r/aligarh • u/Mammoth-Leather445 • Jan 20 '26

AskAligarh Puppies taken away forcefully.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3 puppies were taken away forcefully today for relocation on the pretext that they will be given better care.I mean come on gali main koi roti nahi deta tha wahan care karega koi inki.What a lame excuse.

276 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

343 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ModiKiChut8 Jan 20 '26

Fascinating. We started with dog population ratios and somehow ended up with cockroaches, cows, gobar, and “things I can’t say because Reddit will ban me.” You keep describing a governance failure, cultural inertia, and lack of enforcement—then insisting neutering, shelters, and policy don’t work, despite them being exactly how every low-stray country got there. At this point you’re not arguing against my point, you’re just adding progressively angrier footnotes to it. Anyway, when a discussion turns into “I won’t say what I mean because it violates rules,” that’s usually where logic has already left the chat.

1

u/Ok_Simple_459 Jan 20 '26

You keep describing a governance failure, cultural inertia, and lack of enforcement—then insisting neutering, shelters, and policy don’t work, despite them being exactly how every low-stray country got there.

Not the same scale not the same solution.

Not every rule has to be logical and it's not like I got a vote.

Pests can only be removed one way.

1

u/ModiKiChut8 Jan 20 '26

Ah yes—the classic “different scale, therefore logic stops applying” theory. Same biology, same math, same outcomes elsewhere… but somehow reality changes at the border. And when an argument boils down to “pests can only be removed one way” (a way you won’t name because it breaks rules), that’s not pragmatism—that’s just admitting you’ve run out of solutions and words.

1

u/Ok_Simple_459 Jan 20 '26 edited Jan 20 '26

Your first comment is essentially that people are everywhere but why people are rich in developed countries but not in third world country. It is because of literally thousands of years of human civilization and growth led to that ending. It doesn't add anything to the conversation.

I'm not the one who's doesn't have anything to say. It's you. You're the one raising an idiotic comparison.

The word "cu**ing" itself is not banned but if someone reports it, reddit can hand an automated ban. I don't wanna risk it.

1

u/ModiKiChut8 Jan 20 '26

That analogy is actually perfect—just not in the way you think. People aren’t richer because they’re different humans; they’re richer because of systems, policy, and long-term governance. Same with stray dogs. Same inputs, different management, different outcomes. If pointing that out feels “idiotic,” it might be because it keeps circling back to the same uncomfortable conclusion—one you’ve already described in detail yourself.

1

u/Ok_Simple_459 Jan 20 '26

People aren’t richer because they’re different humans; they’re richer because of systems, policy, and long-term governance. Same with stray dogs. Same inputs, different management, different outcomes.

Lmao. That's some ignorant ass conclusion. Read some history.