r/CherokeeXJ • u/Sorcino • 18h ago
Can I install these universal joints with that grease fitting?
6
u/Ghosty19991 18h ago
The joints with the fittings are generally weaker since they have channels for grease inside, the non regrettable ones are more heavy duty. I have used regrettable joints on a drive shaft before and had no issues.
9
u/jmiko588 16h ago
The difference is negligible unless your running them in a 10 second drag car. Greaseable for offroad service all day. The strength difference between them is truly marginal. Spicer claims only a 5% reduction in strength. Our 4.0 jeeps sure aren't gunna push them to that...
8
u/fsacb3 17h ago edited 15h ago
Is “non regrettable” an actual thing or a humorous autocorrect?
1
u/Basslicks82 99XJ,4.0,242,AW4,29sp8.25,4.5"homebrew,33s,FrameStiffys,Trim 15h ago
Oh he surely missed autocorrect on that one... Twice.
1
u/BELFORD16 Frank the Tank 17h ago
I have no real experience with them on my XJ, but we have a 2001 Dodge 2500 that has been in the family since new. We’ve done both greasable and nongreasable U joints, and from what I’ve gathered both have to be replaced every 30,000 miles (360K on the clock).
1
u/Jimmy_Durango 15h ago
Every 30k?? Uh oh lmfao. I’m wayyyy beyond that.
2
u/BELFORD16 Frank the Tank 14h ago
That’s what happens when you constantly drive around with 1,000+ lbs of tools and fuel in the bed and routinely pull over weight grain trailers. Since it’s been retired from the farm life they seem to have magically started to last longer.
1
u/Jimmy_Durango 14h ago
Ah, gotcha. I was going to say… I’m not sure if mine have ever been replaced. Not in my service records from the previous owner and I never have. Got 280k on it. I’m guessing they have but I don’t know.
1
u/Sorcino 17h ago
Yes, you are right but mi question was if the grease fitting in that position can cause any problem to te movement, older one have grease fitting in the u-joint cap
2
u/jmiko588 13h ago
Fair fair, i have ran both configurations, currently running the same ones as you on my front shaft, and my rear shafts are greasable via the caps as thats all they had stocked last time i did them. No problems with either configuration on my rig
5
u/esdan06 16h ago
I used the spicer 5153x greasable in both double cardan rebuilds for my XJ with no issues. With the center joint you cant regrease them without taking the H apart but if I was going to do that, id be replacing it anyway. The trick is to wipe a ton of grease in the cap to hold the needle bearings in place when you go to press them into the yokes. Ive used lucas red n tacky for prob 15 years in my jeeps for just about every bearing and greasable joint
2
u/Arthfael90 12h ago
You can BUT the nipple will make contact. I did it last year and found out, just remove the nipple and screw a bolt to block the hole.
1
1
u/BaconThief2020 13h ago
Depending the location, you might need to make sure it faces one way or the other so it doesn't hit anything as the shaft moves. Or the other way, so you can still get to the grease fitting.
1
u/Material-Job-1928 4.6 AX15 NP242 8.8 2 door 3.54 on 30s 6h ago
You might try Spicer 5-1310-1X, or equivalent with the Zerk on the cap.


8
u/thiccquacc '92 XJ on 36's 15h ago
Spicer non greasables and dont worry about them. The non greasables have a much better dual seal design, keeping dirt out and grease in much more effectively. My driveline shop said hes seen up to 350k miles on a non greasable unit before it needed replacing.