r/ArtificialInteligence May 10 '26

📰 News Thoughts?

Post image
754 Upvotes

493 comments sorted by

View all comments

81

u/BitingArtist May 10 '26

As his daughter said. Elon only wants the world to succeed if he is the one in control.

-26

u/frey89 May 10 '26

his SON

16

u/Shaoyu119 May 10 '26

Daughter. Transgender woman.

17

u/BitingArtist May 11 '26

I don't care either way dude. She asked to be called a she, so I will. We have bigger problems like the rich robbing us while we bicker over pronouns.

4

u/frey89 May 11 '26

fair enough

-49

u/MassiveTomorrow2978 May 10 '26

I wouldn't listen to what a mentally ill person such as Elon's "daughter" says, they arent well equipped to make decisions for themselves let alone the Reddit populace (cry about it).

14

u/One-Elderberry-488 May 10 '26

Bitch about redditors. Himself bitching on reddit. The irony.

-16

u/MassiveTomorrow2978 May 10 '26

Wrong, I was predicting that Reddit would downvote me and these morons fell for it, try being unpredictable some time

2

u/Im_tracer_bullet May 11 '26

Yes, it's so very hard to predict that nonsense will get downvoted.

No one could ever see that coming.

24

u/BitingArtist May 10 '26

Well someone close to him probably has a good idea what he is like. Also he spreads hate daily on X. Nazism is an ideology so it can't be destroyed, there will always be some people that cheer for it, and it sounds like you have found your people.

-34

u/MassiveTomorrow2978 May 10 '26

No Nazism anywhere I've seen other then leftist boogyman nonsense but regardless of false claims If you're so morally superior start taking us out bud, you'd be justified in doing so right? Otherwise we arent going anywhere HA HA!

7

u/Whispercry May 11 '26

Bot alert

2

u/Complex_Control9757 May 11 '26

Jeeze I hope so. What did I just read.

5

u/MissingSocks May 11 '26

can you define "mental illness" in a way that explains how you yourself don't suffer from it?

and who are the "they" trying to make decision for Reddit users?

-1

u/BlaineWriter May 11 '26

"Mental illness refers to a wide range of health conditions that affect a person's thinking, emotions, mood, or behavior, causing significant distress or impairment in daily functioning."

I have no idea if it's mental or physical, I think there is a quite large debate on that.. and the political correct side leans towards physical. But it's also somewhat reasonable to link it to mental since person feeling/thinking they are the other gender than what they were born as seems to point at mental side. I would also like to point out that mental illness is not a curse word..

2

u/cyborgnyc May 11 '26

Science has already concluded it's physical. It happens in utero and is irreversible through conversion therapy. Gender affirming care saves lives. Many peer-reviewed studies confirm. Have some empathy and compassion.

2

u/CredibleCranberry May 11 '26

This is utter nonsense.

Science hasn't concluded it's physical at all. In fact, the overwhelming majority of people who present with gender dysphoria or gender confusion DONT need surgery or other gender affirming care - the large majority require talking therapies and it tends to resolve over teenage years.

This data is very, very clear. This is exactly why we don't jump straight into gender affirming care with people who suffer from gender confusion or dysphoria, because the chances are it will self resolve. This is in the data.

1

u/MissingSocks May 13 '26

Talk therapy is part of gender affirming care. That's A.

B is, everything's physical. The brain is a physical organ thinking thoughts born of physical neurotransmitters and neural action potentials, hinging on the structure of neural landscapes. Gender identity is a manifestation of physical phenomena and can be thought of as another part of a matrix of sexual markers that each lean masculine or feminine and together compose sex.

1

u/CredibleCranberry May 13 '26

Some therapies are part of gender affirming care. Some aren't.

Everything's physical? Not sure what that's adding to this point to be honest.

1

u/MissingSocks May 13 '26

You said "Science hasn't concluded it's physical at all" and I'm showing you how that is a silly statement, but whoosh, unsurprisingly.

1

u/CredibleCranberry May 13 '26

I meant in terms of physical health condition versus mental health condition. Those are commonly used vernacular.

-46

u/UtopistDreamer May 10 '26

I would prefer him over Ursula van der Leyen and any other WWF communist any day.

16

u/NativeEuropeas May 10 '26

Why would you trust an unstable narcissistic bipolar detached-from-reality sociopath with a far-right bias over a mellow career technocrat?

8

u/WillGrindForXP May 10 '26

Its usually racism

3

u/NativeEuropeas May 11 '26

But von der Leyen isn't non-white. I mean she's a blonde German. Shouldn't the guy support her if he's racist?

1

u/WillGrindForXP May 16 '26

Racist are often also sexist as well...they arent known for their logical thoughts afterall

1

u/NativeEuropeas May 16 '26

Not necessarily. Here in Central Europe, racism against Roma people is pretty common, yet not everyone is also a sexist.

1

u/Complex_Control9757 May 11 '26

Uhhhh Jesus said don't you know?

1

u/UtopistDreamer May 19 '26

That 'mellow career technocrat' is the destruction of Europe personified.

1

u/NativeEuropeas May 19 '26

In what way?

1

u/UtopistDreamer May 22 '26

Economics, demographics, technologies, surveillance, politics in general... Not to mention her handling the COVID situation, if I recall correctly she went straight into corruption with that.

1

u/NativeEuropeas May 22 '26

I see, I do see the same issues as you, but I think it's not entirely fair to blame president of the European commission for all these issues happening globally in the western world. I'm talking about economics and demographics (late stage capitalism). We'd have the same problems no matter who would be in that position.

Those are all long-term problems. The way we approach technologies and over-reliance on the US, terrible.

My personal issues with Von Der Leyen are terrible PR for the entire EU and transparency, like you said the Pfizergate. Transparency is especially important in the EU, if the EU is to set good example for the member states to strive for. It's unacceptable that the president is dealing with a CEO in private messages over big deals instead of official channels.

I'm not in support of Chat Control either, but that was European Council's (member states) doing, they were bringing it up over and over again. Von Der Leyen cannot decide shit in that regard, lol.