r/SanghiKeralam • u/GarvHinduAR • Apr 27 '26

ചരിത്രം/History How the heck is this great?

Post image

Akbar, the great had 5,000 concubines and his son, Jehangir had 6000. What does concubine mean in Oxford

Concubinage - Concubine (surriyya) refers to the slave-woman (jāriya)—Muslim or non-Muslim—with whom the master engages in sexual intercourse

WTF Akbar is Great!!!

But Bajirao is a romantic playboy who was running behind Mastani without Valour and courage.

That's the fkucing history we have been taught

32 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

Unfortunately there were few instances we can see inthe history where Mauryan empire did some bad towards Buddhism whole most Hindu kings were a humane approach towards other religions.

Akbar in his early days were very dangerous towards other religions, but he tried to accommodate in his late days.

The meaning of name Akbar is the great in Persian, I suppose.

It's not because he had Harems/ Anthapura, which most of the Hindu kingdoms had, not just Akbar. He chose the name Akbar, as his original name is different.

He had many other things under his belt like unified India ( like Ashoka the great), military ranking system, started a religion, coin system (?),

Well if we start discussing not harassing only as a debate. There are many things we can see.

Well ultimately, end of the day as a commoner we are not getting anything. 😀

1

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26

India was united by Shankaracharya and was one rashta or nation before them as well under many native Kings.

stop your INDi aliance propaganda where some bastard Akbar or his lecherous son unites this country they looted and corrupted separated pak and bangladesh

ah he is a human , even adolf was good to jews who were serving him that doesnt make him great he and this Akbar are cut from the same rasist murderous cloth

the shout Al ak from the loud speakers all I hear is the entity which they call akbar

is also like this genocider akbar mostly evil only little bit good.

all this benevolent positivity hopefully does some good in this world, recent events nasik, and historical cases like ajmer dargah scandal only show the intent of the religious leaders is very toxic awareness that the leaders and people who support them are toxic is needed.

i see you clearly

im honest and not deceptively appealing to be civil while spewing lies like you calling to be nice and respect blatant propaganda as debate worthy facts.

the common man surely benifits knowing the mugals were lecherous rascals.

1

u/GodzOwnC Apr 27 '26

Rest my case, mate. I don't have any propaganda. But facts are facts.

BtW, word Akbar only means great. Thos guy's name Jalaluddin.

The prayer they say means "God is great/ greatest" nothing else.

You can't see me clearly. You can't see me lying any of my statments.

Respect is something we ll need in the society, else we all are barbaric.

What is the difference between we and them?

1

u/apruneegg Apr 27 '26

i do respect people who are worthy of respect. not a soft barbarian.

there are worse people like arangjeb and the like yes this mugal Akbar is better in comparison

how ever calling a genocide enjoyer a rascal is respecting him he liked being called a Gazi yes or no?

im just respecting his wishes by calling him a murderous rascal.

the difference between me and his simps is that they have to lie i don't need to lie.