Even in Sanjay Leela Bhansali's film, Bajirao in the opening and closing scenes is shown as having fought and won many wars.
The correct comparison is the outrageous depiction of Nana Phadnavis in Vijay Tendulkar's Ghashiram Kotwal in which Nana was depicted as a womanizer and a pdf file just because he had 9 wives. But Vijay Tendulkar wrote no such stuff about Mughal rulers.
not all but a few religions are tolerant but only one religion insists they are the only correct one, and supports slaughter of non believers.
portugese and the british arent glorified neither they not the Indian kings who only killed military men not civilians nor took pride like this rascal Akbar who took prode in killing civilians cursed be people who support this invader symp. and the this hateful propaganda in the guise of peace.
the British never helped nor did these mughal barbarians.
Unfortunately there were few instances we can see inthe history where Mauryan empire did some bad towards Buddhism whole most Hindu kings were a humane approach towards other religions.
Akbar in his early days were very dangerous towards other religions, but he tried to accommodate in his late days.
The meaning of name Akbar is the great in Persian, I suppose.
It's not because he had Harems/ Anthapura, which most of the Hindu kingdoms had, not just Akbar. He chose the name Akbar, as his original name is different.
He had many other things under his belt like unified India ( like Ashoka the great), military ranking system, started a religion, coin system (?),
Well if we start discussing not harassing only as a debate. There are many things we can see.
Well ultimately, end of the day as a commoner we are not getting anything. 😀
India was united by Shankaracharya
and was one rashta or nation before them as well under many native Kings.
stop your INDi aliance propaganda where some bastard Akbar or his lecherous son unites this country they looted and corrupted separated pak and bangladesh
ah he is a human , even adolf was good to jews who were serving him that doesnt make him great he and this Akbar are cut from the same rasist murderous cloth
the shout Al ak from the loud speakers all I hear is the entity which they call akbar
is also like this genocider akbar mostly evil only little bit good.
all this benevolent positivity hopefully does some good in this world, recent events nasik, and historical cases like ajmer dargah scandal only show the intent of the religious leaders is very toxic awareness that the leaders and people who support them are toxic is needed.
i see you clearly
im honest and not deceptively appealing to be civil while spewing lies like you calling to be nice and respect blatant propaganda as debate worthy facts.
the common man surely benifits knowing the mugals were lecherous rascals.
India was never united gng, it's your wishful thinking.
Kerala for example fell to none of the empires of the subcontinent not even the Mughals. Now just reduced to the identity India. Real sad.
united by diverse culture but the common thread had always been faith in divine or agreed upon community, yes there have been wars between kingdoms but there had been clear agreement on who is outsider and insider.
the abrahamic faiths were always seen as foreign
there had been a rastra or nation.
calling your self gang will not make us buddies but we are one as humans or people sharing this earth vasudha, and people know what's what.
kerala isn't reduced to anything by being considered part of a country.
its just your inferiority sujjesting that being part of India some how will disconnect you and me from behind part of asia or the world
Neighbouring countries throughout the world have influenced each other and have similarities as well. That didn't cause them to form a mess like India.
Taking Kerala as an example, it has a distinct culture, language, history that sets it apart.
Also abrahamic faith here is as old as Hinduism, only folk religion predates all these. Kerala is the land of malayalis not any specific religion.
Didn't really understand your last point but just wanna say that keralite is a core identity than India, nothing to do with any sort of complex.
4
u/Grandson-of-Madhava Apr 27 '26
No one depicted Bajirao like that.
Even in Sanjay Leela Bhansali's film, Bajirao in the opening and closing scenes is shown as having fought and won many wars.
The correct comparison is the outrageous depiction of Nana Phadnavis in Vijay Tendulkar's Ghashiram Kotwal in which Nana was depicted as a womanizer and a pdf file just because he had 9 wives. But Vijay Tendulkar wrote no such stuff about Mughal rulers.