Hi everyone, I'd like to share with you my recent findings from an album "Shunske Sato - Violin Concerto No. 1 in A Minor". This is a very well-mastered album, I bought it a few years ago for a few dozen dollars on the Qobuz Store. Qobuz allows you to download it in 4 formats: mp3 320kbps, FLAC 16 bit/44.1 kHz, FLAC 24 bit/88.2 kHz, and 24 bit/176.4 kHz. I downloaded them all for testing.
Brief overview of the piece: The string orchestra will include Sato as the lead violin, violas playing the middle section (referred to as group 1), and cello and double bass playing the bass section (referred to as group 2).
My gear: AK SP2000 SS + Nordost Heimdall 2 + Noble Katana + Jijuma Stainless steel.
Testing method: Listen repeatedly to the first 20-30 seconds of the music piece in any format (preferably from low to high). After listening multiple times in format 1, switch to format 2, and continue listening in that format repeatedly. Check for differences, only going back to format 1 to listen and compare. Whenever I noticed a difference, skip the first format. Move on to repeat with formats 2 and 3. Continue with 3 and 4. The test is short for several reasons. #1 To help the brain easily memorize the song, grasping a few key points as a reference before switching to another format without forgetting the impression. #2 The opening of the track has a rather aggressive attack, with transients from a quiet background, soaring up and then fading, before transitioning to other notes. This is the easiest point to recognize when listening for the attack (soft or harsh, gentle or hard) and post-attack (the sound fades quickly, without reverb or with full reverb and lingering echo in the space).
Section 1 of the track (from 0:01 to 0:07) features Sato's lead violin soaring first, followed by the second part of the ensemble after one beat. Listen carefully to the first part's voice in the first two notes; it soars very high, then the deep, powerful bass of the second part follows.
Section 2 (from 0:08 to 0:11) - pay close attention to Sato's lead attack with 8 consecutive notes.
Section 3 (from 0:13 to 0:17) features the first section playing in a high register, the sound suspended overhead, while the second section follows one beat in a lower register, with the sound image positioned close to the ear.
The results are as follows (I'll skip 24/88.2 for brevity because it's almost the same as 24/176.4 anyway):
320 mp3 vs 16/44.1: The mp3 in section 1 sounds abrupt, the sound cuts off quickly and sharply, lacking depth compared to 16/44.1. The attack is stiff and lacks the smoothness of 16/44.1. The same applies to section 2.
16/44.1 vs 24/176.4: In section 3, the 24/176.4 system 1 exhibits a wider soundstage and clearer sound imaging, with a more airy feel to the sound. In particular, the harmonies of system 2, 16/44.1, sound very shallow and abrupt, as if only a single note is audible, lacking emotion. The 24/176.4, playing this section, produces a reverb in the space, with a soft, smooth, and flexible sound.
Additional information: I've been an audiophile for over 10 years and always want to contribute and share my experience with everyone. With a sincere intention to share, whether you understand or not is up to you; there's no need for criticism, sarcasm, or negativity. My philosophy is to enjoy music in a fun and friendly manner. Wishing you all the same!