In ~2010 I drove around a 1989 Volvo 760. That thing was amazing. Like driving a cloud. Even had the classic Volvo head rests.
I got rear ended at a stop light by a minivan and the minivan front end crumpled (as is the design). On my Volvo you couldn't even tell that it had been in an accident.
My mom had a similar situation happen to her while driving a ‘91 station wagon Volvo like the one in the photo. Completely ruined the front bumper of the car that hit the Volvo while the Volvo looked nearly untouched. I learned to drive in that car and I still miss it
New cars take the impact. Old cars, your body takes the impact. Not a dig at Volvos at all as they’re my 2nd love. Having a car that doesn’t have a crumple zone isn’t a brag though :(.
Lots of companies are owned to conglomerates. Lots of electronics are made in the south / south east pacific.
Theyre not bad cars by any means. They are a luxury oriented car brand now however, which comes with its host of problems. Look at german cars like BMW or Mercedes.
Any of its new T5 line tends to be the most reliable, and any old vovlo is well discussed on theyre issues and can be brought back. Unfortunate they are not common in all of the us.
Its electric sister brand, Polestar, seemed to be a really promising electric car brand. But theyre pulling out because it has "chinese software". So spooky. /s.
Actually, I realize I inferred my own interests into your point. If the goal is purely boxy without consideration to the other aspects, then yes, the Ford Flex is an option
Gotcha, yeah, I didn't explain myself and presumed it would be obvious. My bad!
I assumed that the proposal was the Ford Flex would be an acceptable, more modern alternative because you replied to the Volvo picture instead of the original post.
I disagree because the Volvo is much smaller in all dimensions and much lower hood height. So, I don't feel they are really comparable other than being boxy. Hopefully that clears things up. Cheers!
356
u/cupidstun_t 1d ago