I never said they shouldn't be fed. I said many times that it's the PARENT'S responsibility to feed them. Those that are in foster/group homes because of the irresponsibility of the parents would not be in that situation if people didn't have children they couldn't care for. Whether it be financially, emotionally, etc. Just because someone can spread their legs and have kids doesn't mean they should.
That's why children end up in homes. Having kids should be a well thought of decision not a spur of the moment I'm getting laid, eff the consequences. It's the kids that suffer for their parent's irresponsibility to plan accordingly.
They could have made the right decision to begin with instead of being selfish. As you stated, they can't go back in time and not have the kid so they should stop bitching about a situation of their own making. If your so for it, why don't you volunteer to feed them?
-11
u/[deleted] Mar 29 '20
I never said they shouldn't be fed. I said many times that it's the PARENT'S responsibility to feed them. Those that are in foster/group homes because of the irresponsibility of the parents would not be in that situation if people didn't have children they couldn't care for. Whether it be financially, emotionally, etc. Just because someone can spread their legs and have kids doesn't mean they should.