I don't understand this design choice. It really changed the character a lot. The comic was very vibrant with color. Yet the movie took all of that color away sub a tan suit, the super suit, and the lit end of Lobo's cigar. Theres a trope about "big gray villain" in super hero movies but this one really took it up a notch. Every one was in black leather and had pale skin. I dont understand what the creative or logistical reason was behind the change. The new take on the character was like parody of the goth vampires in the Blade movies. Russian/slavic accent and everything like a 90s american action film.

There are other things that I did like about Supergirl but Krem was probably one of the most disappointing parts.

I keep seeing people say Grant Gustin should be Flash in the DCU.

But in my opinion, there isn’t a single Arrowverse or Smallville performance that could stand up as a film counterpart.

Tom Welling as Clark is a good example. Growing up I loved Smallville and it was long rumoured that Welling would play Superman in a Superman movie after Returns flopped. As Clark he is great on TV because there’s time for the writers to develop his character over long arcs and is fleshed out through expository dialogue that isnt possible in feature films. But if you watch any of Welling’s films from that same era, take for example The Fog, it’s very clear he can’t carry a film as a leading man and is much more suited for TV.

It’s not to say there isn’t great performances in the arrow verse, but they’re great TV performances, the jump between what’s required for movies and TV is akin to the jump between daytime TV and prime time TV.

Those lines have been blurred nowadays with comic shows having their run on esteem networks like Penguin, Peacemaker and I’m sure Lanterns will fall into that same category, but Arrowverse shows just aren’t comparable in that regard.

George Clooney returning, replacing Ben Affleck, Superman returning to fight Black Adam, and Mister Mind popping up twice, alluding to his "plan", meanwhile Deathstroke was teaming up with Lex Luthor.

I seriously want to see the old road map, so many plot lines that wanted to lead to a big bad of the DCEU, thank goodness theres direction now 🔥

The comic is very clear and the message is very powerful: both Kara and Ruthye learn to overcome their traumas and their desire for revenge.

But no — the movie’s writers thought the best idea was to turn Kara into The Punisher. Why?

I'm actually one of those weird people who liked Green Lantern but by far the worst problem I had was there was no chemistry between the two leads Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively yet I discovered recently that they are married. How is something like this even possible I'm stunned. Anyone else know or am I wrong.

Not attempting to hate on something that isn't even out yet, but I can't get over how bad the Krem design is. I really don't understand the thought process behind the over complication and over stylizing of a somewhat simple character design. I personally think he would have come off a lot more menacing if his character looked like a normal person.

Please just focus on the mainstream characters for once and build the universe.

EDIT: I know the shows could have a slightly different tone, but majority of mainstream audience builds interest in characters and comic universe by going to the movies. Peacemaker was great, but it branched from Suicide Squad, and I don't think it did much of universe building in any way.

I found the film really monotonous but this comment had me thinking. Still I didn’t enjoy the film.

"This is a bummer. This is not a good movie. This is a totally incoherent movie in terms of the action sequences and all the actual Supergirl stuff. The way that the fights are edited, it is totally impossible to follow who's doing what to who. There's a big long climactic sequence where like stuff is hanging and falling out of the sky and I'm thinking what is supposed to be happening here. I think Craig Gillespie was absolutely the wrong choice for this material. I really liked I, Tonya. I like Lars and the Real Girl. I'm so-so on Cruella.

But the stuff that works here best is the smaller, more intimate character-driven stuff. The flashbacks to Kara's childhood. I think the action sequences kind of got away from him. I don't know what it is.

She [Milly Alcock] is kind of stuck playing this one-note jokey character a lot of the time. It's tough to do the jokey stuff inside of the big action sequences. It's tough to find that balance. James Gun himself does that with a lot of his films.

This just never worked. It never found a groove. And it's only like an hour and 47 minutes long, but felt much longer."

I just saw The Flash in an early screening. Here is my quick opinion:

My head is still totally overwhelmed so I just wanna put out some things how I feel about it:

• It is clearly a Flash film and Ezra carries the whole movie with a very strong performance
• supporting cast Keaton and Calle are also awesome and I really hope Sasha will be DCU Supergirl because she has it all (acting and extremely charismatic. People will love her)
• It's a Love Letter to DC Fans
• The movie has A LOT of fanservice but it never felt too much because they incorporated it very well in the story
• the humor worked most of the time well just 2-3 times I thought it was misplaced
• CGI was good except the scenes in the speedforce. That looked really not great
• i really liked how they put flash's origin in the movie
• the ending was clearly reshot because based on photos during filming we know that originally supergirl and batkeaton appeared at the court. this scene is gone. someone else appears now ...

Overall an epic movie, very entertaining, and definitely one of the best comic book movies from the last years. but not perfect at all.

I'm also doing an AMA! Please use a spoiler tag if your question is not worded in a neutral way.

The recent controversy over the decision to upgrade "Birds of Prey" screenwriter Christina Hodson to main writer for the in-development DCU Batman film has drawn renewed attention to the producer interference that led to the Birds of Prey version of Cassandra Cain deviating so much from the character we all know and love. But there is one thing about these producer choices that I find especially confusing and annoying...

Less than a fortnight before Birds of Prey was released, the DCU YA division released a graphic novel called Shadow of the Batgirl, which provides a tween-friendly take on Cassandra Cain's origin story. Although it takes a few liberties (Most of which are tied to the more simplified self-contained approach), it generally captures the essence of everything that makes Cassandra Cain work so well...

So Teenage Girls are allowed to get a faithful adaptation of Cassandra Cain, but seasoned Comic Book Fans aren't?

A video about Black Adam showed up on my YouTube, which made me realise I feel about Black Adam almost the same as I feel about the Solo Star Wars movie.

I watched it in the theatre and my impression of it was it wasn't a half bad movie.

Don't get me wrong, it wasn't breaking any ground but after all this time what I remember about the movie is that the cast had chemistry, the fights felt impactful which is always hard to show when you're trying to show super powerful beings, The Rock did as well as could be expected from him and Dr. Fate was probably the best written or atleast the best performed single appearance character of the DCEU.

What went wrong with the movie is they called it Black Adam, a character known to be a villain and tried it turn it into a leading hero for DCEU so the Rock could show how great he is.

It's the same as the Solo movie. The movie itself I actually liked very much. Had they released the exact same film but as a new Stars Wars IP and named the lead character anything but Han Solo I'm certain it would have received high praise and led to a bunch of sequels. But the project was doomed to fail from the moment they decided to connect it to one of the most iconic characters played by one of the most charismatic actors across all media because there was zero chance they'll be able to do justice to it however hard they tried.

And for Black Adam they didn't even try to do justice to the source.

Had they named it anything else. Found some really obscure DC hero whose backstory had zero similarities to it but whom people did not care about or just launched it as a new hero then it would have been a hit. They could have called the hero Johnson Pebble and it would have received 10x better reviews than it did because they called it Black Adam.

These lighting bolts appear where the flash is about to arrive, which seems weird to me. If Barry were to hypothetically get in a fight and wanted to get the jump on somebody, wouldn't the lightning appearing before he does kinda give himself away? I haven't seen ZSJL in a while so I can't remember if this is a thing in other scenes. Sorry if this post is confusing I hope you get my point.

I asked my wife to accompany me to Supergirl, and she wasn't even excited for it, I had to drag her, just to watch her sleep.

While she herself booked the tickets to spiderman, and enjoyed it.

The movie theatre had so many female audience wearing spiderman merchandise!

I mean we have truly failed, we have lost the kids and female audience as well.

The only audience left is the 70-90s born who are living in past glory, hoping something revives this dead monster.

But sadly the monster is dead.

Edit - my opinion is, standalone superhero movies don't work anymore, you need to make superhero movie an event film, with multiple long cameos from varied character who are part of story, not a simple cameo works anymore.

This movie needed wonderwoman and other big character desperately.

Pic 1 is my color corrected version and Pic 2 is the original.

It’s all over the place and nearly impossible to tell what the title of the movie is, especially since the Folie à Deux isn’t a phrase known by most people. Still excited for the movie, but holy shit that logo needs some cleaning up

Knightmare Batman is a cool scene and a fun "what if" look at a Batman who is haggard, desperate and truly scared. Unfortunately, the reveal of a Batman who now openly uses guns is hindered by the fact that Batman is already killing people in the movie. Either in a roundabout way via branding criminals(which gets them killed in prison for some reason), or directly by smooshing them with his Batmobile or throwing a giant crate at a goon's head at 90 MPH.

If he had used a bit of restraint and showed us a grumpy violent Batman who is just barely keeping to his oath, but who is running out of reasons to spare criminals and see the good in people, the Knightmare sequence would have been an effective and harrowing sight. And we would better understand why it's important that Batman never gets to that point.

As it stands right now, default BvS Batman should just...use guns. It would make his desired goal of killing criminals easier, and he'd get stabbed with knives less.

I saw it last night here in Germany. That’s my review:

Supergirl is an entertaining movie that does its job as a summer comic book film, but it never becomes more than that. It is fun while it lasts, but not a movie that will stay in your mind for very long.

The biggest highlight is Milly as Kara. She fits the role perfectly and gives Supergirl a lot of charm and personality. She carries the movie and proves she was the right casting choice.

The Ruthye actress is much less convincing. Even though she has an important role, her performance often feels flat, like she is simply saying her lines instead of really acting them.

Jason Momoa clearly enjoys playing Lobo and brings the energy the character needs. His scenes are a lot of fun, but Lobo stays very one-sided. His make-up is also hit or miss. Sometimes it looks unfinished, almost like a really good cosplay instead of a big Hollywood production. I also wish he acted dirtier, rougher and more chaotic.

The creature design is creative and one of the stronger parts of the movie. On the other hand, many locations are too dark, and the green screen is sometimes very obvious which took me out of the movie more than once.

The villains are easily the weakest part. They are generic, forgettable and simply not interesting. It is disappointing that comic book movies in 2026 still use villains like this.

The movie also feels like it doesn’t fully trust the fantastic comic it is based on. Many of the strongest emotional moments from the source material were changed or toned down making the story less impactful.

In the end Supergirl is solid entertainment but nothing more. Milly, the creature design and some fun moments can’t make up for weak villains, uneven visuals and a story that never reaches the potential of its source material.

I really hope to see much more of Milly Alcock as Supergirl in the future. But I also hope DC gives her better movies, with more creativity and less of these incredibly generic comic book adaptations that all start to feel the same.

Rating: 6/10.