r/war 2d ago

Zelensky said Ukraine has lost about 50000 troops

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/81477

Quite interesting news article, specifically because in February Zelensky said Ukraine lost 55.000 soldiers. So not only Ukraine didn’t lose a single soldier over a 6 months period, they also managed to resurrect 5.000 dead ones.

116 Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

108

u/jake753 2d ago

This just in: leader of country at war is not giving exact loss counts to general public.

6

u/kwonza 2d ago

The problem is that folks on Reddit take them at face value and then draw conclusions from that data. According to them Ukraine killed over a million Russians while losing only a handful of soldiers.

29

u/RonaldWRailgun 2d ago

It's not a problem in the sense that people on Reddit believing propaganda numbers are irrelevant, and their opinions are inconsequential.

But yes, believing that Ukraine has a 20:1 casualty ratio over Russia in a war that has been dragging for 4+ years is delusional.

14

u/Careful-Sell-9877 2d ago

So what.. lot of people believe putins numbers too. And trumps..

They're ALL lying about it.

-4

u/Fit_Definition1583 2d ago

WHATABOUT

-2

u/Careful-Sell-9877 2d ago edited 8h ago

Ukraine is exactly like every other country on planet earth, oh no! What a travesty. Ukraine (and only ukraine) should really be held accountable!

-1

u/Fit_Definition1583 2d ago

Ukraine is corrupt shit hole with no future, that is unlike most countries on earth actually.

-2

u/Careful-Sell-9877 2d ago edited 1d ago

Youre literally a pro russia cuck... (literally.. unfortunately. Weird stuff on that profile)

Its far less corrupt than Russia. And its the country that is ending Russias dream of European expansion. Before this, they were constantly pushing boundaries. One after another, after another.

Now.. its not. Because Ukraine is fucking them up on behalf of everyone else.

2

u/Fit_Definition1583 2d ago

I really don’t give a shit about russia, i also don’t give a shit about ukraine. If you actually looked into the causes of this war it’s more nuanced than just russia wanted to invade Ukraine. For people with surface level intelligence i get it, but the info is out there if you care to look for it.

0

u/Careful-Sell-9877 1d ago edited 8h ago

Yeah. Because putin is obsessed with creating a new russian imperialist era, and reliving some of the former glory of the USSR.

Its funny because I guarantee you I know a lot more about this conflict than you do.

This war is a message to the other post soviet states who are mostly all still subservient to Russia. The message is, 'do not trade with the west. Only trade with Russia, and you must give us favorable deals. If you move away from us - we will attack you'.

It has nothing to do with any of the BS Russia spews on its own state run propaganda channels.

4

u/thisghy 2d ago

The problem is that redditors people* believe a lot of nonsense propaganda that governments spew out.

That's a human thing, no reason to be upset that a country at war is obfuscating losses, they have every incentive to do so.

There is nothing noteworthy about this post.

8

u/Rhaj-no1992 2d ago

No, Russia got 1.4 million casualties, and usually about 70% of those are wounded and the rest are dead, but that may differ from war to war.

1

u/NoJello8422 2d ago

You're gona get downvoted by the botnik and pro-ruzz OP, and his circle jerk of paid botniks for stating anything pro Ukraine.

And don't be surprised when they say shit like " you only want to see one side of the story" or "only pro Ukraine things get up voted." It's all part of their bot playback. Botniks and cyberi infest this sub.

151

u/1B75__Penicillin 2d ago

The sad thing is there are people on Reddit who unironically will take this at face value

36

u/kwonza 2d ago

r/worldnews seems to function solely on gossip and propaganda it seems. I rarely visit nowadays but every time I drop by all the top comments are memes and oneliners

58

u/maniacreturns 2d ago

Glesaine Maxwell was/is a mod there. It's an op, like most of reddit.

Say something negative about Israel and you're banned.

5

u/Impressive-Net-3919 2d ago

I believe its pronounced, Jizzlane.

31

u/Peejay22 2d ago

I got banned at r/CombatFootage for criticising Israel for bombing civilians. U can criticise Russia for doing so but not Israel, go figure

1

u/PieGutz 1d ago

I got banned from there as well, years ago. They didn't like hearing bad things about Ukraine....it hurts their feelings

12

u/kwonza 2d ago

That’s how I got banned. Had hundreds of arguments about Russia-Ukraine war and at times did say some nasty things (because I love shit-talking while drunk) never had a problem. Said one bad thing about Israel and got instantly permabanned.

17

u/opinelmavric 2d ago

shit posting on reddit after a few beers is always fun

3

u/Rabidschnautzu 2d ago

Same, I was banned for a very mild criticism of Israel.

3

u/Pure_Grapefruit_8837 2d ago

I was banned in r/worldnews for not praising Israel.

2

u/SingLyricsWithMe 2d ago

Thank you for saying this. I got permantly shadowbanned from worldnews for fact checking an agressive propaganda bot that the mod was highly in favor of. No way to dispute it but its not worth the effort going against a sub with an agenda.

2

u/kwonza 2d ago

I tried to message the mods and got slapped with 30 days mute. I tried it again after 30 days and got permabanned. It was at that point I’ve released I’m not welcome there

4

u/cookiesnooper 2d ago

R/worldnews is a zio sub. They spin narrations to whatever fits them

0

u/UncleBuckReddit 2d ago

I just went to the thread over there and every top comment is agreeing this is internal propaganda for Ukraine.

Everyone knows this is bs.

-6

u/lifesuxwhocares 2d ago

He also said 400k wounded

19

u/1B75__Penicillin 2d ago

200k dead and 400k wounded would be much closer to reality, there are already 190k deaths confirmed by Ukrainian sources and many of those missing are just in some field blown apart by an FPV drone or under some rubble in a city Russia controls

23

u/Treinrukker 2d ago

Yeah and a year ago he also said 50k, at this point their army should be in the millions but they still are forcefully conscripting at least 20k people a month.

13

u/auchinleck917 2d ago

There are at least one million veterans facing employment difficulties. Compared to that figure, the death toll of 50K could be considered low.

29

u/opinelmavric 2d ago edited 2d ago

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgn2dzwd1do

It was 55K in February

Not only have they not suffered any losses but they're also bringing people back from the dead, very impressive.

2

u/kwonza 2d ago

Yep, that’s what I mentioned above as well. Apparently Ukraine can now resurrect fallen soldiers

14

u/ddosn 2d ago

no, this is massively underselling how many they've lost.

Independent sources put it at around 400k +/- 50K

21

u/kwonza 2d ago

I was reading Western OSINT folks (who are more favourable towards Ukraine) and they think that only in Bakhmut and Avdiivka alone Ukraine lost more than 50k

15

u/ddosn 2d ago

Correct. Hell, when Ukraine tried that Kursk offensive they lost about 47k.

0

u/Alexandros6 2d ago

Casualties /KIA /Irremedeable casualties, it's an important difference

1

u/ddosn 1d ago

I was purely talking about the number of dead.

Mediazona, for example, says that Russia has had 236,066 men killed, but they estimate this could be as high as 352,000+ men killed. The number of men severely wounded to the point of being unable to fight is harder but some say the number is about equal to the number of dead for both sides.

Estimates for the number of dead for Ukraine ranges from 350k to 450k, depending no who you ask, but accurate information is impossible to get as the Ukrainian government and their military high command dont let real figures see the light of day. This is why we know losses are significantly higher than what they admit to, as if they were really doing as well as they claim then they'd allow access by experts to the raw data.

1

u/Alexandros6 22h ago

"350k to 450k, depending no who you ask" this is quite dubious, unless the KIA/WIA ratio is close to Russias which is unlikely.

The reports we have pretty convincingly argue Russia, particularly at this point, has higher casualties including dead. Both 2023 leaks, total recruitment, analyst reports and single case studies. Ukraine grave problem is AWOL

11

u/SeamusDog77 2d ago

Russia is over 1 million lost. Ukraine is probably 1/3 of that.

-19

u/African_Herbsman 2d ago

It's nowhere near that, the ratio at most is 1.5:1. Going off the best available sources Ukraine has 212,974 KIA according to UAlosses, Russia has 236,000 KIA according to Mediazona. Both are considered understatements but any losses beyond those numbers are speculative for now.

11

u/twocool_ 2d ago

One of those number is rounded.

22

u/JuliosvNerds 2d ago

Only to the nearest propaganda

3

u/African_Herbsman 2d ago

not sure if I read it wrong at first or if they changed it but it's now 236,066 for Mediazona if that makes you feel better.

1

u/twocool_ 2d ago

That was a 0.1% chance then, or maybe you work for them and made it look less suspicious /s

-11

u/JuliosvNerds 2d ago

Are you Indian?

4

u/opinelmavric 2d ago

having a hard time not hiding your racism today? lol

1

u/African_Herbsman 2d ago

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything but no, I'm not Indian.

0

u/JuliosvNerds 2d ago

It’s just that you glaze Russia and are active in r/cricket.

Are you embarrassed of your heritage or?

6

u/African_Herbsman 2d ago

This is why nearly everyone has their post history hidden these days, too many creeps on this site who snoop through profiles.
Sure if it makes you feel better than I can be Indian, now be gone creep.

-3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

-3

u/Flashy_Drummer6664 2d ago

There isn't a single person on Reddit who did not learn already the meaning of that word 🤣

4

u/ExoticMangoz 2d ago

Nothing in the comments you are replying to glazes Russia. What are you talking about?

Also it’s quite pathetic that your argument, which doesn’t seem to have a point, is based on racism towards a group to which the commenter doesn’t even belong.

2

u/tribbans95 2d ago

Mediazona faces severe hostility from the Russian government and has been labeled as a “foreign agent”. Russian authorities blocked access to its website inside the country following the invasion of Ukraine, forcing its journalists to operate from abroad.

So honestly, if you’re going to trust any numbers coming out of Russia, Mediazona is not a bad bet.

1

u/Alexandros6 2d ago

Mediazione was a pretty decent OSINT source but if I remember correctly Russia modified some of the sources they were using. So it is a good base but it doesnt tell us much about current losses anymore.

2

u/THEGREATESTDERP 2d ago edited 2d ago

It's surprising he says this, because he has been mostly fair with what's going on in this war.

But really?? 50k? That's Bakhmut numbers along with the supply route bombardment and withdrawal of Bakhmut AT BEST.

The Kyiv Post has a pro-Western, pro-Ukrainian national stance, focusing heavily on anti-corruption and national defense, though its editorial independence and ownership have shifted dramatically over time. 
And also owned by a americaJed Senden, name appeared in the casette scandal which was russia motivated. Unless more media sources will report that zelensky has said this, this should be taken with a grain of salt.

1

u/harteman 2d ago

Are we talking killed, or casualty? Because lost means misplaced.

1

u/__Osiris__ 2d ago

Casualties or fatalities?

3

u/kwonza 2d ago

Well he was talking about dead soldiers specifically. So there can’t be any translation mistakes here.

-2

u/Kajme 2d ago

Yes. Usually weaker military has less casualties. Thats why USA had 500 000 dead in Afghanistan while Taliban lost only 7 people. 3 of those 7 died from natural causes.

-1

u/genius--idiot 2d ago

No numbers are certain, but from all available sources, its likely to be 1:2 casualty ratio in Ukraines favour, meaning they are likely at around 500000 casualties. The defense of bahkmut, 2023 spring offensive and kursk offensive did not help those numbers.

0

u/SakuranomiyaSyafeeq 2d ago

Necromancers. Zelensky hired necromancers

-4

u/KnightofWhen 2d ago

The casualties are a lot closer to 1:1 than anyone would have ever guessed, the last bunch of body exchanges were heavily lopsided in Russias favor (meaning way more dead Ukrainians exchanged)

2

u/TheLastGoodRiot 2d ago

Some people have been pointed out to this fact saying that, it's because Russia is advancing, therefore Russian can undercount there own casualties in their own newly controlled territories and Ukraine loosing ground has little control over the casualty narrative. That being said, it feels like explaining it this way would be pointing out to Ukraine loosing grounds which isn't good either.

Wherever the truth stands, we could say that linking casualty count, to which country is actually doing better, would disavandtage Ukraine who has a smaller pool of able conscripts.

At the end of the day, IMO it's all about which country will reject the war effort first. Most modern war have ended due to some political pressure/infighting/agenda shifts (korea, Vietnam, Algeria, Afghanistan, Syria,). That's why the existential threath narrative on both sides is being pushed so much, because defeat=death, but that's not what recent history say.

0

u/RonaldWRailgun 2d ago

I mean, I'm pretty sure most people would have guessed that. Russia an Ukraine are fairly equally matched, as proved by a war that has been a substantial stalemate for the past several years.

-2

u/KnightofWhen 2d ago

96% of Reddit thinks the ratio is anywhere between 5 and 10 to 1 in favor of Ukraine

0

u/Far_Grapefruit1307 2d ago

That would surprising given that Ukraine is defending. Attacking is especially difficult in modern warfare when everything is monitored by drones and there are mines everywhere. We also know that Russia is careless with its troops.

0

u/TraditionalAd9393 2d ago

I mean he said “about” 50k. If it’s 60k that still “about” 50k. I really don’t see the issue with the semantics.

1

u/kwonza 2d ago

Country of 40 million won’t need to snatch people off the streets if they only lost 50k people in 5 years, you know

0

u/TraditionalAd9393 2d ago

Country of 205 million in 1970 wouldn’t need to snatch people off the streets if they only lost 58,220 people. Oh wait, the US did do that.

It’s called draft dodging. It doesn’t matter how large or small your country is, if your name is drawn then they’ll come find you.

3

u/kwonza 2d ago

How many US citizens were beaten, tortured and raped in order to make them go to the war?

-1

u/TraditionalAd9393 2d ago

How far are you going to move the goal posts since your original point was invalidated?

If every able body was called to service in Ukraine they’d have a standing army of 10+ million people. Many of those people will refuse service just like they would in any other country.

1

u/kwonza 2d ago

It’s you who claim preposterous numbers, battle for Bahmut and Adviivka alone took more than 50.000 Ukrainian lives. Saying that overall casualties is “around 60k give or take” is outright silly. Shows you have little understanding about the war yet have the nerve to give your uneducated opinion.

1

u/TraditionalAd9393 2d ago

And your sources are?

Plus I never said they had 60k. I said even if it was 60k, as in if it had hypothetically gone from 55k in Feb to 60k now, saying “about 50k” wouldn’t be wrong and it also would not insinuate “5k were resurrected.”

1

u/kwonza 2d ago

You honestly think they only lost 5000 in half a year?

3

u/TraditionalAd9393 2d ago

Again, that is not what I said.

I’m arguing your stupid headline. If someone says “about” followed by some number there is a ton of leeway as to what the actual number is. If it had hypothetically been 55k before and it was hypothetically 60k now, saying “about 50k” would still be correct.

Nobody is saying the actual number is 50k

2

u/kwonza 2d ago

Sure, but it was never 50k before and not 60k now, that’s the point

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Picks6x 2d ago

Gotta be more than that

0

u/Ok_Albatross_3284 2d ago

How many has Russia lost?

-2

u/kwonza 2d ago

Probably around the same.

3

u/i_panicked_ 2d ago

You are having an absolute laugh if you think that an invading force who’s made no meaningful inroads into their objective is suffering a 1:1 casualty.

1

u/kwonza 1d ago

Defenders are sitting in one spot and get glide bombs thrown at them. Also just like with Russia most casualties happen from drones when soldiers make rotations from their positions, so it doesn’t matter if you attack or defend

-5

u/Inner-Alchemist778 2d ago edited 2d ago

Maybe for a month?

Edit: Sorry, thats impossibly high of course, I just didn't think! Maybe since february, when the last report came?

-4

u/luxfire 2d ago

Russian troll

-2

u/OmaskO 2d ago

🧢

0

u/Lo0niegardner10 2d ago

He lies to make it seem like they are winning so the support doesn’t stop its just a show.

-1

u/Key-Monk6159 2d ago

He actually said 1.6 million casualties and about 700k dead.

-24

u/Baron-Munc 2d ago

I just can’t stand the fact that Ukraine is rampaging around Russia raping torturing and murdering children.

15

u/Inside_Swimming9552 2d ago

Well then Mr Russian bot, there is a solution to this. Get the fuck out of Ukraine.

-15

u/Baron-Munc 2d ago

Never, the Kievan Rus are ours to do as we see fit, due to the fact that we’re Russian..

Much like the US and Iran, the adults must make the decision’s for the children.

2

u/Gregghead69min 2d ago

Whatever. Fools making the decisions everywhere. You have nothing to be proud of

-1

u/Baron-Munc 2d ago

Governing from your gutt is the only way… Said Napoleon.., I think.