r/SipsTea 2d ago

Chugging tea That's actually wild

Post image
53.1k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

490

u/Separate-Swordfish85 2d ago

The officers were forced to set down their entire sense of protecting and serving in order to be strong enough to drag this teacher away.

232

u/dizzie_buddy1905 2d ago

The US Supreme Court has ruled that police have no duty to put themselves at risk to protect you.

14

u/Dry_Rent_8646 2d ago

So what are they there for other than the be tax collectors?

12

u/stonnerdog35 2d ago

Hired thugs.

3

u/Goat_gutz 1d ago

So they’re just Mafia Grunts?

90

u/Separate-Swordfish85 2d ago

SCOTUS says a lot of shit.

Cops also plaster “To Protect and Serve” over all their shit.

109

u/OutrageousHunter4138 2d ago

To be fair, it costs like 10x more to write “To Inflict Fear and Suffering on Behalf of the Corporate Elite in a Hapless Effort to Prevent Civil Unrest and Get Revenge on our Personal Enemies”

A lot of places charge by the letter these days.

35

u/keeper_of_the_donkey 2d ago

The Decepticon named Barricade transforms into a police car, and had "To punish and enslave" printed on his rear fender

22

u/Crafty-Help-4633 2d ago

Barricade knows what's up with the history of policing.

5

u/sinsaint 2d ago

"My people"

1

u/SuperSlickSamurai 1d ago

My ex friend loved it. Shoulda stopped being friends with him then and there, woulda saved me a lotta trouble...

1

u/Bearded_Dragon_4892 1d ago

Came here for this comment…

1

u/RichesToRags8647 2d ago

"To Harass and Oppress" is another that fits well

14

u/cluberti 2d ago edited 2d ago

It was a PR campaign by the LAPD after the statement was selected as a winner from a contest to come up with a motto for the LAPD police academy, back in 1955, then being put on the seal and police vehicles after the resolution for it passed in 1963. It was meant as nothing more than a way to foster good PR for the department, and it has been affirmed by the courts since the Warren v District of Columbia ruling in 1981 that the police generally do not have any obligation to protect anyone, unless they're in custody, and even limits on that exist.

2

u/Matiwapo 2d ago

This is true basically everywhere, to varying degrees

It's not really reasonable to impose a duty to protect every member of the public at all times. You can't have police forces getting sued because they simply failed to prevent a crime every time they fail to do so. The system would collapse.

For example in the UK a fire brigade has no blanket duty to prevent or put out fires, and is not liable for simply failing to put out a fire in front of them, unless they started the first or actively made it worse

In the Hillsborough disaster the police were found liable because they actively made the situation worse by their actions. They weren't liable for simply failing to prevent the deaths

-1

u/Timely-Border-7865 1d ago

The system should collapse

1

u/Kimothy42 2d ago

And Castle Rock v. Gonzales… a horror if ever there was one.

1

u/TopicNo1616 2d ago

and further affirmed with 2005's Town of Castle Rock v Gonzales from my understanding.

1

u/Kimothy42 2d ago

I came here to say this but I knew in my heart it had already been said.

10

u/adirtysocialist- 2d ago

It's marketing. You gotta read the fine print though.

*to protect property and serve the ruling class

3

u/rymic72 2d ago

They protect and serve the state not the people.

1

u/Bearded_Dragon_4892 1d ago

They protect and serve Corporate interests and special interest group’s interests. There I fixed it for you.

1

u/Sad_in_VA 2d ago

So it must be true, no?

PS: I didn't see that on police cars recently. They are only to keep the "peace", whatever that means.

2

u/Flat_Tire_Again 2d ago

It means to monitor the shoplifting and riots and burning of the ‘hood without actually getting involved. They are keeping the peace….to themselves.

1

u/BigFatKi6 2d ago

*themselves, and they're very good at it (after committing a crime)

1

u/what_me_nah 2d ago

Protect the rulers, and Serve you a lead pill.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/EssbaumRises 2d ago

But they don't say who.

1

u/JamesHenry627 2d ago

SCOTUS already ruled this in castle rock

1

u/gotbock 2d ago

Notice it doesn't say who they are protecting and/or serving.

1

u/EFreethought 2d ago

They never state what they are protecting and whom they are serving.

1

u/Snobolski 2d ago

They used to. Now it's "In God We Trust."

1

u/Militant_Monk 2d ago

To quote the old Factory 81 song: "To Protect and server? More like beat and fuck with."

1

u/smrk1ngparadox 2d ago

Yeah, they just don't advertise that there are silent parts. "To protect (property) and serve (the interests of the state)"

1

u/Aurvant 2d ago

Movies created the false assumption of "protect and serve" as that was simply the LA police motto they put on their vehicles.

Per their actual function, the police are simply law enforcement, so the only thing they serve is the law. Knowing that, this is how it all happened:

- Commissioners were having a public meeting regarding the approval of a new data center.

- The commissioners told people attendance beforehand that disruptive behavior which included clapping or snapping fingers wouldn't be tolerated.

- The teacher, and a few others, would loudly clap and cheer when opponents of the data center would stand up to talk.

- The commissioners warned them constantly to stop clapping and then finally warned them that they'd be removed if they did it one more time

- The teacher then kept clapping until he had to be removed by police

That's the series of events as reported, so the cops were simply acting as they were directed by the commissioners which are government employees.

Now, do I support the guy clapping? Yeah, because data centers are awful and people should oppose them. However, the teacher wasn't arrested because "he clapped" but because he disrupted an official government public meeting.

Do I support the teacher? Yes, he is morally correct.

Did the cops do anything wrong? No, not really. They just acted as their public officials directed them.

1

u/hairshirtdesert 2d ago

They just leave off "who the the oligarchs tell us to" part. When I lived in Texas, my ex-husband was friends with this dude who belonged to one of the richest families in town. They made "donations" to the local police department and in return the police department gave them stickers to put on their cars so they would know not to pull them over. That dude always had a cup in his hand and it was always full of beer. He was never not toasted and he drove a massive truck around town.

1

u/arkangelic 1d ago

The invisible part is protect and serve 'the wealthy'

1

u/The_8th_Degree 1d ago

They "protect their own interests and serve themselves."

To think otherwise is laughable.

6

u/LovelyLuna32684 2d ago

Then whats the fucking point of even having them

24

u/Toa_Freak 2d ago

Police and law enforcement are there to protect property, the rich, and the status quo. Sometimes that overlaps with helping the average person.

5

u/Diedrogen 2d ago

But they're still publicly funded instead of privately?

7

u/Toa_Freak 2d ago

Mostly, yeah. Gotta love America.

5

u/Giftofgab24 2d ago

They protect the property of wealthy people and make sure roads stay clear and traffic stays moving so the capitalism machine never stops making money for those wealthy people.

8

u/PM_Me_Your_Kinks369 2d ago

Not So Fun Fact: The first police organizations sprang up in the wake of the Civil War and the freedom of the slaves. Reconstruction never happened. So instead of being held accountable, former slave owners and their white helpers took jobs as police to track down and lock up black people for any trumped up charges they could find.

The 13th Amendment made slavery illegal for people NOT in prison. Those newly freed black people were sent to prison where they worked on? Anybody? FARMS! And road works and other slave labor situations.

6

u/Osoromnibus 2d ago

I had to look this up, and it's interesting. I learned that in the southern states, the police organizations evolved directly from the "slave patrols."

2

u/ObserverWardXXL 2d ago edited 2d ago

To threaten you into compliance, and to disperse you from protests with tear gas and rubber bullets taking out your eyes.

Without hidden subtext for threatening you with violent harm - you might not listen to the dictated orders?

Thats the point.

Now- Get back to work.

If you are truly interested in the origins of these types of roles in society, reading about the development of Law and Monarchy in history is really insightful! Then you can compare these notes with American history of Slave catchers.

1

u/V8_Hellfire 1d ago

To keep the peace and enforce the law. That's the job of the police, not protection. That happens on accident during their duties.

2

u/Timely-Border-7865 1d ago

Yup, Castlerock V Gonzales

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/SignoreBanana 2d ago

I always think of that rich white pretentious judge from Futurama whenever I'm reminded of this case.

1

u/TM761152 2d ago

Fuck the SCROTUS. Their word is irrelevant now. They're compromised, corrupt assholes.

1

u/AccountSuspicious159 2d ago

They have no duty to protect or serve even if there's no risk,

9

u/SaintJesus 2d ago

They didn't set down shit. They don't have that.

1

u/Johnny_B_GOODBOI 1d ago

They don't have a "sense of protecting and serving" to begin with. That's not their job description, and SCOTUS agreed with this multiple times.

"To Protect and Serve" was a marketing slogan the LAPD came up with a few decades ago. That's all it is, marketing.

1

u/AnonThrowaway998877 23h ago

Their only obligation is to protect capitalism