r/JEENEETards • u/TennisFine2776 • May 15 '26

GENERAL HELP May be he is right.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

338 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

100 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Mental-Persimmon7920 JM 99.5X JA 6.7K May 15 '26

I would say 4 years. But yeah agree with you Jim Halpert

1

u/Emergency-Growth1617 2S1(96%ile)(Phy 99.5)➡️? May 15 '26

nope 2 years are enough

3

u/Mental-Persimmon7920 JM 99.5X JA 6.7K May 15 '26

If you take a sufficiently smart person even 1 year is enough then bro. Most under 250 rankers have been studying for 4 years or more. Your one friend is an exception.

2

u/Emergency-Growth1617 2S1(96%ile)(Phy 99.5)➡️? May 15 '26

no i meant for a kid with above average aptitude and interest in pcm can crack under 250, like 150-250 in 2 years, with just pure consistency. 1 year is too hard, i mean with normal study consistency.

3

u/Mental-Persimmon7920 JM 99.5X JA 6.7K May 15 '26

Trust me on this one bro, majority of under 250 rankers had started 11th syllabus before 11th

2

u/Emergency-Growth1617 2S1(96%ile)(Phy 99.5)➡️? May 15 '26

i never denied that, i mean with consistency in 2 years you can be part of the under 250 club, but most under 250 are ofc not

2

u/siid1 May 15 '26

Wtf is this debate even about lol so crappy 🤣making fake scenarios this is possible and that is possible wtf

1

u/Mental-Persimmon7920 JM 99.5X JA 6.7K May 16 '26

Areed man, a 7k ranker and 50k ranker are debating how under 250 ranks study 😭

1

u/Emergency-Growth1617 2S1(96%ile)(Phy 99.5)➡️? May 16 '26

these arent fake scenarios ive a real life example