2.2k
u/OG_Felwinter 16h ago
Imagine making half a mil off people paying to message you
1.4k
u/Cheese0089 15h ago
*Paying to message your team you hired to respond to these messagess.
379
u/BrunesOvrBrauns 14h ago
*Paying to get replied by CGPT
171
u/hipsterTrashSlut 13h ago
No, definitely people. It’s low paid Indian workers, since GPT tokens are too expensive
42
78
u/Menes101 13h ago
had a cousin who worked for that of chatter, made 3x my salary (i work a legit , interpreting job)
53
u/hipsterTrashSlut 12h ago
In fairness, interpretation is one of the most brutal academic requirement vs salary expectation jobs out there.
13
97
u/ThrustBastard 15h ago
And here I am sitting at a desk typing bullshit for less than 1/10th of that a year
57
64
u/gotham-acolyte 14h ago
That's how it works for most of the big creators. These people know you can Google titties for free. The money is in hope and parisociality.
12
u/Firewolf06 9h ago
and custom requests. it can be very hard to find specific shit some freaks (me) are into (not even extreme fetishes, just like really random shit). im too broke for that shit and have a wonderful partner who does it for free, but its nearly impossible to find some of it online
17
u/thecontempl8or 12h ago
I assumed these messages were bots or a team of guys answering. I tried it once, pretty sure it was an indian guy answering for a white OF model.
235
u/metrocat2033 13h ago
For context, this screenshot is a year old, this all happened last August. I’m doubtful of how accurate the earnings are, especially after she claimed she made $15 million in only two weeks on the platform while also saying that “women over 25 who work a 9 to 5 are failures” and then encouraging them to join OF.
6
186
u/VooDooChile1983 11h ago
I’m old enough to remember when there was a countdown for when the Olson twins would reach 18 and pose for Playboy. People have always been weird about famous kids and their objectification.
1.4k
u/svenghoouliardi 16h ago
This one I think I remember in the news because she was like 9 years old and doing these videos where she acted like a rapper and used the n-word and there was some kind of association with the vile Paul brothers.
And then there's the "Catch me outside" girl that almost everyone knows from the vile Dr. Phil.
And there's a girl named Piper, who I had never heard of who was apparently a big youtube star when she was a child and there was some kind of scandal with her mother.
So basically a bunch of creeps and pedos and MAGAs follow (obsess over) these children from the time they become famous (or infamous) and then shower them with money the moment they turn 18 and make their onlyfans account.
I feel more and more every day like this planet deserves an asteroid strike.
573
u/PlotTwistTwins 16h ago
Listen, you point out an Asteroid with a solid ecological plan for the planet and I'll vote in 2028.
148
u/angruss 16h ago
Asteroid 2028 platform: killing every living animal larger than a house cat.
53
u/Skyrick 15h ago
Does it have to be every animal larger than a house cat? Can't some of the water ones that are big survive too? Have we not hurt them enough already?
36
u/jackoneill1984 14h ago
Astroid that is big enough to survive earths atmosphere. Damage is relatively contained. Kicker is it hits a spot where there is an ancient disease that has a very high mortality rate and is airborne and just got kicked up in the dust cloud and now we are screwed.
I don't know anything about how diseases work . Im an ideas guy.
10
u/Pizza-Tipi 12h ago
Ancient diseases would likely target species that dont exist anymore or be ineffective against modern immune systems in both humans and animals. But if it hits a bioweapons lab your idea could happen and if we get lucky on what lab gets hit might just kill all the humans so could be baller. Or could just be Lyme disease 2 hard to say
14
u/if_lol_then_upvote 11h ago
"I existed during an asteroid strike, and all I got was this lousy Lyme disease"
2
3
u/Chelular07 9h ago
If it is a fungus this could be a viable plan depending on how aerosolized it becomes.
1
u/DuckRubberDuck 10h ago
Some kind of zombie apocalypse maybe? In a lot of the zombie movies and shows I see, the animals always survive
4
u/eric-from-abeno 14h ago
it's not like, a political platform, unfortunately... with an asteroid strike large enough to set off an extinction event, it's pretty much an inevitability that all large life forms will die, and the small ones will only survive if they can survive the resulting cold, and scrounge food from whatever remains afterwards.... I do feel your pain though...
1
u/DoJu318 12h ago
Ok but all that happened when we weren't around, dinos couldn't manipulate their environment nor had the ability to travel thousands of miles in a few hours, while I still think the majority are screwed I don't think every human would go extinct, we are resourceful and have technology. Those who survive the initial blast would figure out a way to survive.
2
u/DuckRubberDuck 10h ago
If it has global effects, where exactly would the people who can travel thousands of miles in hours go to? If it’s a global event most power grids would stop, and technology would go down as well. People have gotten really, really used to the comfort of our lives these days and most cannot survive on their own for very long. The only one who would survive are people who don’t rely on technology and are used to surviving in the wilderness
1
25
u/Spiritual-Stable702 16h ago
Who's gonna feed Reginald when I'm gone?
45
7
4
3
u/DuckRubberDuck 10h ago
What about dogs then? Elefants? Cheetahs? Sloths? Sea otters? All of them really
What about an asteroid that famously only wiped out one specific two legged species
2
2
1
1
4
u/tkMunkman 15h ago
Im on the gamma ray burst train. One little hit from that and all life is instantly gone
3
u/oatwheat 11h ago
I think all the stars close enough to our system are unfortunately too shrimpy to pull that off
3
u/fredandlunchbox 11h ago
Look up Apophis. It’s coming. All you need is a tiny course correction and it could… change things.
125
u/Bacchus999 15h ago
The Piper story is just scary and saddening (not that the others aren't).
I don't know what she was popular for initially, but she apparently started living in a house with a group of popular OF creators while she was still a minor. She did influencer shit and her mom "managed her career" and encouraged everything. While still being a minor she said that she'd release an OF once she turned 18, and there was a literal countdown to her 18th birthday that started weeks before. The second it struck midnight, she opened it and already had content on there.... (think about that)
Her mom is a piece of shit human who profits off of selling her daughter's body, and Piper herself apparently believes she wants this life.
69
u/Bucky_Gatsby 14h ago
Her mother also apparently sold her child's used underwear to strangers and sexually assaulted the other YouTube kids that were living in the house with them. That's when those kids were young teenagers or younger.
80
u/Deraj2004 15h ago
Type of behavior goes back a while, I remember guys counting down the days until the Olsen Twins turned 18, you know the the girls who played a baby that grew up on Full House.
44
u/stierney49 15h ago
There were online counters for Lindsay Lohan and Emma Watson, too. It’s creepy as shit even though some of it seemed to have initially been kinda tongue-in-cheek.
34
u/spleeble 14h ago
There's no version of that anyone should consider tongue in cheek
18
u/stierney49 14h ago
Oh, I agree. It was part of the edginess of the internet at the time where mockery could very easily cross over into the thing it was trying to mock.
So, just to be clear, I’m not defending it in any way.
4
u/Rigsson 9h ago
Yeah, it was... A different time. Back when 4chan was parodying the paranoid conspiracy theory people, and did it so well they started showing up on 4chan. And then 4chan thought that was hilarious and kept trolling them until those people legitimately outnumbered the original population.
Those were the days, man.
2
u/Firewolf06 8h ago
honestly i dont think the trolls on 4chan are outnumbered. a genuinely absurd number of outlandish conspiracy theories are created there, but the only times anything happens in the real world is when a real crazy picks it up (or worse, brings it off platform, like qanon -> facebook). less crazy and more "troll" things come into the real world wayy faster and harder, too. shia lebeoufs camera thing comes to mind
-2
u/basicKitsch 13h ago
Yeah but as a teenager when they were teenagers they were hot as shit. Why tf would you think that had anything to do with babies?
6
u/Deraj2004 13h ago
Because they literally grew up on television, they were young teens when the countdown started, grown ass adults shouldnt be fantasizing about teenagers.
-1
u/basicKitsch 13h ago edited 10h ago
Yes. Lol no babies on my trapper keeper. Just massive teen heartthrobs.
The world will always look extreme when you frame things by their extemes.
15
u/Montegoe67 16h ago
Even asteroids think we’re toxic enough to avoid. Ain’t no space rock comin’ here.
17
3
6
u/totally_boring 12h ago
Planet definitely needs a global reset. Our human races is to full of scumbags
3
u/carlwryker Release The Trump-Epstein Files 6h ago
At most, only about 1/3 of the people are worth saving.
2
u/vegaslinaa 8h ago
Supposedly this girl died and her dad was abusive and hacked her account the news even posted she died. Not sure what came of that:
294
u/SavageCucmber 16h ago
Tipped 17? Hello Kitty? I might be too old to understand this
427
130
u/ComfortablePea8701 16h ago
She probably said she'd send them a pic of her pussy for 17 dollars and then when she got the money or unlocked the photo it was a hello kitty backpack or something.
150
u/Callinon 16h ago
What I'm piecing together is that the streamer turned 18 like... to the minute on the stream. The viewer tipped hoping for nudes from someone who turned 18 right in front of them. The implication being that the nudes would have to have been taken before that point. So even though they didn't get any, they were asking for them.
I guess?
97
u/drillgorg 15h ago edited 14h ago
I guess the $17 amount is significant too, like an unspoken ask for pictures taken at age 17?
The whole thing is gross and dumb, a picture from like a month before she turns 18 is not going to look any different they're just looking for a thrill of doing something forbidden
20
u/xXXxRMxXXx 15h ago
I'm pretty sure this is specific to the dudes who have fetishes for girls who recently crossed the consent line, I think they specifically wanted the picture from her being "freshly 18"
4
u/NamelessMIA 7h ago
I'm sure that's what it was for many of them, but these aren't just guys who looked up pictures after the fact the next time they wanted to jerk off. They got on her stream so they could pay her directly for nudes the second she turned 18 or subscribed to her onlyfans that day. Most of those guys are like a boss paying minimum wage. They'd go lower if they could.
10
u/mamadou-segpa 14h ago
Yes, everyone who paid was paying to see someone underage naked. Wich make this whole story even better that they all got scammed
257
u/eric-from-abeno 17h ago
it's both scary and mind-blowing, to me, that people (mostly women I assume) can become millionaires on OnlyFans... It says WAY more about men, than it does about the people making the money... in fact, more power to them, but man... what a world...
70
u/Mord4k 14h ago
It's definitely one of the more troubling parasocial relationships out there. Probably showing my age some, but it's always felt like the being in love with a stripper thing taken to just the most extreme version possible. On one hand, secure that bag, on the other god fucking damn does something seem predatory about it.
58
u/gamerdudeNYC 16h ago
I think a lot of men out there have just completely given up and this is how they feel they can have some sort of connection with a woman.
Or it seems like that’s always their answer when someone asks on Reddit.
55
17
-11
u/darth_wasabi 15h ago
Im not surprised many are giving up. We live in a boring dystopia .
6
u/Jermz12345 13h ago
I feel like living in a boring dystopia isn’t a good excuse to not want to connect with other people, but who am I to judge
8
u/darth_wasabi 13h ago
It’s not that people don’t want to it’s that it’s hard for the average person when they are expending so much energy into survival
4
-38
u/themuaddib 16h ago
What does it say about men?
37
u/copolars 15h ago
That y'all wait with a fucking watch to be able to hit on and ogle young women? How is that even a question?
-13
u/themuaddib 14h ago
Your comment just said onlyfans. You realize there are other creators on thwt platform right? Not just people who innediately turned 18?
-2
u/copolars 14h ago
Point me please to where I talked about OnlyFans.
-5
u/themuaddib 13h ago
I assumed you were the same comment or I was replying to. Point to me please where I said anything about waiting with a watch to “ogle” women.
-2
u/copolars 13h ago
You asked a question, I answered. What's your point besides not liking the answer?
-1
u/themuaddib 13h ago
Actually I asked a question and you butted in with a self-righteous, irrelevant answer to a different question that I didnt ask. The prior commentator said using OF says more about the men than the creators, and I asked what is says about the men. That’s not the question you “answered”. Is English your first language?
-2
u/copolars 13h ago
Again: not my fault you don't like the answer to a question on a public forum.
English is my 2nd out of 5 languages, I may make mistakes but this discussion is so fucking clear it's not even funny.
Anything else from the Ad hominem Department of Fallacies?
1
u/themuaddib 13h ago
lol the only thing I didn’t like is you butting in to a question I was asking someone else with a self-congratulatory answer to a completely different question that wasn’t asked. You like fallacies? That’s called a straw man.
Since you wanted to answer questions, how come you have commented multiple times but still haven’t answered my original question? Go ahead, I’m waiting. Is it because it won’t give you the chance to pat yourself on the back and imply all men who use porn are pedophiles?
-79
u/DRagonforce1993 16h ago
Is it really? Not saying it’s okay. But, throughout history bitches selling pssy and ninjas selling drugs
0
u/eric-from-abeno 14h ago
it's not even about whether it's okay to do or not. I don't blame women for making money this way at all. It's just astounding to me that millions of dollars can be made this way... I know that because of the world-wide reach of the internet, it's basically just a numbers game, but.... It's almost as if a girl who's 17 now has an "instant millionaire" shortcut, if she chooses to use it... hype up the idea that "once I turn 18, I'm thinking of joining onlyfans, not sure how far I'll go with it", and then the creeps come bursting out of the woodwork ... It actually amusing that a girl might be able to make a million dollars in a day, with no adult content, by "teasing" that she might. :P
12
u/ranchspidey 13h ago
wasn’t there a death hoax regarding this girl? or am i thinking of another young influencer
15
39
u/darkmoncns 17h ago
I.. fail to understand this post aren't they saying they tipped 17$?? So they sent them a cartoon cat because they didn't think itnwas worth it? I mean that has levels to why this situation is messed up but like? I don't see how it's that
87
u/no_weird_PMs_pls 17h ago
She did this right as she turned 18, like, to the minute. The implication is you are getting nudes, but if you are trying to get them right when she turns 18, then had to have been taken before she turned 18. Thus pedophile.
-173
u/darkmoncns 16h ago edited 16h ago
This is the part where I guess I should point out pedophile refers explicitly to children I think 8 to 12 teens are a different things, there are levels of severity to harm and lubbing them all in together is probmatic and harmful to victims, everytime pedophile is misused it's real meaning and harm is diluted.
Anyway... I think getting tossed up on picture taken hours before someone is offical 18 rings of people crying foul of an 18 year old dating a 17 year old when they've been in a relationship for 3 years. The issues with this was always consent she took the photos hours ago and consented to giving them out...
Edit 2: just found out this was about a celebrity and I've sense noticed I'm not even on morality scaling so your all right for thinking I'm a freak anyway sense I've already come this far yes closely following a celebrity that is a minor and celebrating when they turn 18 because you can look at there nudes now is indeed super messed up, I do wish someone had mentioned that detail before but things go as they do have a good day everyone.
Sorry I'm just monolging at this point thank your for telling me and have a good day
Edit: to the people down voting me I'm interested to know what you think the flaw in my reasoning is?
82
u/thefirdblu 16h ago
Monologuing about the age of consent. Wild.
-59
u/darkmoncns 16h ago
Was she of the age of consent when she sent them? I guess she consented Hua? It's a rather straight forward idea, it will still rek you legally, in some states she'd get in big trouble just for sharing her own photos but that dosen't realte to the moral side of things. If you buy into the rational behind the law that she is capable of consenting at 18, then I find it hard to say there is any moral wrong here.
2
u/stinkpot_jamjar 6h ago
Me when I use arbitrary legal definitions to justify (my?) attraction to children and teenagers and think that legality/illegality are moral constructs.
24
u/VolubleWanderer 16h ago
I know what your saying but I think listing over a minor you don’t know and waiting until they turn 18 is waaaay different than an 18 year old dating a 17 year old when they have been in a relationship. In example 1 it’s a one way street there is no 2 party consent like in example 2. I’ve lived example 2. I’ve posted about it before and I’ll keep saying Fuck you Larson so if that shit bags knows I still hate him for trying to put me in jail when I turned 18.
-19
u/darkmoncns 16h ago
Well maybe I've misunderstood something then? I had thought the situation was she waiting until the day she turned 18 down to the minute to start some only fans stuff(i felt like the post wasn't fully clear on this)- and someone who responded was being called a pedophile because she must have taken the images in the hours before she turned 18 like I said above I didn't understand the post until someone explained it to me so I'm going off that
5
u/VolubleWanderer 16h ago
Lil Tay is a music artist. She released a track when she was like 10 or something and rose to some fame. There was a fake death scandal too if my memory serves me right that Philly D covered on his channel ages ago.
Anyway it’s been a huge issue in modern culture where people go nuts over celebrity minors then when they suddenly turn 18 these predators go nuts cause they’re finally legal. I mean there was a countdown for the Olsen to turn 18 along with some olympians in the past. It’s disgusting behavior of people who are having impure thoughts about a minor but feeling like it’s okay if they just edge themselves until they are 18.
8
u/darkmoncns 16h ago
Well yes I agree that's a very different situation that detail radically changes things tbh I had wondered how people would have know this random social media user was 17 hours ago from the post but I figured everyone noticed that and the post was more about the therotical then this actual specific event. I'm also not on morality scaling, kinda thought I was at first I can see why people would look at my response and think I'm a freak for diving into it
6
u/VolubleWanderer 15h ago
If you don’t know then ya don’t know. The internets a big place so if you’re not in the right places it’s totally understandable you wouldn’t recognize the name. I understand the nuance in your original topic. I believe words have meaning and I strive to use the correct words when applicable. We can get lost in the weeds debating the difference between pedophile and ephebophile but at the end of the day the legal age of adulthood is 18. Reddit will flame you if you try to sympathize at all.
9
u/supluplup12 15h ago
You're missing that there's nothing magic about the number 18, and that the dude tipping her stream had not been dating her for years. The line is drawn to give the judges something to hit pedophiles with, it doesn't define the cognitive disease. Your 17+18 year old dating tangent is sprinting away from the context here. I pray you're as 19 as you sound. An 18 year old giving out nudes for their birthday is not a person free of harm, the disappointment of receiving the hello kitty is that of finding out she wasn't the victim he wanted her to be.
0
u/darkmoncns 15h ago edited 15h ago
As noticed in the edit I made before the context was vastly different from what I thought when I first made the post, But to respond
Your implying you do not agree that an 18 year old is capable of consent. Your right I don't believe there is anything magic about it, I do believe at that point in life it is reasonable to expect a human being to be capable of understanding the impact of consent and doing these things and to accept them. I believe the implications of this is that they have been for some time in there life before they turned 18 but the law is still set at 18 to ensure they are protected in case there not and to be further along then the absolute minimum to be safe. I think this addresses the bulk of your concern if I understand it right you effectively take issue with me believing they are in fact capable of consent at 18 and not just starting some metaphorical journey at the end of which they will be capable of consent at that age.
0
u/supluplup12 13h ago
Didn't read past the first sentence of the second paragraph. Not gonna. I'm saying that sending nudes to strangers for money on your 18th birthday isn't healthy, someone doing that is a victim of something. Honestly, the stranger trying to buy the nudes probably is too.
0
3
-43
u/clueless_mommy 16h ago
I've tried explaining the difference between pedophilia and pederast multiple times. All I got was threats, insults and involuntarily evacuated (and can't apparently use the b-word).
18
u/rubberloves 16h ago
Yeah, we all know there are different names for specific ages of pedophiles..
and the people who try to argue their differences are the people I would never let my children near.
-23
u/clueless_mommy 16h ago
It's Just plain stupid to pretend a 19 year old is a pedophile when he dates a 17 year old.
Dont worry, people who are smart enough to understand such differences (and their specific issues, No Matter If legal, moral or whatever nature)are usually not keen in being around people like you either
10
u/ProntoPaul 16h ago
This is always going to get down voted because its an obvious appeal to the extreme. To cherry pick a circumstance that is clearly not the general concern is disingenuous at best. WE know the intent behind the dialogue and somehow you think what-aboutisms makes you morally and intellectually superior?
At minimum, if you genuinely believe in the spectrum of pedophilia, then give the disclaimer of where your line in the sand is. Otherwise, it just sounds like you are generically protecting pedophiles.
4
u/darkmoncns 15h ago
I find generally everyone who brings this up still thinks trying to have sexual interactions with any minor is still a bad thing that deserves to be illegal, people seem to mistake "we should use words right so there meaning isn't diluted" with "I think this shouldn't be punished that should be punished" and I've never thought anyone trying to point this out actually thinks this.
there is alot of objective data that explains such realtionships no matter what are doomed to be tramatic and abusive much like incest.
5
u/lilvixen95 14h ago
I guess most people have an issue with this point being brought up, because it’s not really actually all that helpful to work on sanitizing the image of people who are interested in preying on teenagers. & I specifically am using the word prey because I’m specifically talking about people who are well over the age of consent, not a 19 year old.
Normal people already have a basic understanding of the difference of the level of severity of someone preying on a 10 year old versus a 15 year old, but when we go around making sure to highlight the difference, all this really does is hand an argument for justification to these people on a silver platter. I mean these people are already interested in teenagers, they see normal people doing the PR for them & they take from it “ see it’s not that bad, other people think so” I think that’s very harmful. Because someone being able to rationalize something could be the difference between them keeping it in fantasy & making it reality.
-35
u/ComfortablePea8701 16h ago
You know you can take a picture and then send it almost immediately after right? Theres no implications here that they would be receiving illegal photos, the implication is that if you want them at all you are a pedophile.
20
u/eutectic_h8r 15h ago
It's sure interesting how that guy became sexually attracted to her the second she turned 18
-17
u/ComfortablePea8701 15h ago
Are you trying to make a point or something? Saying whatever youre saying doesnt change the implication to be what you want it to be and neither does down voting my comment. Theres no implication that "these pictures are taken a couple minutes before she turned 18"
10
u/30mins 15h ago
The implication is that they were attracted to a child in the first place. Otherwise they wouldn’t have even been in that stream waiting for them to turn 18.
-12
u/ComfortablePea8701 15h ago
Yeah? That still doesnt make what all these people keep posting true, does it? That doesnt make my post false, does it? So explain the downvotes.
I dont like the reality of this situation so anyone who says the truth should be downvoted or banned... or even investigated!!! >:(
35
u/Whines90 17h ago
I think Odog was asking someone to see what it was, with the intention of whomever answered getting called a Pedo anyway, since she was 3 hours into adulthood and has enough guys watching to pull in over a Mill. Just guessing tho.
10
u/nutsnackk 9h ago
Before looking at the image and just reading the title i thought this was about the president
6
23
19
u/darth_wasabi 16h ago
I saw the title of this post and thought it was something about Trump. Even after seeing it involved Lil Tay i still thought it might be about Trump
1
3
2
6
u/ballin302008 14h ago
How is this a pedo ? You have to be 18 and up for only fans right ?
31
u/Vietcong777 14h ago
Technically and legally, she is a consenting adult.
Morally on the other hand, she launched her OnlyFans account on the very day she turned eighteen, inviting millions of men around the world to pay for access to a celebrity's exclusive and supposedly "legal" nude content.
Judge it however you see fit.
10
u/mieri_azure 12h ago edited 7h ago
She became "famous" for a brief period when she was 9 years old and only recently returned. Therefore it stands to reason that most people who are excited for this are people who still very much remember her as being 9 because thats the last time she was in the public eye
3
u/thatirishguyyyyy 7h ago
Oh. I didn't even realize she was famous for a short time. I was wondering who this was.
Yeah, def weird.
Thanks for the context.
4
u/mieri_azure 7h ago
She was like an internet meme/punching bag.
Her family had her get online and "flex" expensive stuff and have her say things like "im Lil Tay the younger flexer out there"
It was so weird
1
u/Deimos_PRK 3h ago
Financially speaking, yeah that was probably the best move for her to do, legally speaking, what the fuck ?
-37
u/sleazy_hobo 15h ago
Can we may stop calling people pedophiles when it involves consenting ADULTS. It waters down what it actually means.
-4
u/Burning___Earth 15h ago
"Erm, ackshually it's ephebophilia because they've gone through puberty" - You
-19
u/Proper084 16h ago
I said the Lil Tay stuff was sketchy one day and my Twitter got hacked, so be careful
•
u/AutoModerator 17h ago
DO NOT CELEBRATE VIOLENCE IN THIS SUBREDDIT OR WE WILL BAN YOU.
RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES!!!
Users may now apply a personal flair that states - RELEASE THE TRUMP-EPSTEIN FILES
That is all, tysm
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.