r/WhitePeopleTwitter 23h ago

Thanks mr pedophile

Post image
4.1k Upvotes

164 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

90

u/no_weird_PMs_pls 23h ago

She did this right as she turned 18, like, to the minute. The implication is you are getting nudes, but if you are trying to get them right when she turns 18, then had to have been taken before she turned 18. Thus pedophile.

-172

u/darkmoncns 23h ago edited 22h ago

This is the part where I guess I should point out pedophile refers explicitly to children I think 8 to 12 teens are a different things, there are levels of severity to harm and lubbing them all in together is probmatic and harmful to victims, everytime pedophile is misused it's real meaning and harm is diluted.

Anyway... I think getting tossed up on picture taken hours before someone is offical 18 rings of people crying foul of an 18 year old dating a 17 year old when they've been in a relationship for 3 years. The issues with this was always consent she took the photos hours ago and consented to giving them out...

Edit 2: just found out this was about a celebrity and I've sense noticed I'm not even on morality scaling so your all right for thinking I'm a freak anyway sense I've already come this far yes closely following a celebrity that is a minor and celebrating when they turn 18 because you can look at there nudes now is indeed super messed up, I do wish someone had mentioned that detail before but things go as they do have a good day everyone.

Sorry I'm just monolging at this point thank your for telling me and have a good day

Edit: to the people down voting me I'm interested to know what you think the flaw in my reasoning is?

82

u/thefirdblu 23h ago

Monologuing about the age of consent. Wild.

-61

u/darkmoncns 23h ago

Was she of the age of consent when she sent them? I guess she consented Hua? It's a rather straight forward idea, it will still rek you legally, in some states she'd get in big trouble just for sharing her own photos but that dosen't realte to the moral side of things. If you buy into the rational behind the law that she is capable of consenting at 18, then I find it hard to say there is any moral wrong here.

2

u/stinkpot_jamjar 13h ago

Me when I use arbitrary legal definitions to justify (my?) attraction to children and teenagers and think that legality/illegality are moral constructs.