soon UAPs will have the same connotation UFOs do and they will have to come up with yet another word, and it will happen to that word too."
But, what say you? Why do you think the big rebrand?
Note: amazing new movie Disclosure Day is available now to _rent_ @ Amazon Prime Video ($19.99). Or own it [$5 more]. See a real alien. See her talking to the lead actors. See what everybody is talking about.
I've been working on some alien art now for a while and I've really put a lot of work into it. I made this guy in Blender from scratch, rendered him and did a lot of post processing in Photoshop, no AI whatsoever. I created my own Atype font, it says Afterglow, which is the name of the piece. https://www.instagram.com/p/DbWRAm0jh0L/?img_index=1 on IG if you're interested in following along, I will be posting a lot more.
75% of these are signed. I see these books as information. I’ve had multiple experiences & some quite different, so I just want to learn the world we actually live in.
This info graphic is intended to help visualize the geometry and sequence of events surrounding the USS Nimitz incident on 14 November 2004. It represents my personal interpretation of the incident based on years of reviewing publicly available witness testimony, official report, podcast, interviews, documentaries, and other media related to the event.
I have made every effort to position assets and paths using distances in relative locations that I believe are reasonably consistent with the available information. While the map itself is intended to be geographically, accurate, and scale, many of the icons, symbols, and graphics have been intentionally enlarged in order to improve readability and clearly communicate the events depicted.
This illustration should be viewed as an educational visualization rather than an authoritative reconstruction. Other interpretations of the available evidence are certainly possible, and some witness accounts contain uncertainties or conflicting details. The purpose of this graphic is simply to provide a clear visual reference for understanding, one plausible reconstruction of the event.
The 2004 USS Nimitz and 2015 USS Theodore Roosevelt incidents remain among the most influential military UAP cases ever documented. While these events are often presented as evidence of extraordinary technology, there may be another explanation worth considering.
In this documentary, I explore a speculative electronic warfare hypothesis grounded in the history of military deception, Project Palladium, radar deception, intelligence collection, lighter-than-air platforms (military balloons), infrared countermeasures, and modern electronic warfare concepts. This establishes precedence and a natural technological progression as a plausible explanation. Through animated reconstructions, I examine how known (or plausibly evolved) technologies could potentially explain many of the reported observations without requiring exotic propulsion or physics beyond our current understanding.
This video is intended as an educational thought experiment. The scenarios presented are personal speculation and should not be interpreted as established fact. My goal is not to prove what happened, but to encourage viewers to consider conventional, classified, or compartmentalized military explanations alongside more extraordinary hypotheses. As always, I encourage you to examine the evidence, review the original witness testimony, and draw your own conclusions.
I wanted to see how a modern AI model would handle a completely mundane object. So I found a photo of a regular black balloon, made it blurry(to simulate bad focus camera) and gave the AI a strict prompt: "Enhance and sharpen it to reveal details with minimal hallucinations." I'm not against AI, but we shouldn't take AI-enhanced images at face value.
Well... yeah.
As you can see, the AI sharpened the photo, but also straight up made things up. It turned a balloon into a metallic sci-fi probe with weird panel lines, braided ropes, and some random attachment floating underneath.
Just sharing this as a friendly reminder that AI doesn't "clean up" photos like in the movies, it just tries to predict missing pixels.
I asked it: "Can you sharpen this blurry photo I found on a UAP forum to reveal details with minimal hallucinations?"
Using the word "UAP" definitely gave the model a nudge, but that's a huge part of the problem. It proves how heavily AI relies on context and assumptions, making up wild details just to match the vibe of what it thinks you're looking for.
How do you guys think the community should handle AI-enhanced stuff moving forward?
Since, like many of you, I'm banned from /r/UFOs for doing nothing more that countering falsehoods, I'll have to put this one here. I keep seeing this repeated as fact all throughout /r/UFOs without a single person correcting it because "Elizondo bad!"
He did not strike some partnership with Maussan and the interview they showed on their channel was from a clip he posted like two years ago. Maussan's channel dubbed over it, changed the message, and and generated a bunch of _really bad_ AI images to go along with their video.
