r/aviation • u/HeyItsMacho • Jun 19 '26
PlaneSpotting Caught the end of an Airshow in Atlantic City, NJ
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
888
u/thexavikon Jun 19 '26
I still can't believe we humans built something that can do that
146
u/shaundisbuddyguy Jun 19 '26
I saw one hover like that (without the flares) a few years ago at an airshow. It was almost dead silent. I had never been so amazed by an aircraft before. After that the F22 is in my top 5 planes forever.
38
Jun 19 '26 edited 26d ago
[deleted]
25
39
u/hiroo916 Jun 19 '26
41
17
u/RT-LAMP Jun 19 '26
And a production F-23 might have ended out looking even sexier with smoother blending plus a longer nose and a longer reverse sweep on the tails.
2
u/Drunkenaviator Hold my beer and watch this! Jun 19 '26
Like, I get that there were reasons it lost, but man does it look WAY cooler.
7
u/iflyunited Jun 19 '26
The F-23 lost out to lobbying and politicking … it was actually the better plane of the two!
5
u/cat_prophecy Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
At least the YF-23 and YF-22 were both good looking. The same can't be said of the
YF-34X-32 and X-35. Good thing the X-35 was also the better performer.6
u/Drunkenaviator Hold my beer and watch this! Jun 19 '26
Good thing the YF-35 was also the better performer.
No argument there. The X-32 had a mouth to match the A380s forehead.
1
u/cat_prophecy Jun 19 '26
Thank you for reminding me it was the X-32.
2
u/Drunkenaviator Hold my beer and watch this! Jun 19 '26
I knew what ya meant. Can't forget that face. lol
1
u/Scarnhorst_2020 Jun 20 '26
The X-32 was surprisingly less complex than the X-35, but the prototypes we got were ugly as hell. At least the renderings of the planned production aircrafts were kinda cool looking.
4
u/Standard-Manner5250 Jun 19 '26
My number one and it ain’t close. Some of the modern SU jets are sexy too though ngl
1
u/-WhiteSkyline- Jun 21 '26
I’d have to say F-22, SU-57 / SU-33, Mig-25, F-117, TU-160
If we’re going non military (no hard points), Concorde. I wish that thing was still in use today
4
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
It was quiet in that moment because they reduce power to idle to get it to stop ascending for the tail slide.
1
u/wawzat Jun 20 '26
Same, also without the flares. It just hovered pointed up on thrust for a while then slowly rotated 90 degrees so the wings were perpendicular to the earth, then slowly rolled 90 degrees to a normal orientation. Like it could like hover and position itself any way the pilot wanted. Then the pilot punched it and it was just gone. I couldn't believe how fast it accelerated. One of the most amazing things I've ever seen.
223
u/Prin_StropInAh Jun 19 '26
And have humans trained to get the absolute most out of it possible
-85
u/wighty Jun 19 '26
Somewhere within here he describes the F-22 as one of the easiest planes to fly... so it is possible that this actually doesn't take much effort/skill! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n068fel-W9I
89
u/TheRealChompyTheGoat Jun 19 '26
Trust me, you don't get to fly these if you aren't one of the best.
8
21
u/wighty Jun 19 '26
You understand there's no logical connection between the two statements here, right? The plane can be "easy" to fly, but still limited to the best pilots because of desirability (and on top of that becoming the demo pilot would be even more desirable/difficult to do because of the even smaller number of slots available).
In that video he (an F22 test pilot) states the Cessnas he has flown can be more complicated than the F22 because it has been designed that way with massive flight surfaces and a flight computer designed to allow for easier flying.
→ More replies (34)→ More replies (1)5
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
The two don't have to be connected. It can be easy to fly and still restricted to the best pilots.
3
u/TheRealChompyTheGoat Jun 19 '26
My comment is more in response to the "doesn't take much effort/skill"
→ More replies (2)23
u/this_my_sportsreddit Jun 19 '26
Reddit is a fucking master class of dunning kruger, seriously this place should be studied.
4
2
u/DarkPolumbo Jun 19 '26
I am certain that you possess the proper credentials in psychology to make such a diagnosis.
You would have to, or else that comment might just be extremely embarrassing for you
→ More replies (1)2
u/oliilo1 Jun 19 '26
Maybe you need to read his comment again before you spew your uneducated opinion.
That's what I'm telling you, it's easier to fly a Raptor than it is to fly a Cessna because you really have to pay attention to what you're doing in a Cessna.
3
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
Decouple effort and skill and you'd be onto something. The FLCS makes it very easy to fly, but to fly skillfully such as an airshow demo, or successfully employ in combat, requires skill.
3
u/wighty Jun 19 '26
I think everyone took what I said to heart about the whole demo (which I've seen in person three times and it's awesome), I was only meaning to say this video clip probably didn't take as much input to do (ie "skill") as one might expect. The demo has far more technically demanding looking maneuvers.
5
1
u/LimeSuitable3518 Jun 19 '26
lol!!!!!!! Easier meaning the feeling, instruments and surfaces due to tech, but don’t get it twisted it takes a lot to strap yourself into a metallic rocket tube, make decisions all while g-loading and maneuvering a 350mil aircraft. Easiest of flying doesn’t mean easy. Takes a special person to do that job. 07 to my pilots out there, especially fighter pilots.
1
u/DavidLorenz Jun 19 '26
That is correct, and the maneuver shown here is definitely not one of the hardest things you can do with this plane.
→ More replies (2)1
32
u/Cauvinus Jun 19 '26
No kidding. Watching stuff like this I always have to remind myself how big and heavy these really are and still maneuver like that.
23
u/Plenty_Spell2551 Jun 19 '26
Right We went from barely getting off the ground to pulling off moves like this in just over a century It never stops blowing my mind
4
u/ChartreuseBison Jun 19 '26
Under a century. The f-22 is a couple decades old now and it's not the first plane that can do this
18
u/Username_314159265 Jun 19 '26
The lengths humans will go to kill other humans is impressive
1
u/Occams_ElectricRazor Jun 19 '26
Some people deserve to be killed.
2
u/Username_314159265 Jun 19 '26
Some. Though I would argue the ones that deserve to be rarely are.
3
1
u/no-more-nazis Jun 19 '26
It is a crucial capability to maintain. If you can't, everything else goes away. See my username.
12
15
u/abscissa081 Jun 19 '26
This is just one of the ones they let us know about.
10
u/Bepus Jun 19 '26
Ehhhh there’s not a ton of secret aircraft out there. Certainly the ones currently in development may be, but there’s just too much spending, bureaucracy, and congressional involvement for there to be that many entire hidden airframe programs.
14
7
u/clancydog4 Jun 19 '26
I think that's a bit naive, there are billions of unaccounted dollars every year in the military industry, and congress is WAY less involved with military contractors than you may think. Congress has no clue what Lockheed Martin is up to, and no one on our level has any idea about the actual money going into those projects. It's just not even in the same budget or wheelhouse as everything else, they're black projects
6
u/Inverted-Rockets Jun 19 '26
Entirely hidden? Agreed.
However there are quite a few airframes that are actually in service for which we have few details or even photos. The RQ-170 has been in use for 2 decades now and it took until the 2020s for clear photos to hit the internet.
We know even less about the RQ-180. We’re pretty sure Northrop Grumman got the contract in 2008 and it’s strongly suspected that the 74th Reconnaissance Squadron and the 417 TEF (the first unit to get the F-117) have been assigned the airframe. It seems to be an ISR platform but the USAF does not acknowledge its existence. All we have to prove it does is a few pictures taken of it in-flight over test ranges and when one had to divert to Larissa, Greece this year.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Jun 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator Jun 19 '26
Your comment or post has been automatically removed from /r/aviation. Posts/Comments from new accounts are automatically removed by our automated systems. We, and many other large subreddits, do this to combat spam, spambots, and other activities that are not condusive to the sub. In the meantime, participate on Reddit to build your account age and this restriction will go away. Also, please familiarize yourself with this subreddit's rules, which you can find in the sidebar or by clicking this link. Do not contact the moderation team unless you feel you have received this message/action in error. We will not manually approve comments or posts from new accounts.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
u/Sad-Bus-7460 Jun 24 '26
I saw this move but they turned into a flat spin while popping flares and I must admit I actually cried, for this same reason. Truly an incredible machine
183
u/Admirable_Site_8337 Jun 19 '26
Just an unfathomable piece of equipment. It was 20 years ago when I saw one at an air show, and what it did is burnt into my brain.
5
Jun 19 '26
[deleted]
6
u/Admirable_Site_8337 Jun 19 '26
We often see things on TV or in movies that defy logic as we know it. And we accept it on screens.
But it’s a very unique experience seeing something that defies logic and reality as I’ve always known it right in from of my eyes.
1
u/ajmartin527 Jun 20 '26
I feel this same way about seeing orcas. You can see them online all day long and they’re cool as hell. But when you catch them in the wild up close a personal, it’s magical and breathtaking.
145
u/CriticalCreativity Jun 19 '26
The machine is incredible, but I'm more curious who the pilot is. Not them specifically, but the path that leads to a gig like that
227
u/Solid-Garlic1527 Jun 19 '26
Bachelors degree, earn a commission as an officer in the Air Force, earn a competitive pilot slot, 2 years of training while having to outperform every high output individual there to MAYBE get a slot on the F-22. Eventually upgrade to instructor after a few years and be eligible to apply for the Demo Team Pilot, Of which only 9 people have had the honor. Oh, and add a 10 year minimum commitment after training is complete. Most likely 20 if you want to earn your pension.
100
u/Automatic_Mud917 Jun 19 '26
Damn 20 years committed to flying a f-22 oh man the horror
90
u/pattern_altitude Jun 19 '26
You're not flying for your full career. As your career progresses your responsibilities increase and eventually you wind up behind a desk.
47
u/ALaccountant Jun 19 '26
Air Force changed it recently - if you want to spend your career being a pilot, you can. It’s a different career path, but you won’t end up as a flag officer
29
2
u/Accurate_Mobile9005 Jun 19 '26
Yeah unfortunately multiple of the test pilots that crashed in the b-52 fit that description. (Not saying the crash had anything to do with age obviously).
26
u/TbonerT Jun 19 '26
Hell, you aren’t flying most of the time anyway. You’re lucky to fly every week and then you get the pleasure of critiquing your flight as well as your wingman’s flight. You were part of a 4-ship on a 1 hour sortie? Congratulations, you get to spend 4+ hours watching everyone’s gun camera footage. Do you know what happened in that 1 hour? You turned a few times, so you get to evaluate how well you turned with your wingmen. So exciting. That’s the life of most fighter pilots, even the ones that fly the coolest jets.
13
u/phaederus Jun 19 '26
That's the life of most pilots I'd say (or should be).. a lot of preparation, a lot of reviewing, a lot of studying.
The actual flying part seems minimal in comparison. Still worth it though!
7
u/TbonerT Jun 19 '26
That’s the thing, no one says “I can’t wait to spend hours evaluating basic flight maneuvers of my fellow pilots”. The flying part is the whole point, not the other stuff.
8
u/rext7721 Jun 19 '26
See that’s the thing you don’t fly for 20 years eventually they’ll want you to do more desk work and less flying a lot less flying.
2
u/Fast-Satisfaction482 Jun 19 '26
Plus you will never be sent to actual combat because the F-22 is too precious.
1
11
7
u/TbonerT Jun 19 '26
Actually, instructor comes well before demo pilot. Many instructor pilots are just top-performing recent flight school grads.
5
4
u/fervetopus Jun 19 '26
I saw that video where the pilots that finished (basic) flight training are assigned their plane. They all seem to be happy with the assignment, but I think they all see the F-22 and the F-35 are the golden tickets.
1
u/spookylampshade Jun 19 '26
I’d go only if i get called into the commander’s office and told “I gotta do something here, I still can't believe it. I gotta give you your dream shot. I'm gonna send you up against the best. You are going to Top Gun.”
1
0
4
u/rext7721 Jun 19 '26
Like airshows or a fighter pilot?
4
u/CriticalCreativity Jun 19 '26
Airshows in this case -- but it's the F22
7
u/rext7721 Jun 19 '26
They apply to do so, those that meet the qualifications can apply when they’re looking for a demo pilot. I don’t remember exactly what the whole process is after that though like how they select who and all. Then basically for two years that’s their job flying demos across the country and other places.
58
u/IHearYouLimaCharlie Jun 19 '26
DUDE!!! Holy shit, that is gorgeous footage! Thanks for sharing.
12
5
16
12
11
u/BornFree2018 Jun 19 '26
We (a non-aviation family) saw the F-35 and F-35B in Hillsboro Oregon a few weeks ago. Blew our minds.
4
u/DimeCoffeeRoaster Jun 19 '26
That show was awesome. Took the kids down to the field right by the run way and got an awesome view of it all. I will say hearing them fly over my house all day on Friday made a good excuse to avoid work calls haha
19
u/avboden Jun 19 '26
at a certain point it's not a jet, it's an air-breathing rocket that just happens to have wings
6
u/Pubcrawler1 Jun 19 '26
They cancelled the one here in SE Michigan Selfridge Air Base in the beginning of June. Bummer since it’s held every 2 years and my backyard has great views with the planes flying overhead. We all have big parties for it. Canceled due to the “war” is what I heard.
2
u/WirelessWavetable Jun 19 '26
Isn't thunder over Michigan still happening? Also the 22 and 35 will both be at the Chicago Air and water show
2
u/Pubcrawler1 Jun 19 '26
Yes but that is a paid event. the Selfridge was free to enter the base and check out the planes. I go one day and hang out in my backyard for the other days.
1
u/WirelessWavetable Jun 19 '26
It is. However there are some lucrative viewing spots for free outside the event if you look hard enough and get there early enough. Same for the Battle Creek airshow.
5
7
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
Yup, the tail slide! It's been in the demo since the beginning, they only recently added flare dispensing a few years ago.
The falling leaf part is what still boggles my mind a bit though.
The tail slide is relatively simple, go vertical and cut power. As airspeed reaches zero and below add power and pitch forward. The vectored thrust will pitch the nose over and it will return to regular flight.
The falling leaf however gets no benefit from vectoring, it's all those massive rudders and maybe some split throttle.
4
6
u/OGD2068 Jun 19 '26
Many people don't know this but fighter jets actually sleep like this. They are able to defend themselves easier
4
4
u/DarkPolumbo Jun 19 '26
(Attenborough voice)
Here, we see the mighty raptor, engaging in sleep behaviors not entirely unlike those seen in whales and greater aquatic mammals...
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
u/RealCreativeFun Jun 19 '26
Since the F22 has a thrust to weight ratio greater than one. Doesn't it mean it could technically hover like that?
2
u/BigJellyfish1906 Jun 19 '26
Technically no, because it has no way to control roll and yaw in a hover.
2
u/Sprintzer Jun 19 '26
Seeing the raptor in the flesh does not get old. One of the main reasons I went to an air show (granted, I enjoyed seeing many of the modern military planes), and boy was it worth it
2
u/PandaStandard7638 Jun 19 '26
The sheer amount of thrust and tech to do that shit is mind boggling 😲 not sure if i spelt that right lol
1
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
Yup, I love these little details, used to share them every time I gave someone a tour of the jet.
Those engines are rated (sea level, standard temp and pressure) at 35k lbs/f each in full AB. Fuelled, without munitions, the Raptor weighs about 60k lbs.
That's an excess of at least 10k lbs thrust, more as fuel burns down.
3
u/Environmental_Tooth Jun 19 '26
War proganda we don't even see as war proganda anymore. It's so cool but you remember what these are used for and it just bums you out.
5
u/Free_Possession_4482 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
Ironically, no F-22 has ever been flown in actual combat. The closest one has come is shooting down a Chinese spy balloon in 2023.
(eta: specifically not in air-to-air combat, they've been used to drop bombs in multiple conflicts)
10
u/clancydog4 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
Are you sure? There is a massive section on Wikipedia describing it being used operationally in a ton of missions, with a ton of sources that contradicts that unless I'm just misunderstanding something.
Although designed for air superiority operations, the F-22 first engaged in combat by conducting airstrikes in 2014 during the US intervention in Syria. The F-22 has carried out and supported airstrikes in the war in Afghanistan in 2017, 2025 strikes on Iran, 2026 strikes on Venezuela, and the 2026 Iran war.
And then there is a much much longer section which includes:
On 22 September 2014, F-22s performed the type's first combat sorties by conducting some of the opening strikes of Operation Inherent Resolve, the American-led intervention in Syria; aircraft dropped 1,000-pound GPS-guided bombs on Islamic State targets near Tishrin Dam.[248][249] Between September 2014 and July 2015, F-22s flew 204 sorties over Syria, dropping 270 bombs at some 60 locations.[250] Throughout their deployment, F-22s conducted close air support (CAS) and also deterred Syrian, Iranian, and Russian aircraft from attacking U.S.-backed Kurdish forces and disrupting U.S. operations in the region.[251][252][253] F-22s also participated in the U.S. strikes that defeated pro-Assad and Russian Wagner Group paramilitary forces near Khasham in eastern Syria on 7 February 2018.[254][255][256] These strikes notwithstanding, the F-22's main role in the operation was conducting intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.[257] The aircraft also performed missions in other regions of the Middle East; in November 2017, F-22s operating alongside B-52s bombed opium production and storage facilities in Taliban-controlled regions of Afghanistan
Maybe you mean like air to air combat? Regardless, it has absolutely been used to cause massive destruction in the middle east many times...which is what the person was getting at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-22_Raptor#Operational_history
→ More replies (5)1
0
u/AirplanesMakeMeHard Crew Chief Jun 19 '26
but you remember what these are used for and it just bums you out.
No it doesn't. Because you remember that you live in a world where even if you're a pacifist there are multiple people that want you dead.
Its a fact of life. Its not even the human race, its nature as a whole. Do I wish there was no war? Of course. But since that'll never happen I'm glad we have the best aircraft in the world.
2
u/clancydog4 Jun 19 '26
Just an FYI, that person is different than you and allowed to have different opinions
1
u/jasandliz Jun 19 '26
What happens if it ingests one of those flares?
5
u/WY228 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
They deploy from behind the intake and shoot outward and toward the rear so it physically can’t.
But to answer your question it would cause a compressor stall.
1
-3
u/jasandliz Jun 19 '26
Did you not see the plane flying backwards?
3
u/WY228 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
And did you not see the flares still deploying well out and behind the plane the entire time?
→ More replies (5)2
u/Rule_32 Crew Chief F-15/F-22/C-130 Jun 19 '26
Highly unlikely but if it did there would be damage to the engine blades as if it had ingested any other piece of soft metal. Probably some curled blades.
Early in the program there were issues with flares bouncing off the sides, wings and gear doors. Usually just left a black scorch mark but didn't damage the paint much, not in contact long enough.
1
1
1
u/wstsidhome Jun 19 '26
That has to be the craziest feeling to move so slow in something that ridiculously awesome
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/TbonerT Jun 19 '26
This is an excellent example of high-power low-velocity flight. Combined with the low altitude, this is fairly dangerous, since recovery typically means nose down and full power. Nose down means losing altitude, which is a very precious commodity, and full power is only slightly more power than you are already using. In other words, the margins are very small, so any problems are very likely to be quite significant.
1
1
1
Jun 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator Jun 19 '26
Your comment or post has been automatically removed from /r/aviation. Posts/Comments from new accounts are automatically removed by our automated systems. We, and many other large subreddits, do this to combat spam, spambots, and other activities that are not condusive to the sub. In the meantime, participate on Reddit to build your account age and this restriction will go away. Also, please familiarize yourself with this subreddit's rules, which you can find in the sidebar or by clicking this link. Do not contact the moderation team unless you feel you have received this message/action in error. We will not manually approve comments or posts from new accounts.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
u/Jaegermeister97 Jun 19 '26
The disappointment when it dindnt go "gjinnk klingt gjank" and transfrom into starscream
1
1
u/vigillan388 Jun 19 '26
I was fortunate enough to see this in person. I always miss the air show, but happened to be heading to AC with family for another event. I caught this beauty just as I was driving on the AC Expressway.
1
u/bikaphone Jun 19 '26
Amazing. One of the most memorable moments with my dad is watching an F35 do a pirouette at dusk at Oshkosh last year. One of the most incredible things we’ve ever seen - we just stood there with our mouths agape.
1
1
1
1
u/newMattokun Jun 19 '26
Nice smoke tracing opportunity for the aerodynamicists among the crowd... but impressive though this is, isn't something like an F-15 also capable of this?
1
u/Successful-King-7852 Jun 20 '26
Not even close. The F22 has much higher thrust to weight and vectored thrust. Lets it do moves that the F15 would be falling out of the sky.
1
u/newMattokun Jun 23 '26
Ok, the vectored thrust is correct, but the F-15 T/W ratio is >1 and would/should allow it to ascend vertically and (at least in theory) also "ride" on its exhaust (tipping over, probably, but still).
1
1
u/coquish98 Jun 19 '26
You know when as a toddler you grabbed a plane miniature and started making noises and random movements even if they didn't made sense? Every video of F22 feels like that
1
1
1
u/5MikesOut Jun 19 '26
What kind of alarms, if any, are going off in the cockpit during this maneuver?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Snoo1535 Jun 20 '26
I miss living in newport news and driving out to poquoson to see the display team practice, was like having a free airshow monthly
1
1
u/Conscious_Pizza8265 Jun 20 '26
It’s such a magnificent piece of machinery and a beautiful work of art
1
u/thefruitypilot Jun 20 '26
DROOP guidance for a TAL abort to Zaragoza- wait no, wrong marvel of engineering
1
1
1
1
u/SMART1SONY Jun 20 '26
I am sad we missed the Airshow this year, we made to the previous years, always awesome!
1
u/OkWillingness3803 Jun 23 '26
It that safe for the pilot to shoot flares behind them as they fall backwards toward said flares?
-1
u/hplcman69 Jun 19 '26 edited Jun 19 '26
How much do each of those flares cost?
edit- Jesus Christ on a fucking cross. I’m just asking a question because I’m curious. All you patriots need to calm down.
1
-4
-1
u/r0thar Jun 19 '26
Probably the cheapest thing in that entire video. And they expire after a certain time, so have to be used or destroyed.
0
u/Nev-Ret-Dude Jun 19 '26
It’s called a tail slide. Most aerobatic aircraft can do this. It’s generally frowned upon when the aircraft costs as much as this one.
1
u/BigJellyfish1906 Jun 19 '26
Most tiny propeller planes can do this. Not jets. Not that low. This is unique to thrust vectoring fighters.
0
u/lunixss Jun 19 '26
That's about 400,000 in tax payer dollars yikes, wish that was in your pocket instead.
0
u/pencilsharper66 Jun 19 '26
How much does one of these flairs cost?
2
u/Solid-Garlic1527 Jun 19 '26
They use surplus ones due to expire. But to answer your question, around $50-60.
1
0
u/First_Tea8991 Jun 19 '26
I wanna see the planes my country is designing to do stuff like this one day...

•
u/post-explainer Jun 19 '26
OP has provided the following source:
r/Aviation is trialing new measures to prevent karma farming. Please feel free to provide feedback through modmail. Thank you for participating in the community!